Questions to Christians

[Fairy]

it's not good for the accuser to sooth their injured feelings by seeking public approval

Then every war raging away on earth should never be aired as news on tv, or any other social media internet platform.
Any War between two opposing mind-sets should be just be allowed to fester without any audience ever knowing they exist.

War is war, and injured people injure back their injurer's, it's just the law of this human zoo we like to call humanity on earth.

Take a good look around on Youtube at what injured men and women are saying about each other, it's an absolute shitshow free for all, and no one seems to care or stop it.

Truth is, people just cannot stand each other, they do not like other people, this is a fact, every one gossips behind other peoples backs all the time, it's what I have learnt about humanity, and I'm in no denial, I live in the real world, I'm a realist.

If people could read other peoples minds, no one would be alive today, this is fact, we'll have annihilated each other by now.

[henry quirk]

I admit I've made it everyone's business, because I thought it was only appropriate that people were made aware of just exactly who they are talking to when they engage with strangers on this internet forum.

No, that's not true. You vomited your life onto the forum cuz your nut cracked. There wasn't, isn't, anything noble about it. He yanked your crank and you're sore about it. That's it, that's all. Now, mebbe you have a right to be sore about it. Mebbe he did use you. I don't know. I only have your side. What I do know: he's smarmy and you're nuts.

all you've got is just a few pieces of the picture, and that bugs the crap out of you, not knowing the full story.

Yeah, it does. Occupational hazard.

-----

you'll only care for the side which suits you the best, and I think you've already made up your mind about that, I guess.

Only thing I've made up my mind on: he's smarmy, you're nuts. I suspect he's not the dog you've portrayed him as. But it's a suspicion, not a conclusion.

There's two sides to every story, and then there's the real truth,

There's the truth and there's the lie. Only question: who's got which?

[Fairy]

I admit I've made it everyone's business, because I thought it was only appropriate that people were made aware of just exactly who they are talking to when they engage with strangers on this internet forum.

No, that's not true. You vomited your life onto the forum cuz your nut cracked. There wasn't, isn't, anything noble about it. He yanked your crank and you're sore about it. That's it, that's all. Now, mebbe you have a right to be sore about it. Mebbe he did use you. I don't know. I only have your side. What I do know: he's smarmy and you're nuts.

all you've got is just a few pieces of the picture, and that bugs the crap out of you, not knowing the full story.

Yeah, it does. Occupational hazard.

-----

you'll only care for the side which suits you the best, and I think you've already made up your mind about that, I guess.

Only thing I've made up my mind on: he's smarmy, you're nuts. I suspect he's not the dog you've portrayed as. But it's a suspicion, not a conclusion.

There's two sides to every story, and then there's the real truth,

There's the truth and there's the lie. Only question: who's got which?

Like I said, that's not for you to know the truth, unless you were actually present and bore witness..but you simply were not there were you, dumb brain.

Yes, everything else you have said is correct, I agree. I have no shame in revealing my true self.

I'm ok with it, seems you are not. But to hell with what you think, I frankly do not give a damn.

Feel better for getting all that off your chest do you, great! it's also best not to suppress your true feeling, else they fester like boils of poisonous puss inside your body....lancing is very relieving don't you know, and right now I'm feeling extremely relieved thank goodness.

[promethean75]

"his attitude changed completely to oh good, another fuckable woman I can pursue for my entertainment and pleasure only"

Well in my opinion, that a guy his age is at a philosophy forum to pick up intellectual chicks, is quite impressive actually. I think instead we should be praising and rooting him on, not criticizing him.

All young male forum philosophers should look up to Harbal as a kind of forum OG and aspire to follow his example.

[accelafine]

"his attitude changed completely to oh good, another fuckable woman I can pursue for my entertainment and pleasure only"

Well in my opinion, that a guy his age is at a philosophy forum to pick up intellectual chicks, is quite impressive actually. I think instead we should be praising and rooting him on, not criticizing him.

All young male forum philosophers should look up to Harbal as a kind of forum OG and aspire to follow his example.

Well you would say that, you misogynistic jerk.

[accelafine]

I admit I've made it everyone's business, because I thought it was only appropriate that people were made aware of just exactly who they are talking to when they engage with strangers on this internet forum.

No, that's not true. You vomited your life onto the forum cuz your nut cracked. There wasn't, isn't, anything noble about it. He yanked your crank and you're sore about it. That's it, that's all. Now, mebbe you have a right to be sore about it. Mebbe he did use you. I don't know. I only have your side. What I do know: he's smarmy and you're nuts.

all you've got is just a few pieces of the picture, and that bugs the crap out of you, not knowing the full story.

Yeah, it does. Occupational hazard.

-----

you'll only care for the side which suits you the best, and I think you've already made up your mind about that, I guess.

Only thing I've made up my mind on: he's smarmy, you're nuts. I suspect he's not the dog you've portrayed him as. But it's a suspicion, not a conclusion.

There's two sides to every story, and then there's the real truth,

There's the truth and there's the lie. Only question: who's got which?

Women are well accustomed to the 'you're nuts' line from men. It's not exactly original. How much 'normal' do you see in this overwhelmingly male forum? I don't see you men calling each other 'nuts'. Some of the regulars are so insane that they induce vertigo.
And I've already said that Hairyballs is a predator in sheep's clothing (although men would consider that an admirable quality and worthy of a slap on the back).

[accelafine]

The pr1k uses internet forums more active on this one, to lure women into his bed.

So I’m just making sure he doesn’t hurt anyone else by revealing his cold hearted behaviour to the same forum he uses to hurt people.

