"age" verses "quirk"

[henry quirk]

if "he", or "she", is holding what you call 'your toothpick' or 'your mouldy piece of bread', and they are trying to leave, then you can just shoot them, right?

If someone steals from me, it's morally A-Ok for me to stop him, yes (and that might very well mean I shoot him). I'll say it again: if I catch Zeb stealin' my water, it's moral for me to stop him any way I can which might mean shootin' him. Further, if I didn't catch him, but know he made off with my water, I can go gunnin' for him (and hope the hangman isn't hangin').

So, are you 'now' saying and claiming that you would wait?

I'm sayin' it wouldn't be just to shoot for any other reason than defense of my, or another's, life, liberty, or property.

why is a human being's life have less significance to you than a toothpick or a mouldy piece of bread? Or, are those things only hold more significance to, you, over a human life when you believe things are 'yours'?

The real question: why does Zeb place more value on my water than he does his own life?

you 'now' saying and claiming that if you awoken, for example, by someone who had already stepped into what you call 'your house', then you would just wait to see what they will do, and only after they have picked some thing up and was then trying to leave, then, and only then, you would shoot them?

What I'm sayin': it's 3am. A noise down the hall wakes me. I look down the hall and see Zeb with my water. I'm gonna yell and then I'm gonna shoot. If Zeb values his life, liberty, and property he ought not risk 'em breakin' into my house and tryin' to make off with my water.

Oh, so 'now', as long as the previous owner/s are what you would call 'dead', then you have 'justified', to "yourself" alone, that it is 'now yours', right?

I'll say it again: if someone believe they have a prior claim on my property, step up, present the claim, and we'll work it out.

What do you think or believe I am delusional about here, exactly?

Everything.

-----

Why would you have even begun to presume such a Truly False thing as this here, let alone that you have already concluded and believes that it is True?

Becuz: you recognized and acknowledged it's theft instead of just a casual, innocent touch. Sorry, you can't take it back. You demonstrated discernment and you're on the hook for it.

To me, expressing the desire to shoot at human beings, with weapons you have obtained, more than once is 'often' enough for me to focus on.

Gotcha.

Obviously you still wish that there were more others under you that you could control and order around.

If you truly understood me you'd never post such a stupid comment.

And here is, exactly, why this one is only 'seeing' what it does here.

Likewise, I'm sure.

What are you so afraid of..."henry quirk"?

Burning to death. Being eaten by a shark. Being sewn into a human centipede. You know: the standard stuff. You?

[Age]

if "he", or "she", is holding what you call 'your toothpick' or 'your mouldy piece of bread', and they are trying to leave, then you can just shoot them, right?

If someone steals from me, it's morally A-Ok for me to stop him, yes (and that might very well mean I shoot him).

LOL
LOL
LOL

This here is a prime example of just how selfish and greedy the adult human being had become, back in the 'olden days', when this was being written.

They, literally, would shoot a human being (dead or not it did not matter to them), over just a toothpick or even over just a mouldy piece of bread. And, the worse and most disturbing part of all of this is they had and would 'justify' this, well to "themselves' only, as being perfectly 'morally okay', of all things.

I'll say it again: if I catch Zeb stealin' my water, it's moral for me to stop him any way I can which might mean shootin' him. Further, if I didn't catch him, but know he made off with my water, I can go gunnin' for him (and hope the hangman isn't hangin').

Just how greedy and selfish some had become, like for example this one here known as "henry quirk", was, literally, frightening, which explains why they had also become so absolutely scared and paranoid, exactly like "henry quirk" is here.

So, are you 'now' saying and claiming that you would wait?

I'm sayin' it wouldn't be just to shoot for any other reason than defense of my, or another's, life, liberty, or property.

LOL

This one would shoot, and kill, another human being over water of all things, itself, which is, and was, a Truly abundant, self-cleansing thing, which is, literally, freely available to everyone.

But, there were people like "henry quirk" who, literally, False believed that it owned or had 'some right' over some of it.

The amount of this one's distortions and delusions just keep growing.here.

why is a human being's life have less significance to you than a toothpick or a mouldy piece of bread? Or, are those things only hold more significance to, you, over a human life when you believe things are 'yours'?

The real question: why does Zeb place more value on my water than he does his own life?

1. The 'real question' was the one I asked you here, which you are very obviously trying your hardest to ignore, get out of answering and clarify, and trying to deflect from.

For reasons which are plainly obvious to the more observant readers here.

