What do you think ? 💭

[henry quirk]

Words can’t only hands write

Only a literate person can write.

This...

364DF461-2E2B-468C-9811-71D161980396.jpeg

...cannot.

[Iwannaplato]

Once again, 'this one' has completely and utterly, absolutely, 'missed' and misunderstood what 'I' have said, and asked here.

What was it I misunderstood?

And, once again, this is because 'this one' never considered to just seek out and obtain any 'clarification' at all, and instead just preferred to assume some 'thing', from which it then 'jumped to' the conclusion that it is true.

Again, what you said to me regarding my working out who you are, as if it is something that might happen in the future, is off.

Both of the assumptions that you have made here are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

What are the two assumptions I made that are false and where did I make them in what I wrote?

[Fairy]

Words can’t only hands write

Only a literate person can write.

This...364DF461-2E2B-468C-9811-71D161980396.jpeg...cannot.

No writing ever happens without the instrument ( hand/pen in hand) to make it happen.

If Henry, you prefer to say only a literal person can write, not hands, then I fail to see how a person without the instrument to hold the pen can write anything.

That said: concepts like human, hand, pen, are all known to consciousness. The words being read on this screen right now, is appearing to both the consciousness that is here known conceptually as Fairy, as it is to Henry.

As these concepts are known, it also becomes clear to consciousness, that anything that appears to be written and read by every reader reading, is never actual written. All writing that appears to be written, is actually unwritten. These words appearing on the screen of consciousness, are just more illusory appearances within consciousness. They can appear and disappear, like all illusions. Close your eyes, the words disappear, open your eyes, the words reappear.

Words only are known to exist in the light you are. And light is infinitely infinite. Therefore, all words are secondary shadows of the light. The are unwritten.

Fairy Lights, in the dark, illuminating consciousness as this immediate aliveness infinity.

OIP.jpg

Notice that every single fairy light, shares it's light being from the exact same power source. The one appearing as the many, indeed, so amazing.

[Fairy]

Here's a thought for every man who tries to understand
What is in his hands (what's in his hands)
He walks along the open road of love and life
Surviving if he can (surviving if he can)

Bound with all the weight of all the words he tried to say
Chained to all the places that he never wished to stay
Bound with all the weight of all the words he tried to say
As he faced the sun he cast no shadow -Oasis.


You are your own oasis, always home with the beloved, yourself. You never came to earth, because you never left. Home is where the heart is, you are always loved, by you.

[Fairy]

The phrase “the sun that casts no shadow is the caster of all shadows” seems to be a spiritual or philosophical quote. It suggests that a source of ultimate light or truth, which itself is beyond duality or opposition, illuminates and reveals all things. This idea can be found in various spiritual traditions, where the ultimate reality or divine presence is seen as the source of all creation and understanding.

There is only one of us here, thank God. We have the one and only God to thank for that.

My own daughter realised this truth as a young child, and so she decided to check out, leave the world, because she didn't care to live the lies of the shadow world. The lie wasn't for her.

[henry quirk]

No writing ever happens without the instrument ( hand/pen in hand) to make it happen.

No writing ever happens without a literate person to compose then transcribe.

I fail to see how a person without the instrument to hold the pen can write anything.

Speech to text to printer software. Or: a pencil held in the teeth, or between toes, or...

Where there's a (free) will, there's a way.

[bahman]

I’ve answered.

So you believe that I am a human being, not you, and I have the capacity to type?

I know the concept that is “ human being” as an imagined thing in consciousness. And imagined things have no autonomy so they cannot type words. No more than a character in a nightly dream can type words, except in a dream of course.

I am not talking about your conscious imagination of me but the real me.

[Fairy]

No writing ever happens without the instrument ( hand/pen in hand) to make it happen.

No writing ever happens without a literate person to compose then transcribe.

I fail to see how a person without the instrument to hold the pen can write anything.

Speech to text to printer software. Or: a pencil held in the teeth, or between toes, or...

Where there's a (free) will, there's a way.

No will in the world can write a single word without a physical instrument be that instrument a pen in hand, or teeth or toes.

Even speech to text requires a physical tongue.

[Fairy]

So you believe that I am a human being, not you, and I have the capacity to type?

I know the concept that is “ human being” as an imagined thing in consciousness. And imagined things have no autonomy so they cannot type words. No more than a character in a nightly dream can type words, except in a dream of course.

