Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:18 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:49 pm Ah okay.

Are you at all aware that what you said and wrote here can come across as a fact that you claim to know about?

And, were you aware that you do this quite often, actually? As can be seen here, in this forum, by the amount of differing, claimed to be true, diagnoses, which you have made 'about me', here.
It can come across to you like that, certainly. And are you aware that I may be doing this on purpose?
Yes, but what purpose would you have for doing 'this'?

And, if you actually have a purpose for doing this, then what is your purpose for doing this?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:25 pm
Atla wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:18 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:49 pm Ah okay.

Are you at all aware that what you said and wrote here can come across as a fact that you claim to know about?

And, were you aware that you do this quite often, actually? As can be seen here, in this forum, by the amount of differing, claimed to be true, diagnoses, which you have made 'about me', here.
It can come across to you like that, certainly. And are you aware that I may be doing this on purpose?
and further, we may have to keep reminding Age that your intended target audience is not necessarily Age.
But why do you have to, supposedly, keep reminding 'me' of this?

I never not knew this, or in other words nor ever forgot this.

Why did you presume and believe what you did here "iwannaplato"?
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Iwannaplato »

Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:04 pm Why would 'you' give 'me' a capital 'a'?
I didn't give it to you. I accepted it as the name you chose here. Every single post of yours says it is 'by Age' with a capital 'A'. This means you chose to have your name with a capital A when you created the account. henry quirk chose not to do that.
Last edited by Iwannaplato on Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Iwannaplato »

Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:55 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:25 pm
Atla wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:18 pm
It can come across to you like that, certainly. And are you aware that I may be doing this on purpose?
and further, we may have to keep reminding Age that your intended target audience is not necessarily Age.
But why do you have to, supposedly, keep reminding 'me' of this?
I never said that.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:50 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:25 pm Are you sure that 'this answer' is for all of you people here, in the days when this is being written here?
Or, is it for some, only?
I was responding to Flannel Jesus. The answer was for him.
So, are you saying that your answer was for "him" only?

Also, and by the way, you have, once again, successfully completely and utterly misunderstood me here, once more, and/or completely and utterly missed what I was talking about, referencing, and meaning.

But, this is a very, very common habit of yours, so is not that unexpected anyway.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Iwannaplato »

Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:04 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:50 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:25 pm Are you sure that 'this answer' is for all of you people here, in the days when this is being written here?
Or, is it for some, only?
I was responding to Flannel Jesus. The answer was for him.
So, are you saying that your answer was for "him" only?

Also, and by the way, you have, once again, successfully completely and utterly misunderstood me here, once more, and/or completely and utterly missed what I was talking about, referencing, and meaning.

But, this is a very, very common habit of yours, so is not that unexpected anyway.
Are you absolutely sure I successfully completely and utterly misunderstood you here, once more, and/or completely and utterly missed what you were talking about, referencing, and meaning?
Atla
Posts: 9936
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:52 pm
Atla wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:18 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:49 pm Ah okay.

Are you at all aware that what you said and wrote here can come across as a fact that you claim to know about?

And, were you aware that you do this quite often, actually? As can be seen here, in this forum, by the amount of differing, claimed to be true, diagnoses, which you have made 'about me', here.
It can come across to you like that, certainly. And are you aware that I may be doing this on purpose?
Yes, but what purpose would you have for doing 'this'?

And, if you actually have a purpose for doing this, then what is your purpose for doing this?
Already told you many times (even though it should be obvious even without it), not gonna repeat it again.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:57 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:04 pm Why would 'you' give 'me' a capital 'a'?
I didn't give it to you. I accepted it as the name you chose here.
But, obviously each time you write and use it 'you' are 'giving' it.

And, that you continuously choose to 'accept' it you are 'giving' it.

Obviously, I have chosen to not use it, but if you want to keep doing so, then okay.

Also, why do you to choose to accept it as the name you presume I chose some time, but not at other times? Why do you accept a 'one time', only?