2. The absolute hilarious attempts that this one would go, as seen here, to 'try to justify' its very disturbing distorted delusions never seem to decrease.

"zeb" might just be, literally, 'dying' of thirst, but "henry quirk" would still shoot "zeb" 'dead' if "henry quirk" thought or believes that that 'life giving water' was "henry quirk's', laughingly, 'own water'.

you 'now' saying and claiming that if you awoken, for example, by someone who had already stepped into what you call 'your house', then you would just wait to see what they will do, and only after they have picked some thing up and was then trying to leave, then, and only then, you would shoot them?

What I'm sayin': it's 3am. A noise down the hall wakes me. I look down the hall and see Zeb with my water. I'm gonna yell and then I'm gonna shoot. If Zeb values his life, liberty, and property he ought not risk 'em breakin' into my house and tryin' to make off with my water.

The absolute greediness and selfishness that the adult human being had evolved with and had become is blatantly obvious here, and can be clearly seen here by "henry quirk's" very disturbing, distorting, and delusions views and beliefs

Also, what happens if "zeb", or "zelda" does not have, laughingly, what you call 'your water', then what do you do? Do you just let them walk around?

After all they are in what you believe and call is 'your house'

Oh, so 'now', as long as the previous owner/s are what you would call 'dead', then you have 'justified', to "yourself" alone, that it is 'now yours', right?

I'll say it again: if someone believe they have a prior claim on my property, step up, present the claim, and we'll work it out.

But, you might shoot them, dead or not, before they even got to speak, let alone if they said that they are going to take back what is theirs. you obviously already believe, absolutely, that 'that land' is 'yours'. So, it would not matte what absolutely anyone said, obviously if they are trying to take what you believe is yours, then you will shoot them.

What do you think or believe I am delusional about here, exactly?

Everything.

......

LOL
LOL
LOL

Why would you have even begun to presume such a Truly False thing as this here, let alone that you have already concluded and believes that it is True?

Becuz: you recognized and acknowledged it's theft instead of just a casual, innocent touch.

No I never. you are letting your delusional assumptions and beliefs get in the way here again "henry quirk".

Sorry, you can't take it back. You demonstrated discernment and you're on the hook for it.

And, you are absolutely closed. Again, because of your beliefs here.

To me, expressing the desire to shoot at human beings, with weapons you have obtained, more than once is 'often' enough for me to focus on.

Gotcha.

So, you at least have understood one thing here

Obviously you still wish that there were more others under you that you could control and order around.

If you truly understood me you'd never post such a stupid comment.

But, it was from your very own words where I got that from.

And here is, exactly, why this one is only 'seeing' what it does here.

Likewise, I'm sure.

So, 'why', exactly?

Show the readers here what you have actually learnt and understood here,

When anyone looks into this fully, the actual Truth is obvious.

What are you so afraid of..."henry quirk"?

Burning to death. Being eaten by a shark. Being sewn into a human centipede. You know: the standard stuff.

So, being seen as being Wrong, contradictory, inconsistent, and hypocritical as well, as these were the so-called 'standard stuff', of the adult human beings, well in the days when this was being written anyway.

You?

Me, nothing.
By the way, you purposely misquoting, to try to decide e the readers, here did not go unnoticed.

[henry quirk]

The 'real question' was the one I asked you here

No, it was mine.

what happens if "zeb", or "zelda" does not have, laughingly, what you call 'your water', then what do you do? Do you just let them walk around?

Zeb or Zelda broke into my house at 3am. What do you think I'm gonna do?

But, you might shoot them, dead or not, before they even got to speak

Why would I do that?

No I never.

Yeah, you did.

But, it was from your very own words where I got that from.

No, it wasn't.

So, 'why', exactly?

Cuz you're deranged: that's why.

When anyone looks into this fully, the actual Truth is obvious.

So: when are you gonna look into this fully?

So, being seen as being Wrong, contradictory, inconsistent, and hypocritical as well, as these were the so-called 'standard stuff', of the adult human beings, well in the days when this was being written anyway.

Nah, none of that bothers me. Being sewn into a human centipede, that bothers me.

Me, nothing.

Are you blind too? that's a Daredevil reference

-----

Show the readers here what you have actually learnt and understood here,

I'm not your slave, age. Quit tellin' me what to do.

[Age]

The 'real question' was the one I asked you here

No, it was mine.

