accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2024 12:54 am

You won't get an answer because it was just a meaningless word salad in the first place. He's been saying the same thing over and over for years. It doesn't mean anything.
Obviously, absolutely no one 'knows', exactly, what "accelafine" is talking about and referring to here, beside it of course.
No one, besides "accelafine", knows, exactly:
1. Who the 'you' word refers to.
2. What the first 'it' word refers to.
3 Who the "he" word refers to.
4. What the 'same thing' words refers to.
5. What the second 'it' word refers to.
What 'this one' has done here, but does not, yet, seem to even recognize and know, was a very common thing among the adult human being population, in the days when this was being written, that is; they assumed that others would know what they talking and/or writing, even when they are only just alluding to some thing or another.
They would, actually, presume or believe that others would, or should, 'know' what they were thinking or talking about. Even when they have not even remotely made things clear.
Now, for irrefutable proof that 'this' has occurred here, absolutely any one can try to name what those five things are, exactly. Obviously, "accelafine" would have to be the judge if one is right, or not.