Sex and the Religious-Left

[Wizard22]

but the religion you seem to be advocating sounds absolutely abominable.

That's right, Hairball, how disgusting and evil it must be, to promote healthy loving families for the masses...

Shows who's truly 'backward' and forward around here, dun'nit?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Well, I don't know about all that I just don't like seeing cock in my porn when I have clicked on lesbian gang bang.

Did you watch the video - hilarious aint it??

You are very naive. Did you know that lesbians who don't want to have sex with 'lesbiantranswomen' (i.e. STRAIGHT MEN) are called 'transphobes'.
You going on twitter. You learn a lot on there

Naive my arse!! My best friend (a female) is bisexual. I know ACTUAL lesbians don't tend to like cock - doesn't mean I have to like cock when I watch them getting all sensual with each other!! Most feminine "lesbians" in my EXPERIENCE tend to be BISEXUAL - its the masculine ones (that I'd rather not see naked) that hate cock as much as I do

It was mentioned on the news recently that the Australian football teams (Matildas) goal keeper considers "ITSELF" as gender non-binary.

WTF does that mean - is IT a suitable pronoun?

I said lesbian, not bi sexual! And these MEN are calling themselves lesbians! Oh forget it. Don't know why I bother trying to converse with a fruitloop who thinks god fu*ks him.

[attofishpi]

You are very naive. Did you know that lesbians who don't want to have sex with 'lesbiantranswomen' (i.e. STRAIGHT MEN) are called 'transphobes'.
You going on twitter. You learn a lot on there

Naive my arse!! My best friend (a female) is bisexual. I know ACTUAL lesbians don't tend to like cock - doesn't mean I have to like cock when I watch them getting all sensual with each other!! Most feminine "lesbians" in my EXPERIENCE tend to be BISEXUAL - its the masculine ones (that I'd rather not see naked) that hate cock as much as I do

It was mentioned on the news recently that the Australian football teams (Matildas) goal keeper considers "ITSELF" as gender non-binary.

WTF does that mean - is IT a suitable pronoun?

I said lesbian, not bi sexual!

Duh, read what I said.

And these MEN are calling themselves lesbians! Oh forget it. Don't know why I bother trying to converse with a fruitloop who thinks god fu*ks him.

Knowing God exists makes me a fruitloop does it? Dunder head.

[Harbal]

but the religion you seem to be advocating sounds absolutely abominable.

That's right, Hairball, how disgusting and evil it must be, to promote healthy loving families for the masses...

Sexual repression, particularly in a marriage, is not healthy; quite the contrary, in fact. I have a strong feeling that you are talking about things you have no personal experience of when it comes to these matters.

[attofishpi]

He must freak out after waking up to a wet dream. Poor fella.

[Wizard22]

Sexual repression, particularly in a marriage, is not healthy; quite the contrary, in fact. I have a strong feeling that you are talking about things you have no personal experience of when it comes to these matters.

No! Nobody can have actually meaningful sex with their wives or husbands! Every other sex is morally better and superior!

You sound like a doofus—but that's always been the case with you.

The Religious-Right, are right, about the left.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

At least 90 percent of the people who post on here are completely insane. FACT.

[attofishpi]

At least 90 percent of the people who post on here are completely insane. FACT.

SAD_DAM WHOS_SANE!!

[Harbal]

Sexual repression, particularly in a marriage, is not healthy; quite the contrary, in fact. I have a strong feeling that you are talking about things you have no personal experience of when it comes to these matters.

No! Nobody can have actually meaningful sex with their wives or husbands!

What is "meaningful" sex, and why can't it occur between husband and wife?

Every other sex is morally better and superior!

I don't even know why anyone would see sex between consenting adults, and isn't damaging or hurting anyone else, as a moral issue. You are coming across as some sort of puritanical screw-up.

You sound like a doofus—but that's always been the case with you.

And you sound like someone who can't get any sex, and resents those who can. I'm not saying that is the case, just that I wouldn't be surprised if it were.

[Wizard22]

And you sound like someone who can't get any sex,

I got laid twice last week, retard, and with a woman prettier than you've touched in your entire life.

Any other idiocy from you before I take my few days off???

Please, please, Hairball, I want to see the 'depths' of your retardation!