He stole and broke my heart…now I steal his only true beloved…this forum.

You have a good reason then to name and shame an individual. But it's not a sufficient reason, unfortunately. I think the most that is permissible on a public forum is to say a general warning against being groomed by internet predators, and perhaps that you had personal experience of one on this very forum.

Rubbish, unless 'Harbal' is his real name and she's posted his home address. That's called 'doxxing' on social media. A forum username means nothing.

[attofishpi]

The pr1k uses internet forums more active on this one, to lure women into his bed.

So I’m just making sure he doesn’t hurt anyone else by revealing his cold hearted behaviour to the same forum he uses to hurt people.

He stole and broke my heart…now I steal his only true beloved…this forum.

You have a good reason then to name and shame an individual. But it's not a sufficient reason, unfortunately. I think the most that is permissible on a public forum is to say a general warning against being groomed by internet predators, and perhaps that you had personal experience of one on this very forum.

Rubbish, unless 'Harbal' is his real name and she's posted his home address. That's called 'doxxing' on social media. A forum username means nothing.

Is it odd how clearly stupid people (Fairy) attract those that take advantage of stupid people (Harbal) -- and then blame the world for their idiocy.

[accelafine]

You have a good reason then to name and shame an individual. But it's not a sufficient reason, unfortunately. I think the most that is permissible on a public forum is to say a general warning against being groomed by internet predators, and perhaps that you had personal experience of one on this very forum.

Rubbish, unless 'Harbal' is his real name and she's posted his home address. That's called 'doxxing' on social media. A forum username means nothing.

Is it odd how clearly stupid people (Fairy) attract those that take advantage of stupid people (Harbal) -- and then blame the world for their idiocy.

That's a really stupid comment.

[attofishpi]

Rubbish, unless 'Harbal' is his real name and she's posted his home address. That's called 'doxxing' on social media. A forum username means nothing.

Is it odd how clearly stupid people (Fairy) attract those that take advantage of stupid people (Harbal) -- and then blame the world for their idiocy.

That's a really stupid comment.

I think you've been burnt. Is that also a stupid comment?

[accelafine]

Is it odd how clearly stupid people (Fairy) attract those that take advantage of stupid people (Harbal) -- and then blame the world for their idiocy.

That's a really stupid comment.

I think you've been burnt. Is that also a stupid comment?

Yes. it is. Nothing about me is remotely any of your business. Why do the moronic ***** on here always make it personal when someone is simply stating facts and logic? Is that too much for their teensy, egotistical male brains to cope with?

[attofishpi]

That's a really stupid comment.

I think you've been burnt. Is that also a stupid comment?

Yes. it is. Nothing about me is remotely any of your business.

What part of philosophy are you not comprehending on a philosophy forum? WE R ANALYSING EACH OTHER, THAT MAKES IT MY BUSINESS

I believe a 'man' c_heated on you.

Why does the only SAGE on here always make it personal when someone is simply stating facts and logic?

Usually because you are applying very little logic to deduce any facts.

Calling people "stupid" as I have here is not particularly sage like, but we do have a short fuse at times with faithless idiots that bitch and moan about THEIR reality when it is all because of THEIR shortcomings.

Thus.

Is it odd how clearly stupid people (Fairy) attract those that take advantage of stupid people (Harbal) -- and then blame the world for their idiocy.

Stands otherwise explain how my statement is equally as stupid as Fairy?

[accelafine]

I think you've been burnt. Is that also a stupid comment?

Yes. it is. Nothing about me is remotely any of your business.

What part of philosophy are you not comprehending on a philosophy forum? WE R ANALYSING EACH OTHER, THAT MAKES IT MY BUSINESS

I believe a 'man' c_heated on you.

Why does the only SAGE on here always make it personal when someone is simply stating facts and logic?

Usually because you are applying very little logic to deduce any facts.

Calling people "stupid" as I have here is not particularly sage like, but we do have a short fuse at times with faithless idiots that bitch and moan about THEIR reality when it is all because of THEIR shortcomings.

Thus.

Is it odd how clearly stupid people (Fairy) attract those that take advantage of stupid people (Harbal) -- and then blame the world for their idiocy.

Stands otherwise explain how my statement is equally as stupid as Fairy?

''Deleted''. I keep forgetting that you like to whack off to my insults. You seriously need to lay off the sissy porn ''deleted''.

[Fairy]

"his attitude changed completely to oh good, another fuckable woman I can pursue for my entertainment and pleasure only"

Well in my opinion, that a guy his age is at a philosophy forum to pick up intellectual chicks, is quite impressive actually. I think instead we should be praising and rooting him on, not criticizing him.

All young male forum philosophers should look up to Harbal as a kind of forum OG and aspire to follow his example.

I think you are a tad befuddled with your opinion of a person you’ve never met. All you’ve done is project your ideal of what you personally would want H to be, completely disregarding what he actually is.

Only I know him let’s not forget that. He told me he doesn’t like people, especially that he doesn’t like men. So before he ever knew me for real, he mistook me for a man, so they can’t be intellectuals, they can however be poisonous little fuckers. That’s what he called me before he knew I was a woman. H even said he thought I was an American man, and that made his assumption of me worse in his opinion. You see, posters have no idea who they are talking to, so they presume and project their dislikes and prejudices onto them, that’s not something to root for or praise is it? …So who the heck do you think this so called “we” is that should be praising and rooting for someone like that?

[accelafine]

You are wasting your energy. Men are always going to side with men. It wouldn't matter if he was a serial killer. Women need to wake up and realise that.