So, to you, there can not be two so-called 'real questions', right?

what happens if "zeb", or "zelda" does not have, laughingly, what you call 'your water', then what do you do? Do you just let them walk around?

Zeb or Zelda broke into my house at 3am. What do you think I'm gonna do?

Here is another prime example of how these people, 'back then' would not just answer and clarify.

For the very reasons I have already provided.

But, you might shoot them, dead or not, before they even got to speak

Why would I do that?

Because you believe that they are either;

Going to steal 'your stuff'.

Going to harm you. Or,

Have already just already 'broken into you house'.

Oh, and if course, you have no issue at all with shooting human beings, with weapons you have acquired to use against them.

you do shoot human beings, dead or not, if they so-call break into your house', right?

No I never.

Yeah, you did.

Okay. If this is what you want to believe is true, then I will leave you with this belief of yours.

But, it was from your very own words where I got that from.

No, it wasn't.

And, you know this how, exactly?

So, 'why', exactly?

Cuz you're deranged: that's why.

Okay

Could you be Wrong here?

Or, is this just an absolute impossibility, to you?

When anyone looks into this fully, the actual Truth is obvious.

So: when are you gonna look into this fully?

When am I going to look into what, exactly?

And, what do you think 'I' would find 'there' when I did "henry quirk"?

So, being seen as being Wrong, contradictory, inconsistent, and hypocritical as well, as these were the so-called 'standard stuff', of the adult human beings, well in the days when this was being written anyway.

Nah, none of that bothers me.

Really?

your words, and/or non words, here show absolutely otherwise.

Being sewn into a human centipede, that bothers me.

Me, nothing.

Are you blind too? that's a Daredevil reference

I was just answering and clarifying the clarifying question that you asked me.

So, what are you talking about here, now.

Show the readers here what you have actually learnt and understood here,

I'm not your slave, age. Quit tellin' me what to do.

Great point "henry quirk", and also very True.

Now, will you show the readers here what you have actually learned and understood here?

If no, then why not?

Are you afraid of some thing here?

[henry quirk]

So, to you, there can not be two so-called 'real questions', right?

Sure, there can be two real questions, but, here, only one was and it wasn't yours.

just answer and clarify.

I would shoot them, age. Clear enough?

Because you believe that they are either;

Going to steal 'your stuff'.

Going to harm you. Or,

Have already just already 'broken into you house'.

No age. Son of Squatting Bear knocks on my door, sez he has a prior claim to my property, I'm not gonna shoot him. What I'll do is say Let's see the proof, bub.

Where we go from there is on him.

And, you know this how, exactly?

Becuz you never get anything anyone sez right.

Could you be Wrong here?

No.

When am I going to look into what, exactly?

Whatever it is you referred to when you posted...

When anyone looks into this fully, the actual Truth is obvious.

And, what do you think 'I' would find 'there' when I did "henry quirk"?

The actual, obvious truth.

Really?

Yes.

your words, and/or non words, here show absolutely otherwise.

No, they don't.

Great point "henry quirk", and also very True.

All my points are great.

Now, will you show the readers here what you have actually learned and understood here?

What have I learned here? Not a damn thing.

What do I understand? That you're wrong and I'm right.

Are you afraid of some thing here?

Like I say: burning to death, being eaten by a shark, being sewn into a human centipede. You know: the standard stuff.

[Age]

So, to you, there can not be two so-called 'real questions', right?

Sure, there can be two real questions, but, here, only one was and it wasn't yours.

Well this is another way of trying to deflect and get out of just being open, honest, answering and clarifying.

just answer and clarify.

I would shoot them, age. Clear enough?

'Clear enough' in relation to what, exactly?

Also, that took so much longer than was necessary.

So, again, you say and claim that every human being has a 'natural right' to life, however you also say and claim that you would shoot human beings, and thus 'take from them' their, supposed 'natural right to life'.

And, that you cannot see and comprehend just how contradictory and hypocritical this, really, is when everyone else here can 'speaks of', shows, reveals just how Truly closed, blind, and deaf you really are here "henry quirk".

Because you believe that they are either;

Going to steal 'your stuff'.

Going to harm you. Or,

Have already just already 'broken into you house'.

No age. Son of Squatting Bear knocks on my door, sez he has a prior claim to my property, I'm not gonna shoot him. What I'll do is say Let's see the proof, bub.

And, you want the 'proof' on paper, right?

Where we go from there is on him.

But never on you, right?

