My brain does not compute.

[Skepdick]

Skeppy..I am not going to pander to you requirements.

The premise & the conditions are simple:



PREMISE: If a child were to say that they will never tell lies again and then lie, would they have told a lie?

CONDITIONS:

1 . IF

I don't care if you pander to my requirements. You keep leaving out the ELSE. That's invalid reasoning.

It's begging the question fallacy.

[attofishpi]

Skeppy..I am not going to pander to you requirements.

The premise & the conditions are simple:



PREMISE: If a child were to say that they will never tell lies again and then lie, would they have told a lie?

CONDITIONS:

1 . IF

I don't care if you pander to my requirements. You keep leaving out the ELSE. That's invalid reasoning.

It's begging the question fallacy.

The ELSE is the result of 2.

What is so difficult for you to comprehend that?

[Skepdick]

The ELSE is the result of 2.

No, it's not.

What is so difficult for you to comprehend that?

It's difficult to comprehend false things.

Code: Select all

IF child knew all along:
    lie_count = 1
    IF child tells a lie AGAIN
        lie_count= 2
ELSE
   lie_count = 0
   IF child tells a lie (NOT AGAIN)
       lie_count = ???

Different contexts...

[attofishpi]

I'm going to be so polite right now to point out how little I care about the previous post (of crap) so in other words FOC (fuck off c.un.t)

The wanka(s) of this thread all know if they have any semblance of intelligence that:



1 . If the child knew full well that he/she was going to lie in the future whilst stating "I will never tell lies again"

= 1 lie.

2. The child then lies, AGAIN.

= 2 lies.

Thus, definitely 1 lie---- possibly 2 lies...is the answer.

It can only be answered for 2 lies IF the child knew at the time of making the statement, right there and then that it was lying.


The fact that Skepdick and others want to make something so simple into something they insist is a paradox is BLOODY RIDICULOUS - Skepdick can manipulate the information all he wants, but it does not detract from a simple factual conclusion from the premise - that either there are two lies or one.

PERIOD --> .