A Return to the Topic of Consciousness

[Flannel Jesus]

you seem to forget that you are in a public 'philosophy forum', from which anyone can 'look at' and 'see' what you are saying, and doing, here.

You're the one who keeps forgetting that this is a public forum and anyone can see that the problem is with you, not with me/us.

Yeah, Age, you got this one wrong. And the people of the future see it too.

[Age]

Oh, and by the way "flannel jesus", was it you, or was it not you, who wanted 'some actual arguments, from me, that 'that' is the case, instead of just stating it'?'

If yes, then did you miss where I provided some, for you?

If yes, then they are there.

Then WHERE they are?

Did you mean, 'Then WHERE are they?'

They are in this thread.

Have you, really, this completely MISSED them?

This is the internet.

Okay.

You can link to things.

Okay.

Are you incompetent to link to things?

Considering that I have linked to things previously, I will let you make of this as you will.

Do you not know how to use this forum software?

Yes.

[Flannel Jesus]

Oh, and by the way "flannel jesus", was it you, or was it not you, who wanted 'some actual arguments, from me, that 'that' is the case, instead of just stating it'?'

If yes, then did you miss where I provided some, for you?

If yes, then they are there.

Then WHERE they are?

Did you mean, 'Then WHERE are they?'

They are in this thread.

Have you, really, this completely MISSED them?

This is the internet.

Okay.

You can link to things.

Okay.

Are you incompetent to link to things?

Considering that I have linked to things previously, I will let you make of this as you will.

Do you not know how to use this forum software?

Yes.

I've already told you I haven't seen them. You know I haven't seen them. I am starting to surmise they the reason you keep asking if I've missed them, when you already know the answer, is because they're either not there or you don't actually want me to see them.

Link to them, or prove to the forum and everyone from the future that your are a liar and coward.

[Age]

you seem to forget that you are in a public 'philosophy forum', from which anyone can 'look at' and 'see' what you are saying, and doing, here.

You're the one who keeps forgetting that this is a public forum and anyone can see that the problem is with you, not with me/us.

Okay.

So, 'we' are back to 'the problem', (whatever that is exactly), once again, comes 'back to me', when this is being written anyway, and never to anyone else here.

Also, claiming that 'I' am 'the one' who, supposedly, 'keeps forgetting' that this is a public forum, in consideration of what I have been actually saying here, could sound like another one of the most absurd, nonsensical, and irrational claims that you continually make here.

[Age]

you seem to forget that you are in a public 'philosophy forum', from which anyone can 'look at' and 'see' what you are saying, and doing, here.

You're the one who keeps forgetting that this is a public forum and anyone can see that the problem is with you, not with me/us.

Yeah, Age, you got this one wrong. And the people of the future see it too.

'I', supposedly, got 'what', exactly, wrong here?

[Flannel Jesus]

you seem to forget that you are in a public 'philosophy forum', from which anyone can 'look at' and 'see' what you are saying, and doing, here.

You're the one who keeps forgetting that this is a public forum and anyone can see that the problem is with you, not with me/us.

Yeah, Age, you got this one wrong. And the people of the future see it too.

'I', supposedly, got 'what', exactly, wrong here?

The idea that because it's a public forum and people can see what's going on, it makes atla look bad somehow and not you.

[Atla]

[Age]

Then WHERE they are?

Did you mean, 'Then WHERE are they?'

They are in this thread.

Have you, really, this completely MISSED them?

This is the internet.

Okay.

You can link to things.

Okay.

Are you incompetent to link to things?

Considering that I have linked to things previously, I will let you make of this as you will.

Do you not know how to use this forum software?

Yes.

I've already told you I haven't seen them.

But, you do not have to 'keep' telling me, or others, that you have not 'seen' them.

It is blatantly obvious that you missed them, and 'keep' missing them.

Are you aware that if you never 'look back', in this thread, then you will always 'keep' not having 'seen' them?

You know I haven't seen them.

Considering that it was 'I' who first informed 'you' that you missed them, what you say here could have gone 'without saying'.

I am starting to surmise they the reason you keep asking if I've missed them, when you already know the answer, is because they're either not there or you don't actually want me to see them.

