"age" verses "quirk"

[henry quirk]

It's the immovable versus the irresistible: stymied.

[Atla]

We're rooting for the caveman here

[henry quirk]

Place your bets, gents.

[henry quirk]

Irrelevant.

What have I stolen, age? Please, tell me.

[henry quirk]

Raising him up has been an honor and privilege, and my life would surely be poorer had he not been central to it.

Why do you call 'it' 'your kid'?

You might wanna read it again. It, in context, doesn't refer to my kid.

What could have possibly been a so-called 'heartache', to you, just 'rearing' a human child "henry quirk"?

Even if I were inclined to explain, you wouldn't understand; but, I'm not inclined to explain cuz the details of our lives aren't your business.

Do you notice any contradictions or inconsistencies here?

No. If you do, spell them out.

[henry quirk]

Irrelevant.

What have I stolen, age? Please, tell me.

[henry quirk]

So, this one will just 'take' another's life, although it claims that everyone has a 'natural right' to life.

Animals aren't people.

[henry quirk]

Irrelevant.

What have I stolen, age? Please, tell me.

[henry quirk]

Why do you believe, absolutely, "henry quirk" that the human animal is, laughingly, so-called 'important', while the rest are not?

Human beings are people.

[henry quirk]

Irrelevant.

What have I stolen, age? Please, tell me.

[Age]

Raising him up has been an honor and privilege, and my life would surely be poorer had he not been central to it.

Why do you call 'it' 'your kid'?

You might wanna read it again. It, in context, doesn't refer to my kid.

I never ever thought the word 'it' referred to the human child that you call 'your kid'.

Maybe you want to stop assuming things, and just answer the actual clarifying question I ask you, and do it openly and honestly.

But, if you do not, yet, understand the question I ask you, then assuming things will not necessarily help you at all. As just proved True here, once again.

What could have possibly been a so-called 'heartache', to you, just 'rearing' a human child "henry quirk"?

Even if I were inclined to explain, you wouldn't understand; but, I'm not inclined to explain cuz the details of our lives aren't your business.

Once again, these ones here would prefer to make up an 'excuse' for when they are could not or did not want to just be open and honest and clarify.

Do you notice any contradictions or inconsistencies here?

No. If you do, spell them out.

Once again, 'I' am not here as a slave for 'you'.

[Age]

So, this one will just 'take' another's life, although it claims that everyone has a 'natural right' to life.

Animals aren't people.

But you humans are animals, obviously.

[Age]

Why do you believe, absolutely, "henry quirk" that the human animal is, laughingly, so-called 'important', while the rest are not?

Human beings are people.

No they are not.

Obviously 'human beings' are human beings. Whereas, and just as obvious, 'people' are people.

There is a reason why you human beings have created and use different words.

'People' are not 'human beings', and, 'human beings' are not 'people'. Again, for obvious reasons.

[Flannel Jesus]

Why do you believe, absolutely, "henry quirk" that the human animal is, laughingly, so-called 'important', while the rest are not?

Human beings are people.

No they are not.

Obviously 'human beings' are human beings. Whereas, and just as obvious, 'people' are people.

There is a reason why you human beings have created and use different words.

'People' are not 'human beings', and, 'human beings' are not 'people'. Again, for obvious reasons.

What are the obvious reasons? Which people aren't human beings? Which human beings aren't people? And why?

[henry quirk]

But, you will not correct it either, right "henry quirk"?

Not for Harbal's benefit, no.