A recent "MIRACLE"

[FlashDangerpants]

I won't be wasting any sympathy on you either. You need a doctor, you are a danger to yourself and to others.

You do under_stand that the ONLY time I could be deemed "psychotic" (it's God induced btw) is where I have "eaten" from the Tree of Know_Ledge.
As I have already explained, if I have so much as a little puff on a spliff (for non medicinal reasons) - I am at peace for two weeks - then the words "you crossed the line" (that's the line that God\sage has set for the Life of Brian) - and ----HELL starts - it used to last for 3 months - the last two times I crossed the line - it - the 'psychotic' episode lasted for 6 months - and certainly I will have to resort to killing myself. HENCE Y I don't have anyone around me anymore -most of my friends smoke weed- that partake in that. The amount of times when I came out of HELL mode, and stated to myself I'd never be such a FOOL again and do that - then a month or two later, especially drinking a few bevvies and watching the footy I'd take a puff..idiot. HOWEVER - as I said, if purely to get rid of a headache - NO HELL. Also, there have been a couple of times where I hadn't touched the stuff for maybe a year, and when I really really wanted to get stoned I asked the sage if I could - I was tapped heavily on my right knee - as in RIGHT - I can do it - again -- NO HELL.

So.

Being a rather WISE chap - I decided to fuck off those people that always have weed on them. And boy is life great - two years without - rarely any booze now - clear headed, sharp as a tack - putting up with atheist cockheads like you n Atla.

That was a pile of inane psychotic rambling shit. Plus you went on to blame your recent ban from this site on a drunken binge. Get proper medicine from a doctor please, and stop self-medicating.

I don't mind atheists and debating with them, when they ask the right questions, and are genuinely interested in serious debate without resorting to condescension and continued insistance that the ONLY answer is that I am schizophrenic and not capable of analysing occurences within my own life.

You aren't capable of analysing much of anything. It may be that besides your obvious schizophrenia you are badly hiding a substance abuse problem. Or perhaps that you are also a bit thick. But the good news is that nobody is insisting that "the ONLY answer" is that you are schizophrenic.

[attofishpi]

AGE: There are times you need to back-off and just let things go.

[attofishpi]

I won't be wasting any sympathy on you either. You need a doctor, you are a danger to yourself and to others.

You do under_stand that the ONLY time I could be deemed "psychotic" (it's God induced btw) is where I have "eaten" from the Tree of Know_Ledge.
As I have already explained, if I have so much as a little puff on a spliff (for non medicinal reasons) - I am at peace for two weeks - then the words "you crossed the line" (that's the line that God\sage has set for the Life of Brian) - and ----HELL starts - it used to last for 3 months - the last two times I crossed the line - it - the 'psychotic' episode lasted for 6 months - and certainly I will have to resort to killing myself. HENCE Y I don't have anyone around me anymore -most of my friends smoke weed- that partake in that. The amount of times when I came out of HELL mode, and stated to myself I'd never be such a FOOL again and do that - then a month or two later, especially drinking a few bevvies and watching the footy I'd take a puff..idiot. HOWEVER - as I said, if purely to get rid of a headache - NO HELL. Also, there have been a couple of times where I hadn't touched the stuff for maybe a year, and when I really really wanted to get stoned I asked the sage if I could - I was tapped heavily on my right knee - as in RIGHT - I can do it - again -- NO HELL.

So.

Being a rather WISE chap - I decided to fuck off those people that always have weed on them. And boy is life great - two years without - rarely any booze now - clear headed, sharp as a tack - putting up with atheist cockheads like you n Atla.

That was a pile of inane psychotic rambling shit.

Au contraire - NONE of that is psychotic rambling shit. FACT is, you don't like the fact that the times of "psychosis" (God induced HELL) has an intelligent REASON behind it that you cannot fathom - it smacks against anything reasonable unless God is indeed involved which you cannot accept.

I don't mind atheists and debating with them, when they ask the right questions, and are genuinely interested in serious debate without resorting to condescension and continued insistance that the ONLY answer is that I am schizophrenic and not capable of analysing occurences within my own life.

You aren't capable of analysing much of anything. It may be that besides your obvious schizophrenia you are badly hiding a substance abuse problem. Or perhaps that you are also a bit thick. But the good news is that nobody is insisting that "the ONLY answer" is that you are schizophrenic.

Clearly from what I stated you have the comprehensions skills of an average tadpole.

