What I stated were the necessary implications of your claim. That is, that unless you can deny these basic scientific facts, then your belief in an eternal universe is unscientific. That was entirely true, and I never even remotely suggested you were aware of the basic implications of your own claim, or had yet admitted them to yourself or to us. But you could now.attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 1:54 pm..yet you don't admit to being unethical in a philosophical debate with me, by removing what I stated and then stating things totally contrary to my statements that you removed.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 1:45 pmTo resort to the ad hominem, instead of speaking about the facts, is simply futile. I'm content not to fashion any response to this.
So there was no deception, and your rant was completely gratuitious.
I get the cause of the impotent rage and bile. I "shot your horse," so to speak, and that made you mad. But a more mature reaction would have been to deal with the facts, not to drop into the ad hominem mode.