WW3 breaking out

[Impenitent]

https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-822801

Iran is about to become a ghost

-Imp

[accelafine]

And all thanks to those child-torturing inbred plasticinians. I guess they were desperate to 'get acquainted' with those 72 virgins ('funny' how it has to be virgins). Wokies will be overjoyed. They can build their little 'marxist' utopia after the nuclear winter.

[promethean75]

Civilizations and societies that evolved technologically at much slower paces due to any number of reasons - inhospitable climate and lack of resource variety, inner-fighting between people because of unstable government, etc. - tend to have customs permitting custodialship over females and much younger marriage and ready-for-reproduction ages. For one, a large family is like having property assests, and two, more childrens to help with the extensive work, and three, people died at early ages so you'd have a large family, expecting to lose one or two people.

That's why the pedocraze still exists in the ideologies of the eastern religions; they're all still second world countries that haven't been through the industrialized liberating transformation of traditional gender roles that western capitalism and liberal democracies have gone through.

Women are still breeders, created by god to be given to man to be done with as man pleases, in accord with Allah's will, for example.

Now had the Middle East undergone a radically different kind of evolution that put a damper on islamic influence and opened the way for liberal democracy and freemarket, they could have been way beyond that old islamic fundamentalism that grips the arabic people, by now.

If things went differently 250 years ago in the Middle East, none of this nonsense would be happening right now, and the Middle East would be fully integrated into the United Nations, both diplomatically and economically. Those deserts would be thriving metropolitians with commerce everywhere if they'd have just gotten through the Comtean second stage sooner.

Unfortunately, as it stands, a virgin hotty is still like the most valuable thing a man can have in the Middle East. Next in line of value is a new white Nissan truck.

[accelafine]

Civilizations and societies that evolved technologically at much slower paces due to any number of reasons - inhospitable climate and lack of resource variety, inner-fighting between people because of unstable government, etc. - tend to have customs permitting custodialship over females and much younger marriage and ready-for-reproduction ages. For one, a large family is like having property assests, and two, more childrens to help with the extensive work, and three, people died at early ages so you'd have a large family, expecting to lose one or two people.

That's why the pedocraze still exists in the ideologies of the eastern religions; they're all still second world countries that haven't been through the industrialized liberating transformation of traditional gender roles that western capitalism and liberal democracies have gone through.

Women are still breeders, created by god to be given to man to be done with as man pleases, in accord with Allah's will, for example.

Now had the Middle East undergone a radically different kind of evolution that put a damper on islamic influence and opened the way for liberal democracy and freemarket, they could have been way beyond that old islamic fundamentalism that grips the arabic people, by now.

If things went differently 250 years ago in the Middle East, none of this nonsense would be happening right now, and the Middle East would be fully integrated into the United Nations, both diplomatically and economically. Those deserts would be thriving metropolitians with commerce everywhere if they'd have just gotten through the Comtean second stage sooner.

Unfortunately, as it stands, a virgin hotty is still like the most valuable thing a man can have in the Middle East. Next in line of value is a new white Nissan truck.

Well it didn't, so fuck them.

[Gary Childress]

Re: WW3 breaking out

Let's hope not.

[Gary Childress]

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_ ... tablished/

From the Times of Israel:

27, 2024. (Screen capture/X)
In a recent press conference on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi insisted that Arab and Muslim countries will guarantee Israel’s security if Jerusalem agrees to allow the establishment of a Palestinian state on the pre-1967 lines, while blasting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to do so.

“The Israeli prime minister came here today and said that Israel is surrounded by those who want to destroy it,” Safadi said at a Friday press conference shortly after Netanyahu finished his speech at the UN General Assembly.

“We’re here — members of the Muslim-Arab committee, mandated by 57 Arab and Muslim countries — and I can tell you very unequivocally, all of us are willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state,” Safadi passionately argued.

[Age]

And all thanks to those child-torturing inbred plasticinians.

This one here known as "accelafine" has to be one of the most CLOSED, and thus also STUPID, person here.

LOL This one, actually, BELIEVES, absolutely, that ALL OF THIS is the fault of just "one side" along.

It is not bad enough that this one, again BELIEVES ABSOLUTELY that ALL of the faults of 'the world' is BECAUSE of 'men', again "one side", it also believes that this whole war is due to solely "one side", only, of the "two sides" fighting.

I guess they were desperate to 'get acquainted' with those 72 virgins ('funny' how it has to be virgins). Wokies will be overjoyed. They can build their little 'marxist' utopia after the nuclear winter.

Which would make 'this one' very happy indeed.

Not a single care nor concern of all of the absolutely innocent children who were set on fire, alive, or who were BLOWN TO BITS from the rockets from those on "its side". Just as long as ALL of the "other side", "men", "women", children, and babies, are wiped out, completely, then this is when this one will be 'really happy'.