[Iwannaplato]

but the religion you seem to be advocating sounds absolutely abominable.

That's right, Hairball, how disgusting and evil it must be, to promote healthy loving families for the masses...

Shows who's truly 'backward' and forward around here, dun'nit?

It's mythological that the religious right has had healthy loving families. I mean, I'm sure some of them had this, but they also had physical abuse, duty-bound loveless marriages, overcontrol and shaming over children, unnecessary physical punishment of children, anti-body, emotion, sex, expressiveness training of children, fear of creativity, conforming to the point of choking the life out of people, silly and dangerous sorts of 'patiotism' like supporting wars that were not in the least for their benefit, promoting the idea that women were necessarily idiots in fields they have proven not to be idiots in, unquestioning trust in certain authority figures, hatred of difference because it's different - which plays out in all sorts of ways, with boys trying to make sure they are not 'fags' and making themselves into cardboard figures living in fear, girls and women doing the same in their boxed in roles, instilling fear of God in children and so.

It's odd how 'patriotic' they can be when they have such a deep down hatred of freedom.

A deadening, breaking down the soul and heart of children and generally themselves as well.

[Iwannaplato]

And you sound like someone who can't get any sex,

I got laid twice last week, retard, and with a woman prettier than you've touched in your entire life.

Any other idiocy from you before I take my few days off???

Please, please, Hairball, I want to see the 'depths' of your retardation!

Was this extramarital sex?
The Religious Right aren't gonna like that unless you're running for office against a liberal.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

And you sound like someone who can't get any sex,

I got laid twice last week, retard, and with a woman prettier than you've touched in your entire life.

Any other idiocy from you before I take my few days off???

Please, please, Hairball, I want to see the 'depths' of your retardation!

But that's sinful. She might have got pregnant the first time in which case the second time would have been surplus to requirements.

[Harbal]

And you sound like someone who can't get any sex,

I got laid twice last week,

Well anyone can say that, can't they? But, foolishly assuming you are telling the truth, was it with the intention of producing two offspring?

and with a woman prettier than you've touched in your entire life.

That's an incredibly childish insult. You have absolutely no way of knowing who I have touched in my life, and how pretty they might have been. Everything you write here is the sort of stuff that could be expected from a poorly educated teenager who wants to hang out with, and be accepted by, the grown-ups. May I suggest that you hang out with grown-ups as stupid as you are?

Any other idiocy from you before I take my few days off???

A few days off from being an imbecile, you mean? Sure, take all the time you like.

Please, please, Hairball, I want to see the 'depths' of your retardation!

But I don't think it is mine that everyone else will be seeing.

[Atla]

How is the 'right' the bigger offender when the Religious-Left own the lion's share of Mass Media used to propagate them all though?

Isn't that blaming the victim a little bit, Atla?

Because the "right" has a somewhat lower average intelligence and is therefore easier manipulated, deceived.

The Religious-Right have a 'guidebook' to compensate for low intelligence, The Bible, which are instructions in morality for those without common sense, or who need to be forced into 'good' action under threat of force/violence.

The Religious-Left are not much better, though, Atla. And because they do not have a Morality or Framework to draw from, they then herald their sexual perversions as examples and 'proof' of their "moral superiority". Thus they invert morality, turning it upside-down: aka Satanism.

Isn't this satanic inverted anti-morality merely a reaction, a mockery though, in addition to being a trick of the Jews in power? In the 21st century and onward, the belief in God and objective morality is no longer tenable, so it's mocked, some people do the opposite of it. But of course that doesn't make this anti-morality good. On the 'left' people know just as well that a morality such as of the Bible, is roughly the right morality, and this deviant anti-morality of the "religious left" is abnormal.

But where the 'guidebook' completely fails to compensate for low intelligence (and arguably it's impossible to compensate), is again, in teaching the low-IQ right to be able to spot and prevent the machinations of the Jews and others in power, who operate say 30-40 IQ above them, use abstract structures and are hidden behind abstract structures, and often follow another religion or no religion.

(Also, if the world doesn't unite under one monotheistic religion, or unite without any monotheistic religion, then imo the two or more monotheistic religions will probably end the world in nuclear war, which is imo the broader problem of religion.)