Creation - Evolution

[Age]

They cannot dominant over 'my words', as they cannot counter nor refute them.

How cute, this one actually believes that its words weren't easily refuted again and again.

Here 'we' have another one who is completely and utterly BLIND and DEAF here.

This one also, still, believes without absolutely any doubt at all that I believe things here.

These people are living, irrefutable, proof of just how CLOSED one becomes when they 'look at' and 'hear' things from their pre-existing beliefs and assumptions.

Now, not a one of you here has actually refuted what I have said and claimed here. Although, and obviously, this is contrary to what they believe here.

Everyone else knows that you're simply a delusional, agressive idiot.

LOL 'now' 'aggressive'.

I just express some of my views, and it is 'me' who is, supposedly, 'aggressive' 'now'.

Not just here but in real life too. And this will never change.

LOL
LOL
LOL

Are you 'now' scared of 'me' in 'real life', as well as 'in here', "atla"?

[Atla]

They cannot dominant over 'my words', as they cannot counter nor refute them.

How cute, this one actually believes that its words weren't easily refuted again and again.

Here 'we' have another one who is completely and utterly BLIND and DEAF here.

This one also, still, believes without absolutely any doubt at all that I believe things here.

These people are living, irrefutable, proof of just how CLOSED one becomes when they 'look at' and 'hear' things from their pre-existing beliefs and assumptions.

Now, not a one of you here has actually refuted what I have said and claimed here. Although, and obviously, this is contrary to what they believe here.

Everyone else knows that you're simply a delusional, agressive idiot.

LOL 'now' 'aggressive'.

I just express some of my views, and it is 'me' who is, supposedly, 'aggressive' 'now'.

Not just here but in real life too. And this will never change.

LOL
LOL
LOL

Are you 'now' scared of 'me' in 'real life', as well as 'in here', "atla"?

For example I've refuted many of your weird metaphysical claims by challenging you to prove them, and you completely failed to do so.

Other claims of yours, like those having to do with physics, were refuted by multiple people.

And just about anyone can refute claims of yours like having no beliefs. No one cares about your misuse of words.

This whole delusion system you've created is a form of agression, you think people don't know that? The psychiatrists that evaluate you know this perfectly.

[Age]

I ask this one, another, clarifying question, but because it could not do so without contradicting and refuting "itself", it, once again, tries to put 'its own inability' back onto 'me', and then tries to make out that it is 'me' who has the disability and incapacity here.

Which is a Truly funny thing to watch and observe here. One just has to 'look back' over our conversations here to very clearly 'see' how Truly incapable this one has been to just answer and clarify clarifying questions posed, and asked to it, by me.

Except people here know that I can back up what I say and you can't. Especially if they go through the torture of looking back on the "conversations". You are once again lying to others and lying to yourself. People here see this too.

Not that you would ever clarify, but do you believe that this is absolutely true "atla"?

So, if you writing, Cause and effect is implicit in everything, and everyone knows this, not just in evolution, does not mean what you say here, then what does this mean. exactly?

Let 'us' see if you have the ability to clarify here.

It means what it says. If you don't know what it means, especially after I explicitly mentioned it several times already in this thread, then that can only mean that you have no idea about anything physics-related. Should have studied.

See how this one never just answers and clarifies. Again, and it cannot because if it did, it would then show how much it contradicts, lies, and refutes "its" own 'self' here.

"atla" claims that 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, not just in evolution', and then claims that I think "atla" said that evolution happens without cause and effect, which puts 'me' into the category of people who even have trouble counting their fingers.

Yet, when "atla" is asked to clarify what saying, 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, but just not in evolution, itself, means, if it does not mean that "atla" thinks or believes that evolution happens without cause and effect, or that cause and effect are not in 'evolution', itself, "atla" instead of clarifying, once more, goes off on some lie, deflection, and tangent about "explicitly mentioning 'it' several times already', and then into another attempt at ridicule, discrediting, and/or singling out of 'me'.

"atla" gets so lost and confused in its attempts to argue against me that it ends up saying the most ridiculous of things like, 'cause and effect is in everything, except for evolution, itself.


As can be clearly seen and proved True above here.

You are incapable of proving your mind, mind-matter duality, evolution, time travel and infinite human potential beliefs, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

[Atla]

I ask this one, another, clarifying question, but because it could not do so without contradicting and refuting "itself", it, once again, tries to put 'its own inability' back onto 'me', and then tries to make out that it is 'me' who has the disability and incapacity here.