[Age]

Civilizations and societies that evolved technologically at much slower paces due to any number of reasons - inhospitable climate and lack of resource variety, inner-fighting between people because of unstable government, etc. - tend to have customs permitting custodialship over females and much younger marriage and ready-for-reproduction ages. For one, a large family is like having property assests, and two, more childrens to help with the extensive work, and three, people died at early ages so you'd have a large family, expecting to lose one or two people.

That's why the pedocraze still exists in the ideologies of the eastern religions; they're all still second world countries that haven't been through the industrialized liberating transformation of traditional gender roles that western capitalism and liberal democracies have gone through.

Women are still breeders, created by god to be given to man to be done with as man pleases, in accord with Allah's will, for example.

Here 'we' can clearly see another typical "one sided" indoctrinated view.

Now had the Middle East undergone a radically different kind of evolution that put a damper on islamic influence and opened the way for liberal democracy and freemarket, they could have been way beyond that old islamic fundamentalism that grips the arabic people, by now.

So, instead of having a peaceful and loving tradition, while also 'reacting' to being judged and oppressed, 'they' would have been more like 'you', living in a very judgmental, gun-toting, fearful, and split and divided society, instead.

If things went differently 250 years ago in the Middle East, none of this nonsense would be happening right now, and the Middle East would be fully integrated into the United Nations, both diplomatically and economically.

Which country has caused or created the most wars? Which country has the most, and most deadliest weapons? Which country contains the most feared people? And, in which country do most of its citizens kill 'each other' the most?

Would the people in any other country really want to aspire to live in 'that country', or to be any thing like 'that country'?

If 'the people' in 'that country' were 'different', then 'things', in 'the world', would be a 'lot different' 'now', already.

Those deserts would be thriving metropolitians with commerce everywhere if they'd have just gotten through the Comtean second stage sooner.

'Commerce', and/or having the 'love-of-money' is a huge reason WHY 'some countries' are absolutely 'backwards', even if a lot of its citizens believe otherwise.

And, what I have said here is without even going into man of 'the other things' that 'this one' has completely and utterly MISSED and MISUNDERSTOOD here.

[Age]

And all thanks to those child-torturing inbred plasticinians.

And, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL to do with the "other side" continually occupying, and more and more, and not allowing, right?

This one also, actually, BELIEVES that the torturing of children, even when it is a thousands fold more, is perfectly acceptable and fine, just as long as it is done by those on "its side" of things.

Also, the attempting of 'insults' just shows the 'lack of maturity' by 'this one' here.

[accelafine]

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_ ... tablished/

From the Times of Israel:

27, 2024. (Screen capture/X)
In a recent press conference on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi insisted that Arab and Muslim countries will guarantee Israel’s security if Jerusalem agrees to allow the establishment of a Palestinian state on the pre-1967 lines, while blasting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to do so.

“The Israeli prime minister came here today and said that Israel is surrounded by those who want to destroy it,” Safadi said at a Friday press conference shortly after Netanyahu finished his speech at the UN General Assembly.

“We’re here — members of the Muslim-Arab committee, mandated by 57 Arab and Muslim countries — and I can tell you very unequivocally, all of us are willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state,” Safadi passionately argued.

Would you negotiate with and trust the kind of people who behead babies and burn toddlers alive in front of their parents? And don't forget that there was a 'ceasefire' on at the time. Grow a brain Gary.

[Gary Childress]

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_ ... tablished/

From the Times of Israel:

27, 2024. (Screen capture/X)
In a recent press conference on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi insisted that Arab and Muslim countries will guarantee Israel’s security if Jerusalem agrees to allow the establishment of a Palestinian state on the pre-1967 lines, while blasting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to do so.

“The Israeli prime minister came here today and said that Israel is surrounded by those who want to destroy it,” Safadi said at a Friday press conference shortly after Netanyahu finished his speech at the UN General Assembly.

“We’re here — members of the Muslim-Arab committee, mandated by 57 Arab and Muslim countries — and I can tell you very unequivocally, all of us are willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state,” Safadi passionately argued.

Would you negotiate with and trust the kind of people who behead babies and burn toddlers alive in front of their parents? And don't forget that there was a 'ceasefire' on at the time. Grow a brain Gary.

As opposed to exterminating them to the last believer? Yes. I would negotiate with them. I don't subscribe to the notion that Muslims are a pack of wild animals or whatever that just murder and kill for fun. There seems to be pretty solid evidence that the people of Gaza were in severe deprivation prior to the rocket attacks.

Is Hamas a pack of nefarious scoundrels, yes, as nefarious as they get. But the Palestinian people were living in horrible conditions from what I read, lack of water, lack of food, dirt poverty. Netanyahu gave Hamas a pretty powerful tool of manipulating the people of Gaza--their own suffering. I don't believe for a minute that the Palestinian people in general are any more inhuman than Netanyahu's followers who relentlessly bomb them because they "must". Everybody dehumanizes an enemy in war. "Huns eat babies" and the whole 9 yards. People can be victims of propaganda anywhere anytime unless you take a leap of faith that maybe there's a way beyond the killing.

