∞ is a free variable

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Skepdick »

Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:00 am They are too liberal to want to have any rules in place let alone know what rules should be put in place.

Sort of like you.

I just hope they aren't as fucked up as you are.
One thing's certain.

We are very lucky you don't get to decide on any rules.

Seeming as you keep choosing the wrong division.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:02 am One thing's certain.

We are very lucky you don't get to decide on any rules.
Not "we" but "Skepdick and the like". There are people who are pro-rules, you know, not everyone is a spoiled degenerate child.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Skepdick »

Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:04 am Not "we" but "Skepdick and the like". There are people who are pro-rules, you know, not everyone is a spoiled degenerate child.
The irony should hit you in the nether regions once more.

I am not against rules. I am against bad rules.

My rules are better than yours.

N / N -> N x N is a different Mathematical function to N / N -> N
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:12 am I am not against rules.
You very much are. Stop lying.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Skepdick »

Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:13 am
Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:12 am I am not against rules.
You very much are. Stop lying.
I am against YOUR rules yes.

I am definitely not against MY rules.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:12 am N / N -> N x N is a different Mathematical function to N / N -> N
It's irrelevant, dummy. In both cases, the remainder is present and it's the same provided that the inputs are the same. Whether or not the remainder is included in the result changes nothing with regards to what wtf has said in his post.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:14 am I am against YOUR rules yes.

I am definitely not against MY rules.
Blah blah blah.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Skepdick »

Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:19 am It's irrelevant, dummy. In both cases, the remainder is present and it's the same provided that the inputs are the same. Whether or not the remainder is included in the result changes nothing with regards to what wtf has said in his post.
It's directly relevant to identification of even numbers, dummy.

wtf defined even numbers as those which divide by 2 without remainder.

They all divide by 2 without remainder when you use division without remainder.

3/2 = 1 WITHOUT REMAINDER. Therefore 3 is even.
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:25 am
Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:19 am It's irrelevant, dummy. In both cases, the remainder is present and it's the same provided that the inputs are the same. Whether or not the remainder is included in the result changes nothing with regards to what wtf has said in his post.
It's directly relevant to identification of odd and even numbers, dummy.

wtf defined even numbers as those which divide by 2 without reminder.

3/2 = 1 WITHOUT REMINDER. Therefore 3 is even.
We go back to what I said earlier. Your entire tactic consists in MISINTERPRETING what other people saying while trying to make it look like you aren't committing that mistake. It's pure sophistry relying on equivocation.

Dummy, the remainder of the integer division of 3 by 2 is 1. Thus, 3 is an odd number.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Skepdick »

Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:30 am Dummy, the remainder of the integer division of 3 by 2 is 1.
Contradiction. Integer division has no remainder.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:31 am
Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:30 am Dummy, the remainder of the integer division of 3 by 2 is 1.
Contradiction. Integer division has no remainder.
Contradiction. Every division has a remainder ( even fi that remainder is zero. )

The term "remainder" refers to the difference between the dividend and the divisor multiplied by the quotient.

It has nothing to do with what's in the output of the function.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Skepdick »

Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:34 am Contradiction. Every division has a remainder.
Magnus Anderson wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:43 pm Integer division "refers to the process of dividing two integers and obtaining the quotient without any fractional part
Contradiction.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:35 am
Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:34 am Contradiction. Every division has a remainder.
Magnus Anderson wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:43 pm Integer division "refers to the process of dividing two integers and obtaining the quotient without any fractional part
Contradiction.
It means that the quotient has no fractional part, dummy, not that there is no remainder.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Magnus Anderson »

You have a really hard time listening and understanding what other people are saying.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: ∞ is a free variable

Post by Skepdick »

Magnus Anderson wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:38 am It means that the quotient has no fractional part, dummy, not that there is no remainder.
It doesn't mean that.

"fractional part" is synonymous with "remainder".

https://mathworld.wolfram.com/IntegerDivision.html
Integer division is division in which the fractional part (remainder) is discarded
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/co ... r-division
Integer division refers to the process of dividing two integers and obtaining the quotient without any fractional part.
ChatGPT
Integer division is a mathematical operation where one integer is divided by another, and the result is the quotient without the remainder. In this operation, the result is always an integer, with any fractional part discarded

While you were copy-pasting blindly you didn't even understand what any of the text means.
Post Reply