If yes, then this is because how you mis/behaviour in Life is not your responsibility at all, correct?

If someone tried to 'make of with' what you vary Falsely call 'your land', 'your water', or 'your toothpick' and what you do is always 'up to them', correct?

If no, then why do you continually say and claim 'what happens' is up to the other?

And, you know this how, exactly?

Becuz you never get anything anyone sez right.

LOL "henry quirk".

So, to "henry quirk" absolutely every thing every one says I cannot get 'it' right.

I now wonder if I have got this right, and, if "henry quirk" is right here?

Could you be Wrong here?

No.

you are beyond delusional.

This one is not just showing and revealing how absolutely closed it is but also how absolutely delusional it really is.

When am I going to look into what, exactly?

Whatever it is you referred to when you posted...

So, do you or do you not even know?

When anyone looks into this fully, the actual Truth is obvious.

And, what do you think 'I' would find 'there' when I did "henry quirk"?

The actual, obvious truth.

Which is 'what', exactly?

Really?

Yes.

your words, and/or non words, here show absolutely otherwise.

No, they don't.

you could not be more closed here "henry quirk"

Great point "henry quirk", and also very True.

All my points are great.

Now, will you show the readers here what you have actually learned and understood here?

What have I learned here? Not a damn thing.

This can be clearly seen

What do I understand? That you're wrong and I'm right.

About 'what', exactly?

Are you afraid of some thing here?

Like I say: burning to death, being eaten by a shark, being sewn into a human centipede. You know: the standard stuff.

you obviously, once again, are completely missing things here.

And, once again, this is because you are absolutely closed here.

[henry quirk]

So, again, you say and claim that every human being has a 'natural right' to life

Yes.

however you also say and claim that you would shoot human beings, and thus 'take from them' their, supposed 'natural right to life'.

No.

And, you want the 'proof' on paper, right?

Sure as shit: I won't turn over lock, stock, and barrel becuz of the unverified word of stranger, so -- yeah -- he better be able to prove his claim.

But never on you, right?

Not in this situation. He came to me; I didn't go to him.

absolutely every thing every one says I cannot get 'it' right.

Oh, you might; you haven't yet.

"henry quirk" is right here?

I'm always right.

So, do you or do you not even know?

I do; you don't.

Which is 'what', exactly?

You're wrong; I'm right.

About 'what', exactly?

Everything.

you obviously, once again, are completely missing things here.

No, you are.

[Age]

So, again, you say and claim that every human being has a 'natural right' to life

Yes.

however you also say and claim that you would shoot human beings, and thus 'take from them' their, supposed 'natural right to life'.

No.

Why do you say, 'No', here?

What do you actually relieve happens when you shoot human beings 'dead', with the weapons you have bought for killing things?

Do you seriously believe you have not taken the 'natural right to life' after you have 'taken the life', from another?

Are you able to explain how 'killing: some thing is not 'taking it's natural right to life'?

If yes, then will you?

If no, then why not?

And, you want the 'proof' on paper, right?

Sure as shit: I won't turn over lock, stock, and barrel becuz of the unverified word of stranger, so -- yeah -- he better be able to prove his claim.

It is this kind of mentality why 'the world' became and was in the absolute mess that it was in, back in those very 'olden days' when this was being written.

And, this was not the worst part. The worst part was these people could not see, because, once again, they were blinded by their own assumptions and beliefs.

But never on you, right?

Not in this situation. He came to me; I didn't go to him.

Again, the absolute lack of responsibility "men" had and held for their own mis/behaviors, like this one obviously has here, explains why 'the world' became, and was, so messed up, 'back then'.

absolutely every thing every one says I cannot get 'it' right.

Oh, you might; you haven't yet.

The absolute stupidity, which comes from being absolutely closed, is seen, absolutely clearly, here.

To this one there is a not a single time that I had ever gotten absolutely any thing right in regards to what these people said here.

And, 'you' thought human beings could not have been this stupid and closed 'back then', but here is the irrefutable Truth, coming straight from 'their mouths', as it was said.

"henry quirk" is right here?

I'm always right.

Okay. Now what I had to deal with is absolutely clear and obvious.

So, do you or do you not even know?

I do; you don't.

Yet it was you who still has not yet clarified here.

And, considering that 'we' are discussing my words, then that you actually believe 'you know' and 'i do not' is even more farcical now.

Which is 'what', exactly?

You're wrong; I'm right.

About 'what', exactly?

Everything.