[accelafine]

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_ ... tablished/

From the Times of Israel:

Would you negotiate with and trust the kind of people who behead babies and burn toddlers alive in front of their parents? And don't forget that there was a 'ceasefire' on at the time. Grow a brain Gary.

As opposed to exterminating them to the last believer? Yes. I would negotiate with them. I don't subscribe to the notion that Muslims are a pack of wild animals or whatever that just murder and kill for fun. There seems to be pretty solid evidence that the people of Gaza were in severe deprivation prior to the rocket attacks.

Is Hamas a pack of nefarious scoundrels, yes, as nefarious as they get. But the Palestinian people were living in horrible conditions from what I read, lack of water, lack of food, dirt poverty. Netanyahu gave Hamas a pretty powerful tool of manipulating the people of Gaza--their own suffering. I don't believe for a minute that the Palestinian people in general are any more inhuman than Netanyahu's followers who relentlessly bomb them because they "must". Everybody dehumanizes an enemy in war. "Huns eat babies" and the whole 9 yards. People can be victims of propaganda anywhere anytime unless you take a leap of faith that maybe there's a way beyond the killing.

Really? Where is that 'evidence'? And if you think that excuses burning children alive in front of their parents and parading raped women around (dead and alive) then you are an even bigger sociopathic schizoid moron than I thought you were. Listen dipshit, Israel left Gaza to its own devices decades ago. If they are living in less than ideal circumstances then that would be because of whoever is in charge there. Perhaps they should have invested all those billions into the region instead of the pockets of its beloved leaders.

[Gary Childress]

Would you negotiate with and trust the kind of people who behead babies and burn toddlers alive in front of their parents? And don't forget that there was a 'ceasefire' on at the time. Grow a brain Gary.

As opposed to exterminating them to the last believer? Yes. I would negotiate with them. I don't subscribe to the notion that Muslims are a pack of wild animals or whatever that just murder and kill for fun. There seems to be pretty solid evidence that the people of Gaza were in severe deprivation prior to the rocket attacks.

Is Hamas a pack of nefarious scoundrels, yes, as nefarious as they get. But the Palestinian people were living in horrible conditions from what I read, lack of water, lack of food, dirt poverty. Netanyahu gave Hamas a pretty powerful tool of manipulating the people of Gaza--their own suffering. I don't believe for a minute that the Palestinian people in general are any more inhuman than Netanyahu's followers who relentlessly bomb them because they "must". Everybody dehumanizes an enemy in war. "Huns eat babies" and the whole 9 yards. People can be victims of propaganda anywhere anytime unless you take a leap of faith that maybe there's a way beyond the killing.

Really? Where is that 'evidence'? And if you think that excuses burning children alive in front of their parents and parading raped women around (dead and alive) then you are an even bigger sociopathic schizoid moron than I thought you were. Listen dipshit, Israel left Gaza to its own devices decades ago. If they are living in less than ideal circumstances then that would be because of whoever is in charge there.

To be blunt, I think your view is the more sociopathic one. As far as evidence, do you think reports of the horrible conditions in Gaza prior to the attacks on Israel were untrue?

[Gary Childress]

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/ ... lockade-un

[accelafine]

As opposed to exterminating them to the last believer? Yes. I would negotiate with them. I don't subscribe to the notion that Muslims are a pack of wild animals or whatever that just murder and kill for fun. There seems to be pretty solid evidence that the people of Gaza were in severe deprivation prior to the rocket attacks.

Is Hamas a pack of nefarious scoundrels, yes, as nefarious as they get. But the Palestinian people were living in horrible conditions from what I read, lack of water, lack of food, dirt poverty. Netanyahu gave Hamas a pretty powerful tool of manipulating the people of Gaza--their own suffering. I don't believe for a minute that the Palestinian people in general are any more inhuman than Netanyahu's followers who relentlessly bomb them because they "must". Everybody dehumanizes an enemy in war. "Huns eat babies" and the whole 9 yards. People can be victims of propaganda anywhere anytime unless you take a leap of faith that maybe there's a way beyond the killing.

Really? Where is that 'evidence'? And if you think that excuses burning children alive in front of their parents and parading raped women around (dead and alive) then you are an even bigger sociopathic schizoid moron than I thought you were. Listen dipshit, Israel left Gaza to its own devices decades ago. If they are living in less than ideal circumstances then that would be because of whoever is in charge there.

To be blunt, I think your view is the more sociopathic one. As far as evidence, do you think reports of the horrible conditions in Gaza prior to the attacks on Israel were untrue?

Can you read?