Sex and the Religious-Left

[Alexis Jacobi]

Does the scarecrow brain really deserve 'fairness' though? If his main tactics are lies and slander, insults and personal attacks, then why should he be met or expected of Honesty? You see, Alexis, this is where my criticism of your 'tactics' reemerges: I don't think you fully understand the Religious-Left and their 'language' of violence.

Myself, I have a self-defined objective: solely to be able to see and describe what is happening (in us, in our society, in our country, in the world) fairly & accurately. For this project it does not matter how anyone else acts. I have my own angle to pursue.

In fact I think I definitely have a good sense of how destructive and dangerous, and untrustworthy, are Marxist-inspired activists. My entire area of concern is the effects of their undermining of established orders. My position is that of recognizing, and reversing, that •grammar of self-intolerance• that Bowden describes as having infected our decisiveness.

So what I need to do more than anything else is to be able to discern what is the ideology that operates in all of us (always in degrees) but notably in Flash and Sculptor who seem more *infected*.

Also: the bickering )as I characterize it) does no good to the forum.

But these are my strategies. Others have their’s and if it is working for them I suppose they should keep on.

[Alexis Jacobi]

The people who own the media are nominally god knows what, but they aren't left, unless Blackrock and Vanguard and a few other behemoth companies are closet lefties, they are owned by people who like power and money and that's their political persuasion.

And the right needs to own up to how they were used: they fell for Reagan and Bush one and other conservatives selling the idea that enormous corporations freedom was the same freedom as the working class, and they took away restrictions on these companies, gutted government oversight and promoted a lot of BS about how this helped working class people. They brought us NAFTA. The neocons enhanced corporate power power for decades and contributed to the formation of vast media conglomerates that are owned by companies we don't hear about. And of course concentrations of power in other sectors. Liberals have contributed to this, but not like the neocon-managed conservatives did. And they got you calling them leftist, when actually its doesn't care at all about politics except how it affects their power/money companies choosing how to distract people and get them to fight each other. There are people who used to be on the right but now tend not to think in those terms who get this. But generally speaking conservatives keep their focus very tight when assigning blame and cannot seem to manage to admit their own part in the current situation, nor how this lack of overview is helpful to the people with real power.

I agree with all this, by the way, and it is the exact reason why the Globalist/Marxist Elitists pivoted on a dime, and changed strategies overnight, when it came to the 'Occupy Wallstreet' movement. Again, I'll restate, "Tim Poole", Joe Rogan, even Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter, and the "Alt-Left", can all be sourced from the Occupy movement in 2008.

And these are Leftists who wanted to remain 'moderate' and 'centrist'. Now, they appear "Right" to the Far-Left, culturally.

The Obama Administration approved Black Op, Psy-ops, to be run against the American public, shortly thereafter (Color Revolutions).

The George Floyd Protests, BLM, Antifa, street-killings of Conservatives and the Political-Right, were the direct consequences.

As Iwan correctly states, the Conservative-Right is much slower to adapt. But the 'Controllers' are not Left nor Right, per se...

Similarly I also agree substantially with Iwannaplato in his analysis.

But generally speaking conservatives keep their focus very tight when assigning blame and cannot seem to manage to admit their own part in the current situation, nor how this lack of overview is helpful to the people with real power.

Here is a journalistic-opinion piece (Tucker Carlson taking aim at •vulture capitalism•) that crosses so many conventional lines. Everything is topsy-turvy.

[Iwannaplato]

Here is a journalistic-opinion piece (Tucker Carlson taking aim at •vulture capitalism•) that crosses so many conventional lines. Everything is topsy-turvy.

I know there are exceptions on both Left and Right. I've watched Tucker Carlsson and other people mentioned by both you and Wizard. And I agree it is topsy turvey at the margins. The margins are getting bigger.

Also, they have to keep throwing wilder and wilder candidates at us, so we'll keep believing the Shining White/Black savior fighting evil and keep waiting four more years to get that White/Black Knight into office to save us.

I live abroad and while horrified they often say 'These are the two best Candidates in a nation of over 300 million people???

[Alexis Jacobi]

I live abroad and while horrified they often say 'These are the two best Candidates in a nation of over 300 million people???

My not very politically correct opinion: in the Postwar they altered, substantially, the demography of the country. By doing do, and in combination with numerous factors, they had to alter to character of the nation. Socially, culturally, politically, it leads to confusion, chaos and strife.

Confusion, acrimony, strife and chaos reigns and I think (but am not certain) will reign — and demography is destiny.

The owners of the nation — the business class in concert with America’s political police (FBI etc.) will do all in their power to try to ‘unite disparities’. Sort of the same process that occurred in the 60’s — defeating pointed opposition through all manner of tactics.

It is bound to get really weird over the next 8 months — surprises await us all — and I have little optimism that things will return to *normal*.

[attofishpi]

The wannabe dictator and the dictator of Russia having a snog..(he's called T_RUMP and PUT_IN for a reason )

[Wizard22]

How is the 'right' the bigger offender when the Religious-Left own the lion's share of Mass Media used to propagate them all though?

Isn't that blaming the victim a little bit, Atla?

Because the "right" has a somewhat lower average intelligence and is therefore easier manipulated, deceived.

The Religious-Right have a 'guidebook' to compensate for low intelligence, The Bible, which are instructions in morality for those without common sense, or who need to be forced into 'good' action under threat of force/violence.

