A recent "MIRACLE"

[Iwannaplato]

But some like "accelafine" might say that it is not the 'insanity' that needs to be questioned here.

Obviously.

[Age]

I mean, this is where posting this has led to. It seems to me if a deity tossed a miracle your way, it wouldn't be for the purpose of calling a woman a hateful slag. What the hell do your fantasies about her sexual behavior, and your hatred of whatever you think it is, have to do with anything?

*fantasies of sexual behaviour WTF are u talking about?

Slag, you do know what that word means, right?

Once again, what 'we' have here is another example of these people, back then, believing that their own personal definition for a word is the 'right one'.

They seemed to continually forget that just about every word can have varying numbers of 'different definitions', while none ever being 'the Right one'. They also did not seem to realize that some words even have completely opposing definitions, which explains, partly, why there was so much conflict, bickering, and confusion 'among them'.

Now, what does the word 'slag' mean, to you "iwannaplato", exactly?

[Age]

*fantasies of sexual behaviour WTF are u talking about?

Slag, you do know what that word means, right?

..sure, but it doesn't me I am fantasising sexually..anymore than I believe in any literal consideration within me that she is a "slag" ----simply is an anger response to continually being called a "psychotic freak" simply for speaking about things that occur in my REAL_IT_Y.

Well, obviously, if you just reminded the readers here that what you are expressing, and claiming, is only in relation to 'your own reality', only, then you might not get called a "psychotic freak" as much.

Also, why does someone of 'your age' simply have 'anger responses'? And, 'anger responses' from just 'words alone', and/or from just being called some thing?

From my observations I know people express 'anger responses' when the Truth is being told 'about them'.

[Age]

Slag, you do know what that word means, right?

..sure, but it doesn't me I am fantasising sexually..anymore than I believe in any literal consideration within me that she is a "slag" ----simply is an anger response to continually being called a "psychotic freak" simply for speaking about things that occur in my REAL_IT_Y.

You of all people must know what's been going on in England. 'Psychotic freaks' keep going around stabbing random people for nothing.

Well this is obviously False.

So yeah, not exactly my favourite kind of people.

What are 'your' 'favorite kind' of people, exactly?

[Iwannaplato]

..pretty certain you with your insatiable misery are on a path for suicide. There were times I thought you had the intellect for more, but alas ---the great gurgler of life awaits silly miserable hateful slags as U.

I mean, this is where posting this has led to. It seems to me if a deity tossed a miracle your way, it wouldn't be for the purpose of calling a woman a hateful slag. What the hell do your fantasies about her sexual behavior, and your hatred of whatever you think it is, have to do with anything?

Have you forgotten, "attofishpi" is 'analyzing minds' here.

Dave is slapping a woman in a room. Stan reacts critically to this. Age enters the room and asks Stan, the one reacting to the violence critically, if he has forgotten that Dave is interested in studying idioms in English and that the woman is producing idioms in response to the slaps.

Yup, that's an exaggeration as a mirror. I doubt you can learn from it, but perhaps someone else will get the sad joke of your priorities.

A perfect example of
Weak Central Coherence is a cognitive style characterized by a focus on local or detailed information at the expense of global or overall context. This means that individuals with weak central coherence tend to concentrate more on specific parts of a situation or object rather than understanding it as a whole.

[Iwannaplato]

*fantasies of sexual behaviour WTF are u talking about?

Slag, you do know what that word means, right?

Once again, what 'we' have here is another example of these people, back then, believing that their own personal definition for a word is the 'right one'.

They seemed to continually forget that just about every word can have varying numbers of 'different definitions', while none ever being 'the Right one'. They also did not seem to realize that some words even have completely opposing definitions, which explains, partly, why there was so much conflict, bickering, and confusion 'among them'.

Now, what does the word 'slag' mean, to you "iwannaplato", exactly?

Notice that you start by just assuming you understand what I said to him.

You didn't ask me for clarification. You believed you knew it was an example of what you said it was an example of.

Hypocrite.

Infinite regress maker.

[Age]

..sure, but it doesn't me I am fantasising sexually..anymore than I believe in any literal consideration within me that she is a "slag" ----simply is an anger response to continually being called a "psychotic freak" simply for speaking about things that occur in my REAL_IT_Y.

You go down in the soul and these word choices have dreck around them. I've been pissed off at accelefine and she at me and we've thrown some pretty hard words at each other, but I never feel the urge to call her slag or slut, etc.

So what?

Does this make 'you' somehow 'better' than "attofishpi", or somehow 'more' than "attosfishpi", or somehow 'different' than "attofishpi"?

If it is the latter, then how, exactly?

And, I am almost absolutely certain that "attofishpi" does not feel the urge to do some of things that you do "iwannaplato"?

Now, obviously, you have not had the lived experiences that "attofishpi" has had. So, that you, supposedly, never feel the urge to call "accelafine" a slag or a slut, like "attofishpi" is solely because of your different 'lived experiences'.

Also, why do you not have the urge to call some one some thing that they, "themselves", might call "them" 'self'?

Her being a woman - if she is one or not who knows - has nothing to do with any problem with her I or you might have. It's an old, old hatred, deep down in the recesses of the mind/soul, and clustered over fear, that hates women for being sexual.

Is this the reason why you hate 'those' that you do?

you know 'those ones' when you feel 'the urge' to call them 'idiotic', et cetera, and do call 'them' as such.

You may think it's just an insult you plucked down off the insult shelf, but it's not.

So, if 'it' is not just an 'insult plucked down off the so-called, insult shelf', then what is 'it', exactly, and literally?

And I have little interest in another version of a deity who hates women.

Some have little interest in your own personal views and opinions here, as well.

