Teach Your Children Well

[Walker]

LOL "walker".

Yes, for example, the thread title narrows the cause of the disease that has carried you away, and the disease is whatever it is you are clinging to, a clinging that in your demonstrable case, has resulted in formulaic (which by now is probably integrated into knee-jerk) postings applied to diverse topics repeated oft' enough as to be tedious, a being which has been confirmed by independent sightings, all of which points to the need for more contemplation and less trolling in order to perceive the obvious that would have bitten you if it was a snake.

Uh huh.

This, because this one believed, and maybe still believes, that "women" have to have abortions. And, they have to have abortions because they were not taught well, and everyone knew 'this one and only reason'.

Perhaps this line of reasoning, which is the same as before but worded differently, from the same set of facts from which your delusion derived, will dawn the light of adult and philosophical understanding, for Age.

- A raped woman who has an abortion, did so because she had to have an abortion.
- A raped woman who does not have an abortion, does not have an abortion, because she did not have to have an abortion.
- Although various factors contribute to each need, the factor common to both needs, is how they were taught and what they understand from the teachings that invariably occur during the course of upbringing.
- Shirley, this is simple enough to understand.

- In the USA, more women had abortions in the year after the SCOTUS Dobb’s decision, than in the year before the decision, when Roe vs Wade was in effect.
- This indicates that appropriately ceding the regulation of abortion to the states does not restrict access to abortion, despite the hysterical lying of the Left.
- The Dobb’s decision says that abortion is not a constitutional right, and that the states are to decide the rules for violating Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, for those who think those in the womb are human beings, and for those who don’t.

[Age]

Yes, for example, the thread title narrows the cause of the disease that has carried you away, and the disease is whatever it is you are clinging to, a clinging that in your demonstrable case, has resulted in formulaic (which by now is probably integrated into knee-jerk) postings applied to diverse topics repeated oft' enough as to be tedious, a being which has been confirmed by independent sightings, all of which points to the need for more contemplation and less trolling in order to perceive the obvious that would have bitten you if it was a snake.

Uh huh.

This, because this one believed, and maybe still believes, that "women" have to have abortions. And, they have to have abortions because they were not taught well, and everyone knew 'this one and only reason'.

Age, you can stop with the idiot act, anytime. As you've been taught here, and which you've ignored in favour of childish, delusional conclusions, any woman who gets an abortion, had to have an abortion. The logic is unassailable.

What you seem to be completely keep forgetting is 'have to' is absolutely relative. So, what is a 'have to' to one is certainly not, to another.

Not all "women" 'have to' have an abortion.

your attempts at ridicule and humiliate by using the 'childish' word is, also, not going unnoticed.

By the way, 'your logic' that "women" have abortions because of 'unwell teachings' is not Accurate and Correct because some "women" have abortions because of other reasons. But, that "men", like you, who continually focus on "women", and continually on them doing what you consider as 'wrong' is a result of your very :unwell upbringing'.

Also, my so-called 'little time out' did not last long at all. Could you not have extended it a bit longer?

[Age]

How next-gen ultrasounds are changing the abortion debate
https://nypost.com/2022/10/22/how-next- ... on-debate/

But in her search for a medical professional who could confirm she was pregnant, Sarah — who lacked health insurance at the time — decided to schedule a free ultrasound while still in her first trimester. “It started with me just kind of googling free ultrasounds, and then it turned into a whole thing, with me making a decision to keep the pregnancy right there on the spot.”

Sarah, who’d had an abortion a year prior, realized as soon as she saw the baby on the screen that she wanted to go through with this pregnancy.

“I was feeling guilty about doing it again, under a very similar situation,” she recalled. “But because I had an ultrasound, I decided to have my son. It had only been a year [since my last abortion], so the universe was telling me I was going to be a mother — and that I was going to do it with or without the father.”

Comment: It’s good for women to know what they are killing when they get an abortion, rather than hide behind the debunked, unscientific “clump of cells” rationalization. In the article, once the woman was taught well with the ultrasound that in fact that was a growing human in her tummy, she realized that the societal teachings of abortion being her only option, were false. She had a moment of clarity and realized that she did not have to have an abortion ... and so she didn't. The ultrasound machine taught her well, with life as the measure.

So, people should go to 'ultrasound machines' for Life's 'well teachings', correct?

[Walker]

What you seem to be completely keep forgetting is 'have to' is absolutely relative. So, what is a 'have to' to one is certainly not, to another.

No. Everyone has to do what they do, but not everyone has to do the same thing. We've been over this. That you do not pay attention is because you have to not pay attention.

Why?

Because your comments rely on it, and obviously, you cannot not comment.

[Walker]

Also, my so-called 'little time out' did not last long at all. Could you not have extended it a bit longer?

Absolutely. Before you leave your timeout and post again, first ask permission.

[Walker]

your attempts at ridicule and humiliate by using the 'childish' word is, also, not going unnoticed.

Good. Maybe someday you'll have to stop being childish and your thinking will improve past weak, irrational, gottcha comments ...