Are you not open, or do you not feel comfortable, with change, and evolution?

It is okay if you are like this, it was quite common among some of you adult human beings, in the days when this was being written.

Or, is there some other reason?
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:57 pm Every single post of yours says it is 'by Age' with a capital 'A'. This means you chose to have your name with a capital A when you created the account.
LOL How closed you really are "iwannaplato".

So, once again, this one here shows, and proves, just how closed it really is, and that before any clarification at all is ever sought out by it, that it will conclude what the 'only answer' could be, and, worse still, 'must be' and is.
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:57 pm henry quirk chose not to do that.
If this is what you believe is true, then this must be true, to you, right?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:58 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:55 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:25 pm and further, we may have to keep reminding Age that your intended target audience is not necessarily Age.
But why do you have to, supposedly, keep reminding 'me' of this?
I never said that.
My mistake, and my misreading. So, I apologize profusely, to you "iwannaplato".
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:10 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:04 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:50 pm I was responding to Flannel Jesus. The answer was for him.
So, are you saying that your answer was for "him" only?

Also, and by the way, you have, once again, successfully completely and utterly misunderstood me here, once more, and/or completely and utterly missed what I was talking about, referencing, and meaning.

But, this is a very, very common habit of yours, so is not that unexpected anyway.
Are you absolutely sure I successfully completely and utterly misunderstood you here, once more, and/or completely and utterly missed what you were talking about, referencing, and meaning?
Yes.

Are you able to show and/or demonstrate otherwise?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:18 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:52 pm
Atla wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:18 pm
It can come across to you like that, certainly. And are you aware that I may be doing this on purpose?
Yes, but what purpose would you have for doing 'this'?

And, if you actually have a purpose for doing this, then what is your purpose for doing this?
Already told you many times (even though it should be obvious even without it), not gonna repeat it again.
LOL "atla" Now here is the typical response from those, back then, who were just like "atla".
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Iwannaplato »

Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:19 pm But, obviously each time you write and use it 'you' are 'giving' it.
Nope. I accept what you have given yourself.
And, that you continuously choose to 'accept' it you are 'giving' it.
Gibberish.
Obviously, I have chosen to not use it, but if you want to keep doing so, then okay.
No, when you registered you chose Age. This could probably be changed even now. And, as I said, every post you write has the heading by Age.
Also, why do you to choose to accept it as the name you presume I chose some time, but not at other times? Why do you accept a 'one time', only?
Every post of yours has the heading 'by Age'. This is repeated again and again.
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:57 pm Every single post of yours says it is 'by Age' with a capital 'A'. This means you chose to have your name with a capital A when you created the account.
LOL How closed you really are "iwannaplato".
This one is being very vague.

So, once again, this one, Age, here shows, and proves, just how closed Age really is, and that before any clarification at all is ever sought out by it, that it will conclude what the 'only answer' could be, and, worse still, 'must be' and is.

Further, I never said what the 'only answer' could be.
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:57 pm henry quirk chose not to do that.
If this is what you believe is true, then this must be true, to you, right?
Yes, I believe henry quick chose to use small case letters for the two parts of his name here.

It's fine with me if you don't want to take responsibility for giving yourself a name, here, with a capital first letter. It's fine with me if you continue to post under this name.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Iwannaplato »

Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:22 pm Yes.

Are you able to show and/or demonstrate otherwise?
Are you able to show that I successfully completely and utterly misunderstood you there, once more, and/or completely and utterly missed what you were talking about, referencing, and meaning?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:30 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:19 pm But, obviously each time you write and use it 'you' are 'giving' it.
Nope. I accept what you have given yourself.
But, obviously I am giving it a small 'a'. you, obviously rebelling, are giving it a capital 'a'.

But, if course, you are absolutely free to keep doing so if this is how 'you' 'look at' and 'see' 'me'.

