You mean like never masturbating?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:06 pmHow dense you are, Gary.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:49 pmResolve to do what?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:46 pm •metaphysical principles• that drive my assertions (which have the ultimate purpose of concretizing and strengthening my own resolve).
My resolve in relation to living in accord with those principles I work to define.
How can you, a not unintelligent man, not grasp such basic things?!? Is there a Key that I might use to understand you?
Sex and the Religious-Left
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Oh. In that case, no. I'm not masturbating right now.attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:12 pmNah, masturbating.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:09 pmYou mean "fiddling with the keys", right?attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:03 pm
Well, I can't seem to nod off - didn't even feel like spanking the monkey to assist.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
I can't multitask either.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:18 pmOh. In that case, no. I'm not masturbating right now.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Well, that's pretty much what wanting to return to the past is. There's a reason that the past is the past and not the present.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:14 pmAnd with that you go into the territory of the stoooopid.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:11 pm True. I don't understand segregation or burning witches. You've got me there.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:18 pmI can't multitask either.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:18 pmOh. In that case, no. I'm not masturbating right now.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Okay there's a lot to go over here... let's start with the basics: "Perversion" and "Diversion".
The root word is Vert, meaning direction (Ver-ticle, Ver-tice, Ver-tex).
Per-version = Corruption
Di-version = Redirection from the original destination
So masturbation is a corruption of the natural sexual impulse (perversion), which is to reproduce.
Masturbation diverts (diversion) the goal of sex, to beget a child, from Potency to Impotency.
Rather than the natural impulse to reproduce (Potency), the sex-drive is diverted to *NOT* reproduce (Impotency).
Nature has no compassion or mercy for the Losers of sex, the impotent and perverse. If you do not reproduce, then your genes die off. You become extinct. This can extend to entire families, tribes, societies, species (Genocide). There is no guarantee in life, ever.
But to conflate sex as "no big deal" and "equally valid", is the biggest of lies possible and imaginable. This is the critical difference between (sexual) Liberalism and Conservatism. Liberalism is premised on the idea of "Liberating" the Sex Drive from traditional morality (Conservatism). Thus, Liberals promote "Free Sex" (from the 1960s to now), as detached or disconnected entirely from Nature. Liberals thus argue masturbation, exhibition, homosexuality, transexuality, etc. are "no big deal" and "have sex however you want as long as it's not hurting/imposing upon others". But this ignores the fundamental difference between the Liberal and the Conservative.
Liberals ignore the Nature of sex (to reproduce).
Conservatives revere the Nature of sex (to procreate).
Conservatives see the natural consequence of Sex is to 'build a family'. Thus, the moral paradigm shifts between liberal to conservative. Your sex is not for pleasure, per se, but for 'building' relationships, family, kin, a new tribe, a new society, a new genealogy. In fact, this is what most of the "Holy Books" are specifically about, new genealogies. Hence, most religions are based on (conservative) Sexuality, and rail against and outlaw liberal Sexuality.
The root word is Vert, meaning direction (Ver-ticle, Ver-tice, Ver-tex).
Per-version = Corruption
Di-version = Redirection from the original destination
So masturbation is a corruption of the natural sexual impulse (perversion), which is to reproduce.
Masturbation diverts (diversion) the goal of sex, to beget a child, from Potency to Impotency.
Rather than the natural impulse to reproduce (Potency), the sex-drive is diverted to *NOT* reproduce (Impotency).
Exactly this.promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 3:38 pmHuman sexuality is ugly, ruthless and has no sympathy for the losers. That's why it has always been, and will always be, the engine of the greatest social conflict.
Nature has no compassion or mercy for the Losers of sex, the impotent and perverse. If you do not reproduce, then your genes die off. You become extinct. This can extend to entire families, tribes, societies, species (Genocide). There is no guarantee in life, ever.
But to conflate sex as "no big deal" and "equally valid", is the biggest of lies possible and imaginable. This is the critical difference between (sexual) Liberalism and Conservatism. Liberalism is premised on the idea of "Liberating" the Sex Drive from traditional morality (Conservatism). Thus, Liberals promote "Free Sex" (from the 1960s to now), as detached or disconnected entirely from Nature. Liberals thus argue masturbation, exhibition, homosexuality, transexuality, etc. are "no big deal" and "have sex however you want as long as it's not hurting/imposing upon others". But this ignores the fundamental difference between the Liberal and the Conservative.
Liberals ignore the Nature of sex (to reproduce).
Conservatives revere the Nature of sex (to procreate).
Conservatives see the natural consequence of Sex is to 'build a family'. Thus, the moral paradigm shifts between liberal to conservative. Your sex is not for pleasure, per se, but for 'building' relationships, family, kin, a new tribe, a new society, a new genealogy. In fact, this is what most of the "Holy Books" are specifically about, new genealogies. Hence, most religions are based on (conservative) Sexuality, and rail against and outlaw liberal Sexuality.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
"The root word is Vert, meaning direction (Ver-ticle, Ver-tice, Ver-tex). Per-version = Corruption
Di-version = Redirection from the original destination"
Oh dear. Wizzz sees Pezer and Saully over at ILP translating Latin so now he's a philologist.
"Masturbation diverts (diversion) the goal of sex, to beget a child, from Potency to Impotency."
What if u jack off and reproduce? Is that cool?