[Age]

If you say so, but does anything else happen in this, obviously, hypothetical situation, of yours here?

Nothing else of importance.

Does this imply that there was any 'importance' in 'your' already expressed absolute hypothetical situation?

If yes, then what do you imagine that claimed 'importance' was, exactly?

Yup, that's an exaggeration as a mirror. I doubt you can learn from it, but perhaps someone else will get the sad joke of your priorities.

Obviously, once again, you failed completely in understanding what I was actually saying, and meaning.

I wasn't focused on what you meant. I was pointing out the cluelessness/lack of empathy in the priorities you have.

Once again, you completely and utter missed 'the point' I was just making here. That is; what you 'presume' and 'believe' was 'cluelessness/lack of empathy', in my, alleged, 'priorities', did not even exist. Because what you 'believe' were 'my priorities' are, absolutely, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

See, what this one has done, again, here is 'believe' that what is 'sees', 'imagines', and has 'presumed' is true, without gaining actual clarity first, and then 'proceeds on' from that completely False belief of its.

Which is why this one is so Wrong, so often, in regards to its, continual, claims 'about me'.

It has shown and revealed, continually, that it does not matter how much it tries to 'twist' and 'distort' things here, when 'trying to' deflect away from just 'clarifying' its positions and beliefs, that it really has just been getting further and further away from the actual irrefutable Truth here.

Even this one's 'relatively new 'tactic' this time of 'trying out' a 'hypothetical situation', to try to ridicule and humiliate me, has failed absolutely horrendously also, for it.

A perfect example of
Weak Central Coherence is a cognitive style characterized by a focus on local or detailed information at the expense of global or overall context. This means that individuals with weak central coherence tend to concentrate more on specific parts of a situation or object rather than understanding it as a whole.

Yet here you are far more so criticizing for me for speaking generally about all, with and of a global or overall context instead.

Nope. I expected you wouldn't get it.

LOL

Again this one 'tries'.

So, not that you would ever clarify, but what is it, exactly, that you 'expected' 'I' would 'not get', but which you, still, provided it here, in response, 'to me'.

Some could be thinking now that 'you' are trying to say and/or claim things here, in 'a way', 'expecting' that 'I', what you call, 'would not get', in the 'hope' that 'you' 'come across' here appearing 'more smarter' than 'I', or 'more smarter' than what 'you', really, are.

So, will 'you' now explain to the readers here what the 'it' is, exactly, which you 'expected' I would not get?

It is like no matter what I say and write here, you are just intend on only 'seeing' what to ridicule and/or criticize only. No matter how skewed or distorted your interpretation really is.

Ah, now you are starting to notice the face in the mirror, though still only at the level of traits.

Why do you believe, absolutely, that 'I' am doing, what 'you' are clearly doing?

You see the traits but haven't recognized the face.

If 'you' say and believe so, then it must be so, correct?

Also, could it at all be a possibility that 'I' have been putting 'a mirror' here, 'up to you'?

Or, is this not a possibility in 'your world' here?

[attofishpi]

Oi! Y did you wimp out on this bit...!!? (bit of a kunt arn't I )

You've started at least 7 entire threads in a bid to get my attention. Such as this one yesterday.
viewtopic.php?p=727640#p727640

SEVEN!!? - please list the other 6 that are dedicated to you, you narcissistic muppet.

I don't hate you, although with all this fascism you have been doing recently

What "FASCISM" - simpletons as yourself appear to believe anyone that loves their country, is proud to fly the Union or St George flag as 'fascist'..do you actually know what the term means? ..or have you some ACTUAL dirt on me that supports your thus far ridiculous claim?

[Age]

You didn't ask me for clarification.

I did not need to.

I only addressed the very thing that you actually did and what was blatantly obvious.

So, when you do this, assume what was blatently obvious, it is fine.

LOL

1. I am, again, not assuming.

2. When I just point out what you actually do, for example, then there is nothing 'to assume'.

3. Why are you, absolutely, 'stuck' in 'believing', absolutely, that I am being 'hypocritical' here?

The answer, by the way, is absolutely obvious. That is; when you also learn and know how to 'look at' and 'see' things for how they are, exactly.

When others do this, it is not fine, they should have have asked for clarification.

you are, absolutely, stuck here "iwannaplato". Although I have explained this numerous times to you, already.