I am not talking about your conscious imagination of me but the real me.

I don’t know another. I only know me.

[Fairy]

All writing is unwritten

All dualities are nondual

There’s only one of us here. There are the appearance of many, the many of the one

That which senses is senseless

That which is seeing is unseen

That which is knowing is unknowing


Say no more

[Age]

Once again, 'this one' has completely and utterly, absolutely, 'missed' and misunderstood what 'I' have said, and asked here.

What was it I misunderstood?

Who and what the 'I' is, exactly, that was being talked, and asked, about, here.

And, once again, this is because 'this one' never considered to just seek out and obtain any 'clarification' at all, and instead just preferred to assume some 'thing', from which it then 'jumped to' the conclusion that it is true.

Again, what you said to me regarding my working out who you are, as if it is something that might happen in the future, is off.

Both of the assumptions that you have made here are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

What are the two assumptions I made that are false and where did I make them in what I wrote?

Where you made them, in what you wrote, is in, exactly, the words that you said and wrote, which I responded directly to with the words, 'Both of the assumptions that you have made here are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

you said and wrote here, 'Again, what you said to me regarding my working out who you are, as if it is something that might happen in the future, is off

your first assumption, which is False, is that I said some thing regarding your, supposed, working out who 'you' are. I never said any thing about you saying some thing regarding you, supposedly, working any thing like this out here.

your second assumption, which is False, is that I said some thing about some thing that might happen in the future. I never said any thing about as if it is some thing that might happen in the future.

Also, and by the way, did you notice, and 'see', what I did here?

After you asked me a 'clarifying question', I then responded to the actual clarifying question, and so answered, and clarified, for you.

Imagine what would happen if you did the same, in return.

Now, can you notice, and see, when you made the assumptions in what you wrote?

If no, then why not, exactly?

[Iwannaplato]

Where you made them, in what you wrote, is in, exactly, the words that you said and wrote, which I responded directly to with the words, 'Both of the assumptions that you have made here are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

You quoting me above....

you said and wrote here, 'Again, what you said to me regarding my working out who you are, as if it is something that might happen in the future, is off

your first assumption, which is False, is that I said some thing regarding your, supposed, working out who 'you' are. I never said any thing about you saying some thing regarding you, supposedly, working any thing like this out here.

Actually, as it says there, I said something about you talking about my working out who you are, not who I am.

You:

If, and when, 'you' work out who 'I' am, exactly, then like "fairy" is saying here, 'you' will, literally, feel and see things differently.

me:

But I know who you are, already. I've met you many times, and not just here at PN. Don't you remember?

In your recent post you have reversed it.

[bahman]

I know the concept that is “ human being” as an imagined thing in consciousness. And imagined things have no autonomy so they cannot type words. No more than a character in a nightly dream can type words, except in a dream of course.

I am not talking about your conscious imagination of me but the real me.

I don’t know another. I only know me.

But you can make distinction between the things are caused by you and the things that are not caused by you.

[Fairy]

I am not talking about your conscious imagination of me but the real me.

I don’t know another. I only know me.

But you can make distinction between the things are caused by you and the things that are not caused by you.

I cam make distinctions yes, conceptually. Via thought here in me, as me, as consciousness here, I can only experience myself, not others. I crave zero access to anything external to my direct consciousness here.

[Age]

Where you made them, in what you wrote, is in, exactly, the words that you said and wrote, which I responded directly to with the words, 'Both of the assumptions that you have made here are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

You quoting me above....

you said and wrote here, 'Again, what you said to me regarding my working out who you are, as if it is something that might happen in the future, is off

your first assumption, which is False, is that I said some thing regarding your, supposed, working out who 'you' are. I never said any thing about you saying some thing regarding you, supposedly, working any thing like this out here.

Actually, as it says there, I said something about you talking about my working out who you are, not who I am.

That was the whole point of what you were, and apparently still are, missing and misunderstanding here.

You:

If, and when, 'you' work out who 'I' am, exactly, then like "fairy" is saying here, 'you' will, literally, feel and see things differently.

me:

But I know who you are, already. I've met you many times, and not just here at PN. Don't you remember?

In your recent post you have reversed it.

Once again, you are completely and utterly missing and misunderstanding things here.