Di-version = Redirection from the original destination"
Oh dear. Wizzz sees Pezer and Saully over at ILP translating Latin so now he's a philologist.
"Masturbation diverts (diversion) the goal of sex, to beget a child, from Potency to Impotency."
What if u jack off and reproduce? Is that cool?
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
OK.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:00 pm Okay there's a lot to go over here... let's start with the basics: "Perversion" and "Diversion".
The root word is Vert, meaning direction (Ver-ticle, Ver-tice, Ver-tex).
Per-version = Corruption
Di-version = Redirection from the original destination
So masturbation is a corruption of the natural sexual impulse (perversion), which is to reproduce.
Masturbation diverts (diversion) the goal of sex, to beget a child, from Potency to Impotency.
Rather than the natural impulse to reproduce (Potency), the sex-drive is diverted to *NOT* reproduce (Impotency).
Exactly this.promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 3:38 pmHuman sexuality is ugly, ruthless and has no sympathy for the losers. That's why it has always been, and will always be, the engine of the greatest social conflict.
Nature has no compassion or mercy for the Losers of sex, the impotent and perverse. If you do not reproduce, then your genes die off. You become extinct. This can extend to entire families, tribes, societies, species (Genocide). There is no guarantee in life, ever.
But to conflate sex as "no big deal" and "equally valid", is the biggest of lies possible and imaginable. This is the critical difference between (sexual) Liberalism and Conservatism. Liberalism is premised on the idea of "Liberating" the Sex Drive from traditional morality (Conservatism). Thus, Liberals promote "Free Sex" (from the 1960s to now), as detached or disconnected entirely from Nature. Liberals thus argue masturbation, exhibition, homosexuality, transexuality, etc. are "no big deal" and "have sex however you want as long as it's not hurting/imposing upon others". But this ignores the fundamental difference between the Liberal and the Conservative.
Liberals ignore the Nature of sex (to reproduce).
Conservatives revere the Nature of sex (to procreate).
Conservatives see the natural consequence of Sex is to 'build a family'. Thus, the moral paradigm shifts between liberal to conservative. Your sex is not for pleasure, per se, but for 'building' relationships, family, kin, a new tribe, a new society, a new genealogy. In fact, this is what most of the "Holy Books" are specifically about, new genealogies. Hence, most religions are based on (conservative) Sexuality, and rail against and outlaw liberal Sexuality.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
So if I decide to jerk off, will I need to impregnate a female in order to make it OK? Does anyone here really want that to happen or would you prefer I jerk off and not produce offspring? Let's see a show of hands. First, think of yourself calling me "dad" and then vote.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
"Let's see a show of hands. First, think of yourself calling me "dad" and then vote."
You're relatively healthy, physically fit, and you're intelligent. I can think of millions of other people who I'd want to remain childless rather than u, Childress.
Childless Childress. That doesn't even sound right.
You're relatively healthy, physically fit, and you're intelligent. I can think of millions of other people who I'd want to remain childless rather than u, Childress.
Childless Childress. That doesn't even sound right.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
It depends, will you spank me?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:29 pm So if I decide to jerk off, will I need to impregnate a female in order to make it OK? Does anyone here really want that to happen or would you prefer I jerk off and not produce offspring? Let's see a show of hands. First, think of yourself calling me "dad" and then vote.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
If reproduction in sex is defined as Success, and not reproducing is defined as Failure,
Then liberals want men to Fail, and conservatives want men to Succeed.
Isn't that obvious???
Then liberals want men to Fail, and conservatives want men to Succeed.
Isn't that obvious???
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Why wouldn't conservatives, then, not want perverted people to have their genes fade away. Also those who fall for what you'd call propaganda.
And how many babies to you have to have. A man could masturbate a lot - when his wife is sick, pregnant, not in the mood, when he's on a business trip and still have ten babies or more.
And women, forgetabout it.
Further you're hand were sure as hell not made for typing. You could be out procreating.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Nah. I'd give you "what for" if you did something seriously wrong, though. The worst part, however, is that I have schizoid characteristics. I really wouldn't want to pass them on to a kid. Between that and being immature, introverted, clumsy, and shy with women, I'd like to think I did the right thing.attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:43 pmIt depends, will you spank me?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:29 pm So if I decide to jerk off, will I need to impregnate a female in order to make it OK? Does anyone here really want that to happen or would you prefer I jerk off and not produce offspring? Let's see a show of hands. First, think of yourself calling me "dad" and then vote.
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
Okay, your Liberal mind is missing the point...Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:53 pmWhy wouldn't conservatives, then, not want perverted people to have their genes fade away. Also those who fall for what you'd call propaganda.
And how many babies to you have to have. A man could masturbate a lot - when his wife is sick, pregnant, not in the mood, when he's on a business trip and still have ten babies or more.
And women, forgetabout it.
Further you're hand were sure as hell not made for typing. You could be out procreating.
Let's go further.
Liberalism is based off of 'Liberation' from goals, objectives, ideals, except hedonism and pleasure-seeking. So if your goal now, is family and reproduction, then liberals Divert that goal back to hedonism. This is why you diverted the point, the reproducing family, back to masturbation, as-if that negated what was done by the Conservative family.
The difference is that the Conservative has a family to protect, while the Liberal does not, at least, not without contradicting himself and being a hypocrite.