If you do some thing here, which can be proved True by the very words under the label and name "iwannaplato" here, then there is absolutely nothing at 'to assume'.

I was just addressing what you just, obviously, did.

Are you aware of the contents of the hundreds of other posts I have read of attofishpi's?

Only if I have already read them.

Have I already read those posts?

No.

Why did you, once again, 'jump' to 'a conclusion', before you ever 'waited' for 'clarification'?

Are you aware of just how many times that you, actually, do this?

And, are you aware of the very reason why you, continually, do this?

Or, are you aware of why you, continually, keep doing this very thing, which has been what has kept you, continually, miss what has and is being pointed out, and why you, continually, go astray, here?

Is it possible that my knowledge of what he was conveying and the attitudes he has came from information you were unaware I had? Yup.

Of course. But, this has absolutely nothing at all to do with what I was addressing and pointing out here.

And, you would be aware and 'know' this, already, if you only stopped missing out on what is actually being said, and meant, here, by me.

Yet, you assumed things about me, and simply stated them.

Here 'this one', again, makes claims and accusations 'about me'. And, what it will, now, show and reveal is that when I ask it to clarify, and/or back up and support, its claim/s or accusation/s, then it will not.

What are the, exact, 'things', which you presume or believe that I have 'assumed' here, 'about you', "iwannaplato"?

When other people, in your estimation, make assumptions instead of asking clarifying questions first, you judge them and describe what they did as you did in relation to me.

Once again, what is with the 'judging' word here?

Now, in 'what way' do you believe, absolutely, that I was 'judging' 'them'?

And, this is not even going into the Fact that I did not even make absolutely any assumption here.

This one, really, is absolutely 'stuck' here.

And, the very reason why it is, I have expressed and explained, numerous times already. Not that I would be surprised at all if this one has missed absolutely every one of those times.

When you do it, it is because you believe it is all blatently obvious.

LOL This here could not be more false, more wrong, more inaccurate, and more Incorrect.

Hypocrite again.

LOL This one has just, once again, proved the very reason why it is absolute stuck where it is here.

Once more, for you "iwannaplato".

1. I neither believe nor disbelieve any thing here.

2. I was not assuming any thing here. I was just addressing, or pointing out, what you, actually, did do. Which is proved by the 'very words' that you used.

3. So, because I was not 'assuming' any thing, (like you believe, absolutely, and claim I was), I could not have 'believed' I was ''assuming' for any reason.

4. Therefore, your yet to be clarified already presumed absolute true conclusion here is absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

5. Although you will, continue, to believe, absolutely, that you are not wrong and not mistaken here, at all.

But you simply cannot admit this kind of thing because it cuts into your false sense of self, your overweening ego.

you, still, cannot 'see' that I was just addressing the actual words that you put on the screen here. Nor can you 'see' that absolutely no 'assumption' was done, nor even needed, by me.

And, again, the very reason why you are, absolutely, 'blind' here is very, very obvious. Well to me anyway.

It would call into question too much.

If you say and believe so.

But, are you able to actually 'question' what you believe is true here?

And so one can expect more LOLs and 'this one has completely..... etc.

When one is so, so Wrong and Incorrect, then what do you expect, exactly?

Also, and by the way, even after all of our back and forth discussions you, still, do not yet even 'know' what LOL means here.

But, then again, you have, actually, missed, misinterpreted, and/or misunderstood just about absolutely everything else that I have said and written in our conversations.

That you're just another human being doing the very things you have come to teach us about...you can't face that.

And, what is 'that', exactly, which 'I' have, supposedly, come to 'you', human beings, about?

Can you and will you, at least, just 'clarify' the claims and accusations that you have made 'about me', this time?

Should 'we' 'expect' that you will not?

[Age]

Firstly, it did not take you long at all.

Secondly, it is amazing that you, continually, keep 'only seeing' what you believe exists. Even though it is obvious and provable that is is not even there.

Thirdly, you have, again, missed what is here. Which is not surprising at all considering just how much, and how often, you Truly do miss, and/or misunderstand, what is, actually, here.

The usual posturing and lack of substance. That's what you bring to threads.

Okay.

But you do not, right?

[Age]

Those are all completely stupid

There does not seem to be any thing new coming through, nor anymore clarity being added.

Little more need be said of floppititwank's illustrations than that they are moronic. One of them is just anagrams of "pantheism", it does include "He Spit Man" which is of course humorously homoerotic, but does not include the altogether more important "pint shame" which is something totalfishpoo should experience daily judging by state of his drunken ramblings.