Which is a Truly funny thing to watch and observe here. One just has to 'look back' over our conversations here to very clearly 'see' how Truly incapable this one has been to just answer and clarify clarifying questions posed, and asked to it, by me.

Except people here know that I can back up what I say and you can't. Especially if they go through the torture of looking back on the "conversations". You are once again lying to others and lying to yourself. People here see this too.

Not that you would ever clarify, but do you believe that this is absolutely true "atla"?

So, if you writing, Cause and effect is implicit in everything, and everyone knows this, not just in evolution, does not mean what you say here, then what does this mean. exactly?

Let 'us' see if you have the ability to clarify here.

It means what it says. If you don't know what it means, especially after I explicitly mentioned it several times already in this thread, then that can only mean that you have no idea about anything physics-related. Should have studied.

See how this one never just answers and clarifies. Again, and it cannot because if it did, it would then show how much it contradicts, lies, and refutes "its" own 'self' here.

"atla" claims that 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, not just in evolution', and then claims that I think "atla" said that evolution happens without cause and effect, which puts 'me' into the category of people who even have trouble counting their fingers.

Yet, when "atla" is asked to clarify what saying, 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, but just not in evolution, itself, means, if it does not mean that "atla" thinks or believes that evolution happens without cause and effect, or that cause and effect are not in 'evolution', itself, "atla" instead of clarifying, once more, goes off on some lie, deflection, and tangent about "explicitly mentioning 'it' several times already', and then into another attempt at ridicule, discrediting, and/or singling out of 'me'.

"atla" gets so lost and confused in its attempts to argue against me that it ends up saying the most ridiculous of things like, 'cause and effect is in everything, except for evolution, itself.


As can be clearly seen and proved True above here.

You are incapable of proving your mind, mind-matter duality, evolution, time travel and infinite human potential beliefs, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

I told you to learn to read. "not just in" and "but just not in" have opposite meanings.

[Age]

On the contrary, it's pretty central. Because you have no idea what they are actually teaching in school.

They 'taught' in school that the earth revolves around the sun. And, if you were living in 'those days', then you would have been fighting and arguing the exact same way you are here now.

"atla" arguments rely on, 'I was 'taught' in school, and in elementary school, that there are 'many minds', so, if anyone says or claims otherwise, then they did not even go to elementary school. And, 'this argument' goes for just about all of its claims here.

How old are you, 500? Did you go to school in the Middle Ages?
That was disproven.

That, and that it was 'taught', was 'the point' you imbecile.

Many minds is also proven currently.

LOL Just like 'the sun revolves around the earth' was 'being 'currently' so-called proven', once upon a time.

Once upon a time also it was 'taught' in schools, and in elementary schools, that 'the Universe began, and is expanding'. And, to some this was also 'currently', so-called, 'being proved true'. Back in those 'olden days' when this was being written, and that False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect 'story' was being told to others and children.

In fact there is a poster here who wrote 'a story' about how the Universe began, and is expanding, and 'that one' is also, trying to, 'teach' 'this story' to unsuspecting younger ones.

Are you yet aware that 'this story' was also proved UNTRUE?

We are still eagerly awaiting your shocking refutation of it.

Have you backed up and supported your claim that there are 'many minds' and also that the 'many mind story' is being proven, 'currently', in the days when this is being written?

If no, then what are you waiting for, exactly?

[Atla]

They 'taught' in school that the earth revolves around the sun. And, if you were living in 'those days', then you would have been fighting and arguing the exact same way you are here now.

"atla" arguments rely on, 'I was 'taught' in school, and in elementary school, that there are 'many minds', so, if anyone says or claims otherwise, then they did not even go to elementary school. And, 'this argument' goes for just about all of its claims here.

How old are you, 500? Did you go to school in the Middle Ages?
That was disproven.

That, and that it was 'taught', was 'the point' you imbecile.

Many minds is also proven currently.

LOL Just like 'the sun revolves around the earth' was 'being 'currently' so-called proven', once upon a time.

Once upon a time also it was 'taught' in schools, and in elementary schools, that 'the Universe began, and is expanding'. And, to some this was also 'currently', so-called, 'being proved true'. Back in those 'olden days' when this was being written, and that False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect 'story' was being told to others and children.

In fact there is a poster here who wrote 'a story' about how the Universe began, and is expanding, and 'that one' is also, trying to, 'teach' 'this story' to unsuspecting younger ones.

Are you yet aware that 'this story' was also proved UNTRUE?

