Unsure why the British people marched?

[Gary Childress]

It's called "tough love".

Looks a lot like hate to me.

You are seeking to be exempt from the laws of nature. That cannot be achieved.

What are the "laws of nature"?

[promethean75]

"Quran 51:56. I did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me."

Well u tell allah tough shit becuz we ain't worshippin em. The jinn have waited many years for the one who will free them from the gods

What kind of an arrogant asshole capitalizes the 'm' like that when he writes 'me', anyway?

[Gary Childress]

"Quran 51:56. I did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me."

Well u tell allah tough shit becuz we ain't worshippin em. The jinn have waited many years for the one who will free them from the gods

What kind of an arrogant asshole capitalizes the 'm' like that when he writes 'me', anyway?

Thank you, Prom. You always have the appropriate (and humorous) follow up posts. A gentleman and scholar are you!

[promethean75]

Well it's like this. Very intelligent people suffer differently than normal people becuz they are aware of more problems in the world, philosophical and theoretical. This awareness creates a deeper kind of cognitive and emotional dissonance in a person and the depression they suffer is much more rich and existentially satisfying in a french poet masochist nihilist sort of way... or in the case of the religious here (IC, Nick A, henry, mebbe AJ) that become nervous kierkegaardean wrecks who finally exhaust themselves tryna maintain the facade of being confident (in) and having proof that a god exists while knowing in their hearts they don't believe it reelly but will continue to act and live as religious believers becuz there's nuthin to lose to do so (continue believing, i mean).

Now what i mean to say is that i don't like to see this kind of suffering and anxiety in all the intellectuals here so what i do is tryda diffuse the immense inner turmoil and the conflicts between them in the forums as a result, by being an obnoxious asshole who forces them to either laugh heartily or be appalled by what they see. But what they aren't doing in that moment that i have them, gary, as brief as it may be, is wallowing in their own intellectual misery.

They need me, gary. These people are already one foot in the grave and I'll be goddamned if I'll stand passively by while intellectuals and philosophers all over the forum suffer the knowledge they have becuz some fuckin universe hadta make bipedal hominids get real smart and become aware of the shitty situation they're in. Fuck that. I'm gonna tryda make em laugh. They deserve it.

[Gary Childress]

Well it's like this. Very intelligent people suffer differently than normal people becuz they are aware of more problems in the world, philosophical and theoretical. This awareness creates a deeper kind of cognitive and emotional dissonance in a person and the depression they suffer is much more rich and existentially satisfying in a french poet masochist nihilist sort of way... or in the case of the religious here (IC, Nick A, henry, mebbe AJ) that become nervous kierkegaardean wrecks who finally exhaust themselves tryna maintain the facade of being confident (in) and having proof that a god exists while knowing in their hearts they don't believe it reelly but will continue to act and live as religious believers becuz there's nuthin to lose to do so (continue believing, i mean).

Now what i mean to say is that i don't like to see this kind of suffering and anxiety in all the intellectuals here so what i do is tryda diffuse the immense inner turmoil and the conflicts between them in the forums as a result, by being an obnoxious asshole who forces them to either laugh heartily or be appalled by what they see. But what they aren't doing in that moment that i have them, gary, as brief as it may be, is wallowing in their own intellectual misery.

They need me, gary. These people are already one foot in the grave and I'll be goddamned if I'll stand passively by while intellectuals and philosophers all over the forum suffer the knowledge they have becuz some fuckin universe hadta make bipedal hominids get real smart and become aware of the shitty situation they're in. Fuck that. I'm gonna tryda make em laugh. They deserve it.

Sounds fair to me.

[Age]

"Quran 51:56. I did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me."

Well u tell allah tough shit becuz we ain't worshippin em. The jinn have waited many years for the one who will free them from the gods

What kind of an arrogant asshole capitalizes the 'm' like that when he writes 'me', anyway?

Do you, personally, and/or you human beings, capitalize the first letters of your name?

If yes, then why?

And, could doing so be construed as you being a king of so-called 'arrogant asshole' as well?