When you say, 'them', what are you referring to, exactly?

See, maybe 'we' are just talking 'passed' each other because 'we' are talking 'about' different things here.

Link to them, or prove to the forum and everyone from the future that your are a liar and coward.

But, most of the human beings who have read this thread, who did not miss them, already 'know' that they are here, in this thread.

'I' am not sure how you could have, actually, missed them here. They are not that far back to find, and 'see'.

But, obviously, the more you keep responding, without going looking, the further you will have to go back.

If I recall correctly, 'they' were presented in only a couple of posts after you told me to: Quit talking about doing it and do it.

Which if I recall correctly would only be one or so pages back from this one. Or about fifteen or so posts back. Maybe if you actually read the actual words in the actual posts I have written, after you wanted me to give 'them' to you, then you would have 'seen' them, and not have 'missed' them.

But, just let 'us' know if you are, still, having some difficulty here locating them. I will see if I can be assistance to you in some other way.

[Age]

Yeah, Age, you got this one wrong. And the people of the future see it too.

'I', supposedly, got 'what', exactly, wrong here?

The idea that because it's a public forum and people can see what's going on, it makes atla look bad somehow and not you.

Oh okay.

So, 'i' have gotten 'this' wrong, as well, right?

Also, and by the way, I never ever had absolutely any 'idea' that "atla" would look so-called 'bad', just so you become aware.

[Flannel Jesus]

'I', supposedly, got 'what', exactly, wrong here?

The idea that because it's a public forum and people can see what's going on, it makes atla look bad somehow and not you.

Oh okay.

So, 'i' have gotten 'this' wrong, as well, right?

Also, and by the way, I never ever had absolutely any 'idea' that "atla" would look so-called 'bad', just so you become aware.

You're not fooling anybody. Everyone here speaks English better than you. "This is a public forum" has obvious implications

[Flannel Jesus]

. .

If I recall correctly, 'they' were presented in only a couple of posts after you told me to: Quit talking about doing it and do it.

Your response to that post of mine was this

viewtopic.php?p=717954#p717954

Where instead of providing the argument, you said you already had

[Age]

The idea that because it's a public forum and people can see what's going on, it makes atla look bad somehow and not you.

Oh okay.

So, 'i' have gotten 'this' wrong, as well, right?

Also, and by the way, I never ever had absolutely any 'idea' that "atla" would look so-called 'bad', just so you become aware.

You're not fooling anybody.

Okay. So, 'I' have now had 'this' right, all along?

Everyone here speaks English better than you.

Okay, And, this is in relation to 'what', exactly?

"This is a public forum" has obvious implications

Okay. And, what are those, supposed, 'obvious implications', to you, exactly?

[Age]

. .

If I recall correctly, 'they' were presented in only a couple of posts after you told me to: Quit talking about doing it and do it.

Your response to that post of mine was this

viewtopic.php?p=717954#p717954

Where instead of providing the argument, you said you already had

Oh, so you are, 'now', not actually interested in the 'actual arguments', themselves, and instead you are just interested in regards to where they were before, right?

If yes, then if I recall correctly, they would also be in this thread, as well, in either page 1 or page 2, or both, of this thread.

[Flannel Jesus]

. .

If I recall correctly, 'they' were presented in only a couple of posts after you told me to: Quit talking about doing it and do it.

Your response to that post of mine was this

viewtopic.php?p=717954#p717954

Where instead of providing the argument, you said you already had

Oh, so you are, 'now', not actually interested in the 'actual arguments', themselves, and instead you are just interested in regards to where they were before, right?

If yes, then if I recall correctly, they would also be in this thread, as well, in either page 1 or page 2, or both, of this thread.

I have no idea what you're talking about, and that makes sense because neither do you.

[Flannel Jesus]

Everyone here speaks English better than you.

Okay, And, this is in relation to 'what', exactly?

To you trying to gaslight people about what you meant when you did the whole "this is a public forum" bit, obviously. The fact that you couldn't tell that, even given that that was the only possible context of words, proves how little you understand English.

This forum is for English language discussions, you might be in the wrong place. Try to find a forum for whatever language you speak.