We are still eagerly awaiting your shocking refutation of it.

Have you backed up and supported your claim that there are 'many minds' and also that the 'many mind story' is being proven, 'currently', in the days when this is being written?

If no, then what are you waiting for, exactly?

It was never proven that the universe began. Our current best interpretation is that it is expanding, at least from our perspective, but this can never be fully proven either.

Many minds is proven however. Do you understand that, you fucking retard? Of course I've supported it. Everything supports it.

[Age]

How cute, this one actually believes that its words weren't easily refuted again and again.

Here 'we' have another one who is completely and utterly BLIND and DEAF here.

This one also, still, believes without absolutely any doubt at all that I believe things here.

These people are living, irrefutable, proof of just how CLOSED one becomes when they 'look at' and 'hear' things from their pre-existing beliefs and assumptions.

Now, not a one of you here has actually refuted what I have said and claimed here. Although, and obviously, this is contrary to what they believe here.

Everyone else knows that you're simply a delusional, agressive idiot.

LOL 'now' 'aggressive'.

I just express some of my views, and it is 'me' who is, supposedly, 'aggressive' 'now'.

Not just here but in real life too. And this will never change.

LOL
LOL
LOL

Are you 'now' scared of 'me' in 'real life', as well as 'in here', "atla"?

For example I've refuted many of your weird metaphysical claims by challenging you to prove them, and you completely failed to do so.

So, to "atla", if one just does not prove to "atla" a claim is true, which "atla" is 'currently' believing is not true, then, well to "atla" anyway, then this means that "atla" has 'refuted' 'the claim'.

This makes one wonder, 'How does "atla" define the 'refuted' word, exactly?

I hope 'this one' does not wonder why I USE it as a prime example of and for how 'confirmation bias' works, exactly.

Also, I do not have any so-called 'metaphysical' claims at all.

But, then again, this one could obviously be using a very, very different definition than I do, once more.

Other claims of yours, like those having to do with physics, were refuted by multiple people.

Really?

If yes, there is no use asking, but if I were to ask you, by who, and how, exactly, then you would never answer and clarify, right?

And just about anyone can refute claims of yours like having no beliefs. No one cares about your misuse of words.

So, "atla" believes that this is absolutely and irrefutably true, right, and correct here.

Which explains, exactly, why it has been saying and claiming the things that it has here.

This whole delusion system you've created is a form of agression, you think people don't know that? The psychiatrists that evaluate you know this perfectly.

This one believes that is so incredibly amazing, powerful, and all-seeing and all-knowing 'about others', that it believes that it knows, exactly, what happens and occurs 'with others' outside of this forum.

This one is so incredibly knowledgeable that from just printed words in front of the eyes of 'that body' 'that one' KNOWS how another one lives and what they do, exactly. Even when absolutely nothing is implied, let alone said, in 'those words'.

[Atla]

Here 'we' have another one who is completely and utterly BLIND and DEAF here.

This one also, still, believes without absolutely any doubt at all that I believe things here.

These people are living, irrefutable, proof of just how CLOSED one becomes when they 'look at' and 'hear' things from their pre-existing beliefs and assumptions.

Now, not a one of you here has actually refuted what I have said and claimed here. Although, and obviously, this is contrary to what they believe here.



LOL 'now' 'aggressive'.

I just express some of my views, and it is 'me' who is, supposedly, 'aggressive' 'now'.


LOL
LOL
LOL

Are you 'now' scared of 'me' in 'real life', as well as 'in here', "atla"?

For example I've refuted many of your weird metaphysical claims by challenging you to prove them, and you completely failed to do so.

So, to "atla", if one just does not prove to "atla" a claim is true, which "atla" is 'currently' believing is not true, then, well to "atla" anyway, then this means that "atla" has 'refuted' 'the claim'.

This makes one wonder, 'How does "atla" define the 'refuted' word, exactly?

I hope 'this one' does not wonder why I USE it as a prime example of and for how 'confirmation bias' works, exactly.

Also, I do not have any so-called 'metaphysical' claims at all.

But, then again, this one could obviously be using a very, very different definition than I do, once more.

Other claims of yours, like those having to do with physics, were refuted by multiple people.

Really?

If yes, there is no use asking, but if I were to ask you, by who, and how, exactly, then you would never answer and clarify, right?

And just about anyone can refute claims of yours like having no beliefs. No one cares about your misuse of words.

So, "atla" believes that this is absolutely and irrefutably true, right, and correct here.