Or, does this label not apply to when you human beings do it?

If yes, then why

[Gary Childress]

"Quran 51:56. I did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me."

Well u tell allah tough shit becuz we ain't worshippin em. The jinn have waited many years for the one who will free them from the gods

What kind of an arrogant asshole capitalizes the 'm' like that when he writes 'me', anyway?

Do you, personally, and/or you human beings, capitalize the first letters of your name?

If yes, then why?

And, could doing so be construed as you being a king of so-called 'arrogant asshole' as well?

Or, does this label not apply to when you human beings do it?

If yes, then why

I guess if a person wrote the words: "I did not create my kids except to worship Me". Then I might either take them as being humorous or else being an unbelievable jerk. So I would say, "yes" if they were serious, and "no" if it was meant to be humorous. Maybe Allah has a sense of humor?

[godelian]

Looks a lot like hate to me.

You are seeking to be exempt from the laws of nature. That cannot be achieved.

What are the "laws of nature"?

The natural law that demands that living beings have short-term and long-term (reproductive) survival instinct. The consequence for not having it, is that you won't survive short-term or long-term. Civilization to some extent disables this law. However, this law will inevitably seek to reassert itself with a vengeance.

[accelafine]

You are seeking to be exempt from the laws of nature. That cannot be achieved.

What are the "laws of nature"?

The natural law that demands that living beings have short-term and long-term (reproductive) survival instinct. The consequence for not having it, is that you won't survive short-term or long-term. Civilization to some extent disables this law. However, this law will inevitably seek to reassert itself with a vengeance.

Breed like flies in your own countries then. No one's stopping you.

[godelian]

Breed like flies in your own countries then. No one's stopping you!

Britain is and has always been the country of its Muslim citizens of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Indian origin, ever since 1613, when the East India Company established British sovereignty over the Indian subcontinent.

In the Indian Independence Act of 1947, Lord Mountbatten did indeed grant independence to the Muslims in the British Ray, but this does not apply the other way around. The Muslims of the British Ray have never and will never grant independence to Britain.

This principle was explicitly clarified to Lord Mountbatten, who agreed and attached his stamp of approval on behalf of the Royal House and parliament of Britain.

There is simply no way that His Majesty's government will be allowed to unilaterally renege on its obligations or to surreptitiously evade the consequences of her historical arrangements. On the contrary, His Majesty's government will be requested to fully comply.

[accelafine]

Breed like flies in your own countries then. No one's stopping you!

Britain is and has always been the country of its Muslim citizens of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Indian origin, ever since 1613, when the East India Company established British sovereignty over the Indian subcontinent.

In the Indian Independence Act of 1947, Lord Mountbatten did indeed grant independence to the Muslims in the British Ray, but this does not apply the other way around. The Muslims of the British Ray have never and will never grant independence to Britain.

This principle was explicitly clarified to Lord Mountbatten, who agreed and attached his stamp of approval on behalf of the Royal House and parliament of Britain.

There is simply no way that His Majesty's government will be allowed to unilaterally renege on its obligations or to surreptitiously evade the consequences of her historical arrangements. On the contrary, His Majesty's government will be requested to fully comply.

Before welfare WTF does any of that even mean? What does 'Lord Mountbatten' have to do with the price of fish? He was a c**t who deserved all he got. Who said I'm talking about 'Britain anyway? Fuck the British. If they want to be over-run with islam then good luck to them.

[Systematic]

Tommy Robinson is a fascist. Classic.

Edit: He said in the video that he wasn't a fascist, so...

I don't know how anyone could actually be fascist without calling themselves fascists. They got me there.

[godelian]

Breed like flies in your own countries then. No one's stopping you!

Britain is and has always been the country of its Muslim citizens of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Indian origin, ever since 1613, when the East India Company established British sovereignty over the Indian subcontinent.

In the Indian Independence Act of 1947, Lord Mountbatten did indeed grant independence to the Muslims in the British Ray, but this does not apply the other way around. The Muslims of the British Ray have never and will never grant independence to Britain.