... but if not, the reason will be because you have to continue being childish and obtuse, at the time before this was written in the history of the world because who knows, humans have the unpredictable capacity to change overnight, which obviously has happened to Trump given his visage on Monday night, and between now and the next you might change like a bolt out of the blue and stop clinging to what has caused that disease which has carried you away into the hoodo that you do.

Question: How like you the conversational, run-on sentences?

[Age]

What you seem to be completely keep forgetting is 'have to' is absolutely relative. So, what is a 'have to' to one is certainly not, to another.

No. Everyone has to do what they do, but not everyone has to do the same thing.

So, you 'had to' write that sentence that you did, and had absolutely no choice at all, right?

And, whatever you answer, or not, you have absolutely no choice over at all also, correct?

Also, if your responses are Right, or Wrong, or Correct, or Incorrect, you have absolutely no way of changing either, right?

We've been over this. That you do not pay attention is because you have to not pay attention.

And, that you are Wrong and Incorrect here is because you have to be, right?

Why?

Because your comments rely on it,

My comments, supposedly, rely on 'what', exactly?

And, if you are Wrong here, then you cannot help this, right?

and obviously, you cannot not comment.

[Age]

Also, my so-called 'little time out' did not last long at all. Could you not have extended it a bit longer?

Absolutely.

But, you have no control at all right, because you have to do what you do, no matter how bad and Wrong it is that you do, correct?

Before you leave your timeout and post again, first ask permission.

But, you responding means that any so-called and imagined 'time out' was e ded by you. But, then again you have absolutely no choice over what happens here, nor 'to you'., right?

[Age]

your attempts at ridicule and humiliate by using the 'childish' word is, also, not going unnoticed.

Good. Maybe someday you'll have to stop being childish and your thinking will improve past weak, irrational, gottcha comments ...

Why do you believe the 'childish' word is an attempt at humiliation and ridicule?

I, suppose, you also believe that calling another a "girl" or a "women", who is not, is an attempt at humiliation and ridicule as well. Is this right?

... but if not, the reason will be because you have to continue being childish and obtuse, at the time before this was written in the history of the world because who knows, humans have the unpredictable capacity to change overnight, which obviously has happened to Trump given his visage on Monday night, and between now and the next you might change like a bolt out of the blue and stop clinging to what has caused that disease which has carried you away into the hoodo that you do.

But, then again, you had absolutely no choice at all to just say and what what you did, and will, here, right?

Question: How like you the conversational, run-on sentences?

I do not understand this question, which you had to pose and write here.

Also, do you look to that human being known as "donald trump" as a God because you were taught well, because it is, or, because you just have to?

[Walker]

The Clockwork Condition
The author comments on his most famous book, in 1973.
By Anthony Burgess
May 28, 2012

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012 ... _brand=tny

Sean O’Faolain, in his autobiography, records an inability to reconcile man’s free will with God’s total knowledge which was resolved—in a sudden magical or miraculous flash of insight—one day before a taxi ride in Manhattan. O’Faolain put it to himself this way: Any action of man remained a free action until it was performed. Once performed, it became something God had willed. He and the taxi-driver got drunk on this discovery. - Anthony Burgess

[Walker]

The Clockwork Condition
The author comments on his most famous book, in 1973.
By Anthony Burgess
May 28, 2012

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012 ... _brand=tny

Sean O’Faolain, in his autobiography, records an inability to reconcile man’s free will with God’s total knowledge which was resolved—in a sudden magical or miraculous flash of insight—one day before a taxi ride in Manhattan. O’Faolain put it to himself this way: Any action of man remained a free action until it was performed. Once performed, it became something God had willed. He and the taxi-driver got drunk on this discovery. - Anthony Burgess

Comment: An unperformed action is not an action, let alone a free action.

[Walker]

Cluelessness does not teach the children well, as this short clip illustrates.

“You don’t want to be late for school, son.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M5aRJIH6Gc

[Age]

Cluelessness does not teach the children well, as this short clip illustrates.

“You don’t want to be late for school, son.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M5aRJIH6Gc

you are right. And, as you just illustrated.

[Walker]

Just imagine if knowing was nothing more than correcting a ration of false assertions.

Hmmm. That could not be. Why?

Because knowing requires correcting the outlook that generates all those false assertions, and that outlook can generate those assertions forever and ever more, as has been proven time after time, no matter which avenue one strolls down to avoid contamination by this disease.

This is likely because the objective created by all the not-knowing is not to know, but rather, is something else. I think that in your case Age, we can agree on that much. That much is the basis.

[Age]

Just imagine if knowing was nothing more than correcting a ration of false assertions.

Hmmm. That could not be. Why?

Because knowing requires correcting the outlook that generates all those false assertions, and that outlook can generate those assertions forever and ever more, as has been proven time after time, no matter which avenue one strolls down to avoid contamination by this disease.

This is likely because the objective created by all the not-knowing is not to know, but rather, is something else. I think that in your case Age, we can agree on that much. That much is the basis.

Just so you become and are fully aware, I have absolutely no idea nor clue as to what you are saying, meaning, nor referring to here, at all.