Which explains, exactly, why it has been saying and claiming the things that it has here.

This whole delusion system you've created is a form of agression, you think people don't know that? The psychiatrists that evaluate you know this perfectly.

This one believes that is so incredibly amazing, powerful, and all-seeing and all-knowing 'about others', that it believes that it knows, exactly, what happens and occurs 'with others' outside of this forum.

This one is so incredibly knowledgeable that from just printed words in front of the eyes of 'that body' 'that one' KNOWS how another one lives and what they do, exactly. Even when absolutely nothing is implied, let alone said, in 'those words'.

Self-obsessed retards like you all think that people can never see through them, when actually you are almost the same and all too predictable.

[Age]

Except people here know that I can back up what I say and you can't. Especially if they go through the torture of looking back on the "conversations". You are once again lying to others and lying to yourself. People here see this too.

Not that you would ever clarify, but do you believe that this is absolutely true "atla"?

It means what it says. If you don't know what it means, especially after I explicitly mentioned it several times already in this thread, then that can only mean that you have no idea about anything physics-related. Should have studied.

See how this one never just answers and clarifies. Again, and it cannot because if it did, it would then show how much it contradicts, lies, and refutes "its" own 'self' here.

"atla" claims that 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, not just in evolution', and then claims that I think "atla" said that evolution happens without cause and effect, which puts 'me' into the category of people who even have trouble counting their fingers.

Yet, when "atla" is asked to clarify what saying, 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, but just not in evolution, itself, means, if it does not mean that "atla" thinks or believes that evolution happens without cause and effect, or that cause and effect are not in 'evolution', itself, "atla" instead of clarifying, once more, goes off on some lie, deflection, and tangent about "explicitly mentioning 'it' several times already', and then into another attempt at ridicule, discrediting, and/or singling out of 'me'.

"atla" gets so lost and confused in its attempts to argue against me that it ends up saying the most ridiculous of things like, 'cause and effect is in everything, except for evolution, itself.


As can be clearly seen and proved True above here.

You are incapable of proving your mind, mind-matter duality, evolution, time travel and infinite human potential beliefs, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

I told you to learn to read. "not just in" and "but just not in" have opposite meanings.

Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

you said and wrote, Cause and effect is implicit in everything, and everyone knows this, not just in evolution,

So, to "atla" it actually believes that this is true. But, as "atla" would say and claim, 'everyone else knows otherwise'.

Also, what you wrote and claimed here is not necessarily so, at all.

[Atla]

Not that you would ever clarify, but do you believe that this is absolutely true "atla"?


See how this one never just answers and clarifies. Again, and it cannot because if it did, it would then show how much it contradicts, lies, and refutes "its" own 'self' here.

"atla" claims that 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, not just in evolution', and then claims that I think "atla" said that evolution happens without cause and effect, which puts 'me' into the category of people who even have trouble counting their fingers.

Yet, when "atla" is asked to clarify what saying, 'Cause and effect is implicit in everything, but just not in evolution, itself, means, if it does not mean that "atla" thinks or believes that evolution happens without cause and effect, or that cause and effect are not in 'evolution', itself, "atla" instead of clarifying, once more, goes off on some lie, deflection, and tangent about "explicitly mentioning 'it' several times already', and then into another attempt at ridicule, discrediting, and/or singling out of 'me'.

"atla" gets so lost and confused in its attempts to argue against me that it ends up saying the most ridiculous of things like, 'cause and effect is in everything, except for evolution, itself.


As can be clearly seen and proved True above here.


Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

I told you to learn to read. "not just in" and "but just not in" have opposite meanings.

Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

you said and wrote, Cause and effect is implicit in everything, and everyone knows this, not just in evolution,

So, to "atla" it actually believes that this is true. But, as "atla" would say and claim, 'everyone else knows otherwise'.

Also, what you wrote and claimed here is not necessarily so, at all.

And watch how this dishonest retard immediately changes the subject after it was shown that it simply couldn't read. And that they way it misinterpreted what was said, has shown that it has no clue about the topic.

Also, I said the opposite of "everyone else knows otherwise".

And again, who are these imaginary friends of yours you call 'we'? You are alone.

[Age]

How old are you, 500? Did you go to school in the Middle Ages?
That was disproven.

That, and that it was 'taught', was 'the point' you imbecile.

Many minds is also proven currently.

LOL Just like 'the sun revolves around the earth' was 'being 'currently' so-called proven', once upon a time.