Now fuck off and bother somebody who cares about you.

Here 'we' have another who has 'grown up' with the 'maturity' to 'come back' with, 'Now fuck off'.

And, said and exclaimed within a philosophy forum of all places.

[Age]

There does not seem to be any thing new coming through, nor anymore clarity being added.

Little more need be said of floppititwank's illustrations than that they are moronic. One of them is just anagrams of "pantheism", it does include "He Spit Man" which is of course humorously homoerotic, but does not include the altogether more important "pint shame" which is something totalfishpoo should experience daily judging by state of his drunken ramblings.

pint shame <-- that's a good one!!

Part of the reason I have stopped drinking aside from the fact that I ramble drunkenly -- is that God\sage have made it clear that they want me to stop - even to the point of annoying me almost akin to HELL mode.

PA <-- GOD

Pa_annoyed. thus Pa will... Pa_annoya.
..which HE does, although in a milder manner than actual HELL.

So many answers to this intelligence referred to as God is embedded in the English language.

Were you yet aware that what you are saying and claiming is 'annoying you' here is just the already existing 'internal knowing' within.

Which, by the way, is within all bodies, equally.

And, that some have just 'learned' how to 'listen' to the 'irrefutable knowing' better than others have.

Also, what you say and claim here about 'it' being 'embedded' in the "english language" 'you' have only just scrapped the tinniest tip of "attofishpi".

Wait till you get down 'much deeper', where the, actual, irrefutable proof 'lies'. (Just to add another twist on 'things' here.)

If only 'you', people and posters here, back when this was being written could, also, 'see' the actual words being said and used here, and the actual deeper 'underlying' meaning within and behind them, which is what actual proves, or refutes, absolutely what is being said and claim here. 'you' also would 'see' just how funny and humorous this forum really is, and was.

What you are missing out is the actual proof you need to back up, support, and justify your latest and newest claim about what God is exactly you have been saying, writing, and using here, but of which you are just still unaware of.

[attofishpi]

AGE: Please only address people that are addressing you. In other words - stop barging in to others conversations.

You have no idea how much you are destroying threads because people have to scroll through shitloads of your CRAP to get to conversations that they are actually interested in.

[Age]

...pfff. I tried so hard...naaaw..

PS. Just how much do you hate me?

You've started at least 7 entire threads in a bid to get my attention. Such as this one yesterday.
viewtopic.php?p=727640#p727640

SEVEN!!? - please list the other 6 that are dedicated to you, you narcissistic muppet.

I don't hate you, although with all this fascism you have been doing recently

What "FASCISM" - simpletons as yourself appear to believe anyone that loves their country, is proud to fly the Union or St George flag as 'fascist'..do you actually know what the term means? ..or have you some ACTUAL dirt on me that supports your thus far ridiculous claim?

I won't be wasting any sympathy on you either. You need a doctor, you are a danger to yourself and to others.

You do under_stand that the ONLY time I could be deemed "psychotic" (it's God induced btw) is where I have "eaten" from the Tree of Know_Ledge.
As I have already explained, if I have so much as a little puff on a spliff (for non medicinal reasons) - I am at peace for two weeks - then the words "you crossed the line" (that's the line that God\sage has set for the Life of Brian) - and ----HELL starts - it used to last for 3 months - the last two times I crossed the line - it - the 'psychotic' episode lasted for 6 months - and certainly I will have to resort to killing myself. HENCE Y I don't have anyone around me anymore -most of my friends smoke weed- that partake in that. The amount of times when I came out of HELL mode, and stated to myself I'd never be such a FOOL again and do that - then a month or two later, especially drinking a few bevvies and watching the footy I'd take a puff..idiot. HOWEVER - as I said, if purely to get rid of a headache - NO HELL. Also, there have been a couple of times where I hadn't touched the stuff for maybe a year, and when I really really wanted to get stoned I asked the sage if I could - I was tapped heavily on my right knee - as in RIGHT - I can do it - again -- NO HELL.

So.

Being a rather WISE chap - I decided to fuck off those people that always have weed on them. And boy is life great - two years without - rarely any booze now - clear headed, sharp as a tack - putting up with atheist cockheads like you n Atla.