This principle was explicitly clarified to Lord Mountbatten, who agreed and attached his stamp of approval on behalf of the Royal House and parliament of Britain.

There is simply no way that His Majesty's government will be allowed to unilaterally renege on its obligations or to surreptitiously evade the consequences of her historical arrangements. On the contrary, His Majesty's government will be requested to fully comply.

Before welfare WTF does any of that even mean? What does 'Lord Mountbatten' have to do with the price of fish? He was a c**t who deserved all he got. Who said I'm talking about 'Britain anyway? Fuck the British. If they want to be over-run with islam then good luck to them.

Read the title of the post. It asks why British people marched.

If they marched against the presence of Muslims of the Indian subcontinent, then I simply have to point out that they have been citizens of Britain ever since the East India Company proclaimed British sovereignty over the Indian subcontinent in 1613.

British people have no right to march against the presence of anybody who has been subjects of His Majesty the King for centuries. They cannot march against Scotsmen, Welshmen or Irishmen either.

The English crown insisted on unifying and expanding its realm overseas with colonies, dominions, and territories.

The British crown may some day grant independence to Scotland. The Scotsmen, however, are under no obligation whatsoever to reciprocate or to grant independence to Britain. On the contrary, they can very well hold His Majesty's government accountable to all existing arrangements and demand their unperturbed continuation.

[accelafine]

Britain is and has always been the country of its Muslim citizens of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Indian origin, ever since 1613, when the East India Company established British sovereignty over the Indian subcontinent.

In the Indian Independence Act of 1947, Lord Mountbatten did indeed grant independence to the Muslims in the British Ray, but this does not apply the other way around. The Muslims of the British Ray have never and will never grant independence to Britain.

This principle was explicitly clarified to Lord Mountbatten, who agreed and attached his stamp of approval on behalf of the Royal House and parliament of Britain.

There is simply no way that His Majesty's government will be allowed to unilaterally renege on its obligations or to surreptitiously evade the consequences of her historical arrangements. On the contrary, His Majesty's government will be requested to fully comply.

Before welfare WTF does any of that even mean? What does 'Lord Mountbatten' have to do with the price of fish? He was a c**t who deserved all he got. Who said I'm talking about 'Britain anyway? Fuck the British. If they want to be over-run with islam then good luck to them.

Read the title of the post. It asks why British people marched.

If they marched against the presence of Muslims of the Indian subcontinent, then I simply have to point out that they have been citizens of Britain ever since the East India Company proclaimed British sovereignty over the Indian subcontinent in 1613.

British people have no right to march against the presence of anybody who has been subjects of His Majesty the King for centuries. They cannot march against Scotsmen, Welshmen or Irishmen either.

The English crown insisted on unifying and expanding its realm overseas with colonies, dominions, and territories.

The British crown may some day grant independence to Scotland. The Scotsmen, however, are under no obligation whatsoever to reciprocate or the grant independence to Britain. On the contrary, they can very well hold His Majesty's government accountable to all existing arrangements and demand their unperturbed continuation.

What bullshit. Do you think anyone from the Commonwealth countries has an automatic right to live in GB? Each Govt. brings in its own immigration policies. Most Indians are Hindu anyway. Every Indian I've ever known hates muslims.

[godelian]

What bullshit. Do you think anyone from the Commonwealth countries has an automatic right to live in GB? Each Govt. brings in its own immigration policies. Most Indians are Hindu anyway. Every Indian I've ever known hates muslims.

Immigration is a different matter altogether.

Citizens of the former British Ray do not necessarily have the right of abode in Britain. There are necessarily other conditions to be satisfied. However, when they do, their British citizenship is not counted merely henceforth but recognized all the way from 1613.

There are also specific rules for specific former British dependencies such as Hong Kong, for which there is also no automatic right of abode, but who are granted a substantially simplified procedure.

I have never claimed that the entire population of the commonwealth has the right of abode in Britain. This is not even possible for reasons of population control. However, the citizenship of the ones who do have the right of abode cannot be understood as subjects of the crown ex tunc but must be deemed such ab initio.