Once upon a time also it was 'taught' in schools, and in elementary schools, that 'the Universe began, and is expanding'. And, to some this was also 'currently', so-called, 'being proved true'. Back in those 'olden days' when this was being written, and that False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect 'story' was being told to others and children.

In fact there is a poster here who wrote 'a story' about how the Universe began, and is expanding, and 'that one' is also, trying to, 'teach' 'this story' to unsuspecting younger ones.

Are you yet aware that 'this story' was also proved UNTRUE?

We are still eagerly awaiting your shocking refutation of it.

Have you backed up and supported your claim that there are 'many minds' and also that the 'many mind story' is being proven, 'currently', in the days when this is being written?

If no, then what are you waiting for, exactly?

It was never proven that the universe began.

See how because "atla" believes that the Universe is eternal, then it decides that the Universe was never proven to have begun.

But, if you ask any so-called "good scientist" or "good theologian" they both say that it is already proven that the Universe began. one just says in one way while another just says in another way.

Our current best interpretation is that it is expanding,

And, it was also your 'current' best interpretation that the sun revolves around the earth, as well.

But, just like other 'current' 'best interpretations', of yours, they do not actually hold up at all, let alone well at all.

at least from our perspective, but this can never be fully proven either.

But this can be and has already been proven irrefutably True.

One just needs to discover, or learn, and understand, how to 'look at' and 'see' things for how they really are.

And, once this is done, then finding and seeing the irrefutable Truth of things is a very simple and very easy thing to do.

One also thinks about how stupid 'we' really were, back then, to not have come to see and recognize 'this way', earlier.

Many minds is proven however.

Okay. And, said exactly with as much conviction and like how those who also said and claimed what they did. But, which, unfortunately for them, was proved to be absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

Do you understand that, you fucking retard?

Just maybe 'I' understand 'that' far more than 'you' will ever realize in that tiny minuscule of 'time' 'you', actually, have left here.

Of course I've supported it. Everything supports it.

So, "atla" has proven, 'without a shadow of doubt'. as some might say, that there are 'many minds'. And, "atla" is so convinced of its claim here, "atla" even claims that absolutely every thing in the whole Universe, also, supports its belief that there are 'many minds' existing.

Yet, what "atla" has failed to recognize and see here is that it has never supported its very own made up belief here, nor that absolutely everything supports its very own belief as well.

In fact, "atla" could not even inform 'the readers' here of what 'the mind' is, exactly.

What "atla" is trying to argue and fight for here is like those who believe and claim that God absolutely exists, yet when they are asked what is 'God', exactly, they are not able to explain this.

"atla" believes there absolutely exists 'many minds', but will fail to inform anyone of what one mind even is, exactly.

[Age]

For example I've refuted many of your weird metaphysical claims by challenging you to prove them, and you completely failed to do so.

So, to "atla", if one just does not prove to "atla" a claim is true, which "atla" is 'currently' believing is not true, then, well to "atla" anyway, then this means that "atla" has 'refuted' 'the claim'.

This makes one wonder, 'How does "atla" define the 'refuted' word, exactly?

I hope 'this one' does not wonder why I USE it as a prime example of and for how 'confirmation bias' works, exactly.

Also, I do not have any so-called 'metaphysical' claims at all.

But, then again, this one could obviously be using a very, very different definition than I do, once more.

Other claims of yours, like those having to do with physics, were refuted by multiple people.

Really?

If yes, there is no use asking, but if I were to ask you, by who, and how, exactly, then you would never answer and clarify, right?

And just about anyone can refute claims of yours like having no beliefs. No one cares about your misuse of words.

So, "atla" believes that this is absolutely and irrefutably true, right, and correct here.

Which explains, exactly, why it has been saying and claiming the things that it has here.

This whole delusion system you've created is a form of agression, you think people don't know that? The psychiatrists that evaluate you know this perfectly.

This one believes that is so incredibly amazing, powerful, and all-seeing and all-knowing 'about others', that it believes that it knows, exactly, what happens and occurs 'with others' outside of this forum.

This one is so incredibly knowledgeable that from just printed words in front of the eyes of 'that body' 'that one' KNOWS how another one lives and what they do, exactly. Even when absolutely nothing is implied, let alone said, in 'those words'.

Self-obsessed retards like you all think that people can never see through them, when actually you are almost the same and all too predictable.

And, you 'non-selfish highest of intelligent people' can see not just straight through everyone else but also through 'the words' on a screen and know, without doubt who 'those others' interact with and what they also do, right "atla"?