And, especially so when you will not clarify.

Because women are sexual, so men need to get over, at root, hating women for it, just as any deity who hates women needs to also.

LOL Why would you assume or believe that a so-called 'deity' would hate women.

That would be a contradiction of terms.

I've seen this shit aimed at women in my life and the damage it does, the damage it can do even when unexpressed but palpable and I'm tired of it.

But, you are, obviously, not tired of the other attempts at insults, which you express, right?

Any surrounding communication is just blah, blah, blah if that shit is present.

Does this apply when your so-called 'shit' is also present?

[Age]

Oh right. Poor you. You seem to have the memory of a goldfish, and your insults to me always involve comments about my alleged age and/or something involving sex or sexuality, or both.
Not that I care. Your opinion of me means nothing.

your responses appear to reveal the very opposite. Well to me anyway.

And what repsonse did you expect to your ridiculous story anyway?

Obviously 'any'.

After all this thread is, supposedly, for 'analyzing minds'.

[Age]

---atto---

---thinks you---

---may still have an interest in PHILOSOPHY---

Is this just random bollocks:

A man's best friend will BARK up the Tree of KNOW_LEDGE SAP...LEAVE...LOG_I_C behind.....

Just out of curiosity, do you think or believe that this kind of responding, from you, is helping you here?

[Iwannaplato]

So what?

Does this make 'you' somehow 'better' than "attofishpi", or somehow 'more' than "attosfishpi", or somehow 'different' than "attofishpi"?

If it is the latter, then how, exactly?

And, I am almost absolutely certain that "attofishpi" does not feel the urge to do some of things that you do "iwannaplato"?

Now, obviously, you have not had the lived experiences that "attofishpi" has had. So, that you, supposedly, never feel the urge to call "accelafine" a slag or a slut, like "attofishpi" is solely because of your different 'lived experiences'.

Also, why do you not have the urge to call some one some thing that they, "themselves", might call "them" 'self'?

So, as usual, nothing of substance to say about the post that was not directed at you.

Because women are sexual, so men need to get over, at root, hating women for it, just as any deity who hates women needs to also.

LOL Why would you assume or believe that a so-called 'deity' would hate women.

yet, again showing the limitations of your communication.

That would be a contradiction of terms.

Exactly.

I've seen this shit aimed at women in my life and the damage it does, the damage it can do even when unexpressed but palpable and I'm tired of it.

But, you are, obviously, not tired of the other attempts at insults, which you express, right?

You seem to lack the understanding of the difference between reacting to what a person is doing and someone hating a woman for being a woman.

I know you're upset that I've insulted you, but this kind of sophistry in comparison is just silly on your part.

And it's really cool to see what you think the priority problem to focus on in this discussion was.

[accelafine]

For fuck sake. Would people at least glance at their posts before submitting them? Stop 'quoting' comments as mine that have nothing to do with me!
Is it really that difficult to use the 'quote' function?

[Age]

Does your psychiatrist know you don't take your medication? It's dangerous to do that.

What part of I fucked off the psychiatrist back in 2017 - once I got what I wanted out of them do you not understand?

How do you currently keep the so-called "centrelink twats" off of 'your back', now "attofishpi"?

It's amazing that people go to UNI and think they comprehend me and my analysis of reality and my own self BETTER than me - insisting I need to take their experiments (pills)

Do you think or believe that you comprehend others and their analysis of reality and "their" own 'self' BETTER than them?

And, are you even aware that the saying, 'their own self', is an absolute oxymoron and contradiction of terms?

IDIOT(s) I used them and the system (but only because they are arrogant within their bookworming - not comprehending shite about REAL_IT_Y and certainly NO comprehension of GOD.)

Are you open, at all, to God not being real?

[Age]

Cool. As you prefer. But haven't you asked yourself why your God only talks to you!?

The voices in his head told him to nail his own foot to the floor or something, and he did it. Perhaps God only talks to people dumb enough to take an order like that.

Ah, ye of zero comprehension. Twas no order, twas the reckoning that ye of atheistic no idea will never comprehend. AGAIN, I will never return to the Tree of Know Ledge.

Yep, the Life of Brian is something to behold. Turns out Christ can't be bothered to return so alas, I have a job to do in time.

But, what the word 'jesus', and the words 'second coming', meant and refer to, exactly, has already occurred and happened. But, obviously, some here have not has this revealed to them, yet.

[Age]

Ah, ye of zero comprehension. Twas no order, twas the reckoning that ye of atheistic no idea will never comprehend. AGAIN, I will never return to the Tree of Know Ledge.

Yep, the Life of Brian is something to behold. Turns out Christ can't be bothered to return so alas, I have a job to do in time.

I take back what I said earlier. You are most definitely insane (or drunk?).

I honestly hope God does not will me to do it - go to London, speakers corner and instil the wrath of God upon 1 Muslim that will be forced under God's duress to pass it on to another 6 within 6 hrs where all will have to do like_wise until the wrath of chaos and the job of making them all fall to their knees to Christ on fear of burning for eternity as the Sun of man is freed from their consciousness

I've got better things to do, like learn how to sail a catamaran

Such is the Life of Brian T ...DO_U_BT



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YuAzR2XVAM

Again, you are not making things better for 'you' here.

[attofishpi]

Slag, you do know what that word means, right?

For the record I didn't realise slag is the same as slut. I'd never call anyone a slut..

The context I use for slag, is someone that needs to chip off the slag - as in a requirement to chip off the crap that is making them less than they should be. In accefalines case - constantly calling me a fat ugly stupid schizophrenic lends me to suggest she needs to do some chipping off of her bad bits..that is all.