The Religious-Left are not much better, though, Atla. And because they do not have a Morality or Framework to draw from, they then herald their sexual perversions as examples and 'proof' of their "moral superiority". Thus they invert morality, turning it upside-down: aka Satanism.

[attofishpi]

The Religious-Right have a 'guidebook' to compensate for low intelligence, The Bible, which are instructions in morality for those without common sense, or who need to be forced into 'good' action under threat of force/violence.

The Religious-Left are not much better, though, Atla. And because they do not have a Morality or Framework to draw from, they then herald their sexual perversions as examples and 'proof' of their "moral superiority". Thus they invert morality, turning it upside-down: aka Satanism.

Could you provide a list of what you consider "sexual perversions"?

..also, could you cite references within the Bible that provide this "morality" to counter such sexual perversions?

[Wizard22]

Could you provide a list of what you consider "sexual perversions"?

Impotency: Any sex act that does not specifically intend to beget a child.

Masturbation is a sex act of impotency and perversion. Your sex drive is 'diverted' toward failure, not success.

..also, could you cite references within the Bible that provide this "morality" to counter such sexual perversions?

Not specifically, but Marriage under the House of God, is what 'purifies' the sex act, and raises Man above Animal.

[Wizard22]

Consider the Religious-Left, who see "nothing special" about Marriage, nothing spiritual nor significant about it.

Because they renounce their spirituality, a return to 'animal' nature. To the Religious-Left, Marriage is not about children and reproduction.

This is also why the Religious-Left is Anti-Biology and Anti-Nature.

[attofishpi]

Could you provide a list of what you consider "sexual perversions"?

Impotency: Any sex act that does not specifically intend to beget a child.

Masturbation is a sex act of impotency and perversion. Your sex drive is 'diverted' toward failure, not success.

OMG. So the only time you make love to a woman or a man is to create a child? ...and as far as you are concerned to make love to a loving partner without causing pregnancy is sexually perverted?

..also, could you cite references within the Bible that provide this "morality" to counter such sexual perversions?

Not specifically, but Marriage under the House of God, is what 'purifies' the sex act, and raises Man above Animal.

According to you, not to God. So you can't find anything in the bible that supports what you believe to be a sexual perversion - where two consenting loving adults make love to each other for reasons other that to create a child!!?

[Wizard22]

OMG. So the only time you make love to a woman or a man is to create a child? ...and as far as you are concerned to make love to a loving partner without causing pregnancy is sexually perverted?

What's the Purpose of a man and woman, if not to reproduce?

According to you, not to God. So you can't find anything in the bible that supports what you believe to be a sexual perversion - where two consenting loving adults make love to each other for reasons other that to create a child!!?

What do you think the purpose of Church and Marriage even is???

Why do you think The Bible or any "Holy Book" is written in the first place?

[attofishpi]

OMG. So the only time you make love to a woman or a man is to create a child? ...and as far as you are concerned to make love to a loving partner without causing pregnancy is sexually perverted?

What's the Purpose of a man and woman, if not to reproduce?

Doesn't matter what purpose we have, and I'm sure there is more than one, it doesn't make it a "sexual perversion" for a loving couple to have sex without having to create extra little twats to pollute the planet.

According to you, not to God. So you can't find anything in the bible that supports what you believe to be a sexual perversion - where two consenting loving adults make love to each other for reasons other that to create a child!!?

What do you think the purpose of Church and Marriage even is???

Why do you think The Bible or any "Holy Book" is written in the first place?

Again, provide evidence from the Bible which makes broad claims about everything be a sexual perversion unless babies are being made. You've got nothing, seems you're just another twisted weirdo putting their own delusions about God ONTO God. I wonder how God feels about that? <-- surely there is no greater sin than attributing bullshit to God!!!

[Wizard22]

without having to create extra little twats to pollute the planet.

And there's your Religious-Leftism, mon frere, the Religious-Left see biological children, specifically white children, as a disease.

That's why the Religious-Left is opposite of the Religious-Right.

Again, provide evidence from the Bible which makes broad claims about everything be a sexual perversion unless babies are being made. You've got nothing, seems you're just another twisted weirdo putting their own delusions about God ONTO God. I wonder how God feels about that? --- surely there is no greater sin than attributing bullshit to God!!

The Entire Bible is Evidence of Him, and our Holy Communion.

What do you think Communion is, except, between Man and Woman?

Without Sex, for Reproduction, there is no Community, no Communion, no Family, no Life.

The Religious-Right is Pro-Life. The Religious-Left is Anti-Life.

[Wizard22]

The Religious-Left sees nothing 'Sacred' about Life, nothing worth Preserving.

Hence, you are Liberals, not Conservatives. What does a Conservative "conserve", except his or her Own Life???

[attofishpi]

without having to create extra little twats to pollute the planet.

And there's your Religious-Leftism, mon frere, the Religious-Left see biological children, specifically white children, as a disease.

That's why the Religious-Left is opposite of the Religious-Right.

Left/Right - I couldn't give a shite. Anyone that thinks a baby needs to be made every time a woman is fucked is irresponsible to the balance of nature upon the planet. HEY - would you like to live in an overpopulated poluted shit hole?

Again, provide evidence from the Bible which makes broad claims about everything be a sexual perversion unless babies are being made. You've got nothing, seems you're just another twisted weirdo putting their own delusions about God ONTO God. I wonder how God feels about that? --- surely there is no greater sin than attributing bullshit to God!!

The Entire Bible is Evidence of Him, and our Holy Communion.

No it's not!! - and none of it supports your ridiculous claim!