Do you purposely want to come across as being absolutely closed, and thus absolutely stupid? Or, do you not even realise that you are doing this?

you obviously, once again, are completely missing things here.

No, you are.

LOL

you do not even know what I am referring to, exactly. So, you could not come across any more absurd and ridiculous now.

[henry quirk]

Why do you say, 'No', here?

Why do you think I said no? Becuz you got it wrong, again, that's why.

Do you seriously believe you have not taken the 'natural right to life' after you have 'taken the life', from another?

I seriously believe I've defended my own or another's. Again: if you value your life, liberty, and property, don't try to deprive another of his.

Are you able to explain how 'killing: some thing is not 'taking it's natural right to life'?

I have (just above, in fact).

there is a not a single time that I had ever gotten absolutely any thing right

Exactly.

Yet it was you who still has not yet clarified here.

It's your job to clarify your questions, not mine. Can you? I don't think so.

[Age]

Why do you say, 'No', here?

Why do you think I said no? Becuz you got it wrong, again, that's why.

So, this one actually believes that when it 'takes the life' of another, then it is not 'taking the, natural right to, life', of the other.

Which is even more absolutely illogical, nonsensical, and irrational.

This one actually believes that it is able to 'justify' the 'unjustifiable'.

Which had become a common occurrence among the adult human being population, back in those olden days when this was being written.

Do you seriously believe you have not taken the 'natural right to life' after you have 'taken the life', from another?

I seriously believe I've defended my own or another's.

So, to this one, someone's toothpicks or pieces of mouldy bread hold more significance than 'your life' does.

And, it believes that 'killing you' is defending its, or a very select few other's, toothpicks is 'justifiable'.

Although it still says and claims that 'you' had a 'natural right' to life.

Again: if you value your life, liberty, and property, don't try to deprive another of his.

Does this apply to you also?

If yes, then anyone can come and 'kill' you, and do this 'justifiably' so to you, if you just try to make off with another's stuff, or just try to deprive them of theirs, right?

Are you able to explain how 'killing: some thing is not 'taking it's natural right to life'?

I have (just above, in fact).

LOL

This one actually believes that 'killing' living things, including the 'killing' of you human beings, is not 'taking your 'natural right' to life'.

there is a not a single time that I had ever gotten absolutely any thing right

Exactly.

And that you actually believe this to be absolutely true shows and proves just how Truly stupid you really are being here.

Yet it was you who still has not yet clarified here.

It's your job to clarify your questions, not mine. Can you? I don't think so.

Once again, your attempts at trying to deceive here does not go unnoticed.

you claimed that you knew what was going on here, and I did not. But, considering the actual fact that you claimed this in regards to my words, and thus in regards to what I was actually intending and meaning, shows and proves just how lost and Truly closed and stupid you really are here.

[henry quirk]

Does this apply to you also?

Absolutely.

anyone can come and 'kill' you, and do this 'justifiably' so to you, if you just try to make off with another's stuff, or just try to deprive them of theirs, right?

If I steal, I ought to expect to be resisted, and possibly off'd, yes.

you claimed that you knew what was going on here, and I did not

You don't; I do.

[Age]

Does this apply to you also?

Absolutely.

anyone can corme and 'kill' you, and do this 'justifiably' so to you, if you just try to make off with another's stuff, or just try to deprive them of theirs, right?

If I steal, I ought to expect to be resisted, and possibly off'd, yes.

And, what you 'ought to expect', does not mean that you actually do, right?

Now, so because you have stolen stuff in the past, then you have lost your 'natural right' to life, and thus to keep living, and so you can 'now' be 'killed', or so-called 'offed' if you would prefer, 'justifiably do', correct?

Ought you be expecting this?

you claimed that you knew what was going on here, and I did not

You don't; I do.

Even with some thing as obvious as this here you are still completely closed, and thus completely blind to as well.

So, "henry quirk" believes, absolutely, that it knows what is going on here, and that I do not at all, absolutely.

Yet, and absolutely hilariously so, it still has not idea nor even a clue as to what it is that I am talking about and referring to here.

[henry quirk]

And, what you 'ought to expect', does not mean that you actually do, right?

because you have stolen stuff in the past

What have I stolen?

[Age]

And, what you 'ought to expect', does not mean that you actually do, right?

because you have stolen stuff in the past

What have I stolen?

What you have.

And, what you are 'now'.

[henry quirk]

What you have.

Such as?

And, what you are 'now'.