Also, it is very considerate of 'you' to keep wanting to accept what 'you' believe I have given,
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:30 pm
And, that you continuously choose to 'accept' it you are 'giving' it.
Gibberish.
Obviously, I have chosen to not use it, but if you want to keep doing so, then okay.
No, when you registered you chose Age.
Once again, you are letting your own pre-existing beliefs get in the way of what actual Truth could be, or is.

One day you will recognize and 'see' that you do this, and even you will 'see' how often you used to do this. After all they are all written down here for all to 'look at' and 'see', as well.
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:30 pm This could probably be changed even now.
Do you know how to. I have tried to.

Also, it is not some thing I would bother an "administrator" nor "moderator" over. Especially considering what is being exposed and revealed here, now, from not previously bothering them.
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:30 pm And, as I said, every post you write has the heading by Age.
Yes, you did already say this.

And, I have also already said that you let your pre-existing beliefs get in the way of what the Truth could be, but I will not repeat it again here, now
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:30 pm
Also, why do you to choose to accept it as the name you presume I chose some time, but not at other times? Why do you accept a 'one time', only?
Every post of yours has the heading 'by Age'. This is repeated again and again.
Yes, very True. But, what is also True is that it is not by 'me'.

you said that you 'accept' what I 'give', but your behaviour or actions here show and reveal otherwise.
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:30 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:57 pm Every single post of yours says it is 'by Age' with a capital 'A'. This means you chose to have your name with a capital A when you created the account.
LOL How closed you really are "iwannaplato".
This one is being very vague.

So, once again, this one, Age, here shows, and proves, just how closed Age really is, and that before any clarification at all is ever sought out by it, that it will conclude what the 'only answer' could be, and, worse still, 'must be' and is.

Further, I never said what the 'only answer' could be.
Are you absolutely sure of this?
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 10:30 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:57 pm henry quirk chose not to do that.
If this is what you believe is true, then this must be true, to you, right?
Yes, I believe henry quick chose to use small case letters for the two parts of his name here.
Okay, so to "iwannaplato" 'this' 'must be' 'the answer'. Which, obviously, also means 'the only one', or another one but which just means the, exact, same thing, anyway.
quote=Iwannaplato post_id=716591 time=1719005448 user_id=3619]
It's fine with me if you don't want to take responsibility for giving yourself a name, here, with a capital first letter. It's fine with me if you continue to post under this name.
[/quote]

LOL Imagine the amount of further negative 'feedback', 'criticism', 'presumptions, and/or 'ridicule' 'i' would receive from 'you' if I did change that name to another name, going on and by you previously posts and, imagined, claims from changing names here, previously
Last edited by Age on Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

Post by Iwannaplato »

Age wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 11:21 pm But, obviously I am giving it a small 'a'. you, obviously rebelling, are giving it a capital 'a'.
No, a few times, it seems, you refer to yourself as 'age'. However every post, because of a choice you made and choose not to undo - such as you undid your choice to no longer use 'Ken' - has 'Age' with a capital A twice. For example, the post I am responding to now has Age above the post, to the left
by Age » Fri Jun 21, 2024 11:21 pm
and to the right of the post.

and then up to the right of the post

Age
Posts: 20863
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am
Contact: Contact Age


Oh, look a third time, though that one was only visible when I copied the speech bubble along with the rest.

But now that I know how much this matters to you, I will try to remember to refer to you as 'age', with a lower case 'a'. I may forget at times, given how long Age has been on all your posts. Well, since your posts had Ken, also with a capital letter.

It's fine with me if you want to continue avoiding taking responsibility here for choosing to participate in this forum primarily with the label Age and the way this will encourage others to refer to you.

Now you know why I accepted the name you chose and which you keep choosing to have on all your posts despite your preference for a different name: 'age'.

This one. 'age' has a hard time accepting even the slightest responsibility for some of its easily demonstrable acts. This one likes to try to put this responsibility on others.

Oh, look, it's also 'Age' in the thread display for those threads that 'age' starts.

This one asked a very stupid question when he 'age' asked why I referred to him as 'Age'

But at least this issue is resolved.
Post Reply