"socrates"

[Walker]

"I do not know Socrates."

He famously said, I drank what?

No one said that.

Well which is it, no one or nothing. Uh oh. Duality.

[Age]

"I do not know Socrates."

Okay.

Most of you people in the days when this was being written also did not 'know' "socrates", neither.

[puto]

Having, studied skepticism, the Socratic Method, and The Republic still does not prove rationalism only your dogmatism.

[Fairy]

He famously said, I drank what?

No one said that.

Well which is it, no one or nothing. Uh oh. Duality.

No thing said that.

There’s no such thing as nothing because nothing is not a thing.

One implies a thing. Things cannot see, speak, or hear. Things are the looked upon, things are the spoken, things are the heard.

There’s just looking, speaking, and hearing….by no one. Non duality, is Two, and yet not two. Non duality is duality, which is both the looking and the looked upon, appearing as both the exact same identical mirror image of the looker. Both the looker and the looked upon are empty fullness.

The one aka the thing, is what’s seen, not what’s looking, because what’s looking is not a thing. What’s looking is no thing, thinging….

The one is the looked upon by no thing…for there is no separation in the dual nature between the looker and the looked upon. There is no gap between the two, between the looker and the looked upon…and yet there seems to be two, albeit illusory. It’s all the non dual appearing as duality.

If you’d like me to explain that to you again one million times over, just let me know.

[Walker]

If you’d like me to explain that to you again one million times over, just let me know.

The energy required for a million, dualistic explanations of nothing by no one for no purpose would never-the-less wear out even most durable of form/consciousness entities for no purpose, no reason, no how. The solution is to enlist the aid of AI. Dualistically rig up an auto response that can handle a million unique answers to a million repetitious requests, and if done as if no one will ever need it, that could affect the dualistically determined quality and efficiency of the million times project, as determined by holding up a personal, dualistic intent.

What does no one think?

[Fairy]

If you’d like me to explain that to you again one million times over, just let me know.

The energy required for a million, dualistic explanations of nothing by no one for no purpose would never-the-less wear out even most durable of form/consciousness entities for no purpose, no reason, no how. The solution is to enlist the aid of AI. Dualistically rig up an auto response that can handle a million unique answers to a million repetitious requests, and if done as if no one will ever need it, that could affect the dualistically determined quality and efficiency of the million times project, as determined by holding up a personal, dualistic intent.

What does no one think?

Wait for the echo. I am the last idiot that’s what no one thinks.

[Age]

Having, studied skepticism, the Socratic Method, and The Republic still does not prove rationalism only your dogmatism.

1. Was this claim of 'yours' directed at any one in particular?

2. If yes, then who, exactly?

3. Or, are you saying that after 'you', "puto", having studied skepticism, the 'socratic method', and 'the republic' 'you', still, cannot prove rationalism, but only 'your dogmatism'?

4. In fact, what is 'it', exactly, that you are saying, and meaning, here?

[puto]

Was this claim of 'yours' directed at any one in particular?

I thought you were a philosopher? Plato talked about words what did he say? I could have so much fun with you, and not even go to your level of thinking and responding.