Let's look like and talk like "age", again.

General chit-chat

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Let's look like and talk like "age", again.

Post by Flannel Jesus »

In the days when this was written, I decided to make a sister thread to this thread. In that thread, the goal is to look at and talk about age.

In this thread, as the title suggests, the idea is to look like and talk like age.

With all that said, I'll go first.

The details of my life are quite inconsequential.... Very well, where do I begin? My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low-grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a 15-year-old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize; he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes, he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament... My childhood was typical: summers in Rangoon... luge lessons... In the spring, we'd make meat helmets... When I was insolent I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds — pretty standard, really. At the age of 12, I received my first scribe. At the age of 14, a Zoroastrian named Vilmer ritualistically shaved my testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn scrotum — it's breathtaking... I suggest you try it.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8532
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Let's look like and talk like "age", again.

Post by Iwannaplato »

First I would like to point out that you assumed I didn't know those things. But, 'we' do really understand 'you' human beings, already. Although obviously 'you' do not really understand human beings, 'yet', when this is being written. So far you have not evolved, "Flannel Jesus" beyond the human being stage. "Once what the 'you' IS is KNOWN, to one, then that 'one' will KNOW how the 'you' can NOT evolve passed the human being stage"

To write as if I didn't know what was important to know about 'you' is to try to bring me down to the human being level and perspective of things here. WHY do 'you' KEEP 'TRYING', SO HARD, to bring 'Me' DOWN to the human being LEVEL, and PERSPECTIVE, OF 'things' here?

When you communicate this to me, it confirms something I knew. I KNOW. And FROM 'the way' 'you', adult human beings, communicate WITH "each other", in the days when this is being written, there is NO WONDER WHY 'you' ALL talk PAST, BICKER, ARGUE, FIGHT, and even WAR WITH and KILL "each other". So, I am CERTAINLY NOT GOING TO BE FOLLOWING 'your' LEADS, in the days when this is being written.

I will keep this simple AND the REASON I DO NOT MAKE ANY 'thing' MORE COMPLEX IS BECAUSE 'you', human beings, ARE the ONLY 'things' that MAKE MORE COMPLEX 'that', which IS ESSENTIALLY NOT COMPLEX AT ALL and which NEVER NEEDS TO BE MADE 'MORE COMPLEX' NEITHER..

Or, in other words, what I AM DOING here, in general, is DOING what I THINK it TAKES, which WILL CREATE A MUCH BETTER 'world' FOR 'children', in general.

So-called "writers", or you 'human beings' if you like, are not worthy of capital letters, at the beginning of individual names, or labels.
You human beings have just done this, mostly unconsciously, because you consider "yourselves" above all other animals, creatures, and things. When obviously you are not

You human beings, in the days when this is being written, have absolutely no idea, yet, of what is about to soon happen and occur

See, you people have been brought up to only look at 'others' and not look at 'yourselves' as doing wrong nor being bad​.

Most important: I do not have any negative judgments of human beings in general or in specific.

In case, after reading the above, you think I do, you assumed and should have asked what I meant by words that, hilariously, you think are negative.
Post Reply