I don't mind atheists and debating with them, when they ask the right questions, and are genuinely interested in serious debate without resorting to condescension and continued insistance that the ONLY answer is that I am schizophrenic and not capable of analysing occurences within my own life.

LOL 'Debating' only happens when those talking have a 'belief' or a 'disbelief'.

And, as the past few thousand years of human history, hitherto when this is being written, 'debating' is not a very satisfactory form of finding solutions nor conclusions. Which is why 'I' do not do 'debate'.

Also, every intended 'logical reasoned discussion', begun to find 'a conclusion' ends up in a 'debate' when 'beliefs' or 'disbelief' is introduced into the discussion. Which is another reason why you human beings were so very, very slow to 'catch up' and also find out and uncover what the irrefutable Truths, in Life, really are.

You should be banned from this forum for your behaviour.

How much did you plead to Rick for that? You once asked me how I managed to return to the forum that I must have done some serious grovelling..no, Rick simply banned me for a week - due to my dropping the C bomb on Will (he annoyed me re a graph while I drank too many expresso martinis n beers)

Why is it 'the other's fault', to you, why you do what you do?

You should not be left unattended near schools or allowed onto aeroplanes at all.

So anyone with a certificate of acceptance into the world of "schizophrenia" must be banned from such activities?

Does any one, really, want to get 'accepted' in some so-called 'world' of 'schizophrenia'?

If yes, then why would that be?

[Age]

The fundamental, or underlying, message that you are wanting to get across here is irrefutably True, Right, Accurate, and Correct. However, saying things like you just did here, out of annoyance, frustration, or anger, which are obviously absolutely False are not helping any one here.

I DONT LIE

Really?

Every adult human being lies. But, supposedly, the one known here as "attofishpi" does not.

Well that is what it says and claims anyway.

[accelafine]

I like the painting.

Thanks.

What about the others?

Are they all your work? Are they actual paintings or computer generated garbage?

If they are actual paintings then I have to admit they are pretty good. You could probably make a lot of money selling them on the internet.

[Age]

AGE: There are times you need to back-off and just let things go.

Like 'what', for example?

[Age]

You do under_stand that the ONLY time I could be deemed "psychotic" (it's God induced btw) is where I have "eaten" from the Tree of Know_Ledge.
As I have already explained, if I have so much as a little puff on a spliff (for non medicinal reasons) - I am at peace for two weeks - then the words "you crossed the line" (that's the line that God\sage has set for the Life of Brian) - and ----HELL starts - it used to last for 3 months - the last two times I crossed the line - it - the 'psychotic' episode lasted for 6 months - and certainly I will have to resort to killing myself. HENCE Y I don't have anyone around me anymore -most of my friends smoke weed- that partake in that. The amount of times when I came out of HELL mode, and stated to myself I'd never be such a FOOL again and do that - then a month or two later, especially drinking a few bevvies and watching the footy I'd take a puff..idiot. HOWEVER - as I said, if purely to get rid of a headache - NO HELL. Also, there have been a couple of times where I hadn't touched the stuff for maybe a year, and when I really really wanted to get stoned I asked the sage if I could - I was tapped heavily on my right knee - as in RIGHT - I can do it - again -- NO HELL.

So.

Being a rather WISE chap - I decided to fuck off those people that always have weed on them. And boy is life great - two years without - rarely any booze now - clear headed, sharp as a tack - putting up with atheist cockheads like you n Atla.

That was a pile of inane psychotic rambling shit.

Au contraire - NONE of that is psychotic rambling shit. FACT is, you don't like the fact that the times of "psychosis" (God induced HELL) has an intelligent REASON behind it that you cannot fathom - it smacks against anything reasonable unless God is indeed involved which you cannot accept.

Do you 'know', or do you believe that you 'know', what the 'intelligent reason' is for what you call and refer to as, 'God induced HELL', here on earth, to you "attofishpi", while you are 'alive'?

If yes, then what is 'that intelligent reason', exactly?

I don't mind atheists and debating with them, when they ask the right questions, and are genuinely interested in serious debate without resorting to condescension and continued insistance that the ONLY answer is that I am schizophrenic and not capable of analysing occurences within my own life.

You aren't capable of analysing much of anything. It may be that besides your obvious schizophrenia you are badly hiding a substance abuse problem. Or perhaps that you are also a bit thick. But the good news is that nobody is insisting that "the ONLY answer" is that you are schizophrenic.

Clearly from what I stated you have the comprehensions skills of an average tadpole.