[Age]

I told you to learn to read. "not just in" and "but just not in" have opposite meanings.

Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

you said and wrote, Cause and effect is implicit in everything, and everyone knows this, not just in evolution,

So, to "atla" it actually believes that this is true. But, as "atla" would say and claim, 'everyone else knows otherwise'.

Also, what you wrote and claimed here is not necessarily so, at all.

And watch how this dishonest retard immediately changes the subject after it was shown that it simply couldn't read. And that they way it misinterpreted what was said, has shown that it has no clue about the topic.

Also, I said the opposite of "everyone else knows otherwise".

And again, who are these imaginary friends of yours you call 'we'? You are alone.

Okay, 'I' am alone, here.

you claim that 'cause and effect is in everything, except evolution'.

Now, if this is wrong or incorrect, then correct it.

If you do not correct it, then this is, exactly, what you meant.

Show 'us' what you are capable of here now "atla".

[Atla]

See how because "atla" believes that the Universe is eternal, then it decides that the Universe was never proven to have begun.

But, if you ask any so-called "good scientist" or "good theologian" they both say that it is already proven that the Universe began. one just says in one way while another just says in another way.

Age is exposing itself even more now. Age has NO IDEA what proofs and science are and that no "good scientist" will say that it is proven that the universe began.

Our current best interpretation is that it is expanding,
And, it was also your 'current' best interpretation that the sun revolves around the earth, as well.

But, just like other 'current' 'best interpretations', of yours, they do not actually hold up at all, let alone well at all.
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 4:59 pm
at least from our perspective, but this can never be fully proven either.
But this can be and has already been proven irrefutably True.

One just needs to discover, or learn, and understand, how to 'look at' and 'see' things for how they really are.

And, once this is done, then finding and seeing the irrefutable Truth of things is a very simple and very easy thing to do.

One also thinks about how stupid 'we' really were, back then, to not have come to see and recognize 'this way', earlier.

Age is admitting that it has absolutely no fucking clue about proofs and science. And no, your self-serving hallucinations aren't accepted as proof.

Okay. And, said exactly with as much conviction and like how those who also said and claimed what they did. But, which, unfortunately for them, was proved to be absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 4:59 pm
Do you understand that, you fucking retard?
Just maybe 'I' understand 'that' far more than 'you' will ever realize in that tiny minuscule of 'time' 'you', actually, have left here.
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 4:59 pm
Of course I've supported it. Everything supports it.
So, "atla" has proven, 'without a shadow of doubt'. as some might say, that there are 'many minds'. And, "atla" is so convinced of its claim here, "atla" even claims that absolutely every thing in the whole Universe, also, supports its belief that there are 'many minds' existing.

Yet, what "atla" has failed to recognize and see here is that it has never supported its very own made up belief here, nor that absolutely everything supports its very own belief as well.

In fact, "atla" could not even inform 'the readers' here of what 'the mind' is, exactly.

What "atla" is trying to argue and fight for here is like those who believe and claim that God absolutely exists, yet when they are asked what is 'God', exactly, they are not able to explain this.

"atla" believes there absolutely exists 'many minds', but will fail to inform anyone of what one mind even is, exactly.

I explained the "mind" to you for pages in another topic a few months ago, how utterly pathetic and miserable that all Age can do is resort to lies such as the above, again and again, instead of trying to actually prove its mind claim. This is all these delusional fucks are ever able to do.

[Atla]

Yes 'we' know what you believe is true, but 'we' are not interested in just what you believe is true. 'We' want to 'see' what you can prove True, instead.

you said and wrote, Cause and effect is implicit in everything, and everyone knows this, not just in evolution,

So, to "atla" it actually believes that this is true. But, as "atla" would say and claim, 'everyone else knows otherwise'.

Also, what you wrote and claimed here is not necessarily so, at all.

And watch how this dishonest retard immediately changes the subject after it was shown that it simply couldn't read. And that they way it misinterpreted what was said, has shown that it has no clue about the topic.

Also, I said the opposite of "everyone else knows otherwise".

And again, who are these imaginary friends of yours you call 'we'? You are alone.

Okay, 'I' am alone, here.

you claim that 'cause and effect is in everything, except evolution'.

Now, if this is wrong or incorrect, then correct it.

If you do not correct it, then this is, exactly, what you meant.

Show 'us' what you are capable of here now "atla".

No, you are not the universal 'I' you retard. You are just a delusional little human with a ruined life.

I already corrected you. Nowhere have I said that "cause and effect is in everything, except evolution".