Lol
https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ... 2#p2924260
My reasoning behind it..promethean75 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 7:35 pm Hey magsj imma help u guys out over there at ihatephilosophy with this pedophilia phobia u all have. But unlike Protagoras I'm not gonna charge u for it. I only charge my students when commissioned to solve complex problems. This one's is pretty easy.
Pedophilia will never be normalized and here's why. The practice of it would never be practically possible/feasible even if it were legalized becuz:
No parent would give their prepubescent child permission to have sexual relations with an adult even if it were legal. It just ain't gonna happen becuz humans associate sex with domination and exploitation, and parents certainly don't want this to happen to their youngins. Moreover, the risk of a pregnancy happening is all the more reason to avoid letting it happen. And even in the event that a prepubescent child is not under the supervision of a parent or guardian and finds an opportunity to have said relations with an adult, they'll be terrified of doing so, anyway.
To further ensure their prepubescent child isn't having sex, parents would routinely have their child examined by a doctor. If the child is found not to be a virgin, the parents would punish them... and kids don't want to be punished.
This is how it would work in the real world, not the philosophically theoretical world of fantasy and fear mongering fiction. I promise u. The fact is, legal or not, it will never be an open practice, and if the number of diaper snipers increases if and when it becomes legal, that increase would be negligible... not substantial enough to make any difference.
At most the age of consent might be dropped a few years, but prepubescent kids havin sex with adults? Nuh-uh. Never gonna happen.
Think about it.
'Hey mom, Mr. Barker next door wants to have sex with me. Can i... please, please, please?'
'Oh that sounds like fun, Mindy! Go ahead, sweetheart. And try doggystyle if u get a chance. Hurry back tho becuz dinner will be ready soon.'
'Honey, where's Mindy? She didn't clean up her room like i asked.'
'She's next door bangin Mr. Barker right now.'
'Oh okay. Well I'm off to the golf course. Tell her to clean that room when she gets back, will ya?'
My reasoning behind it.. https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ... 1#p2924931 ..nothing to do with a phobia.promethean75 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 7:35 pm Hey magsj imma help u guys out over there at ihatephilosophy with this pedophilia phobia u all have.
Not clever enough.. coz you have no idea what I think about the situation, as your thinking here is quite off, with what you think I think about the matter.promethean75 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:21 pm I'll tell u why i torment Ecmandu like i do, magsj. U think I'm being cruel but in fact I'm being incredibly clever.
promethean75 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:24 pm "Am I Jesus? In a way. Actually I’m the reincarnation of Prometheus" - Ecmandu
MagsJ tell that clown to stop stealin my dude! I'm promethean, not him.
I spoke too soon.. https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ... 1#p2924931MagsJ wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2024 6:47 pmpromethean75 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:24 pm "Am I Jesus? In a way. Actually I’m the reincarnation of Prometheus" - Ecmandu
MagsJ tell that clown to stop stealin my dude! I'm promethean, not him.![]()
Right now, man’s currently stealing every idea and word spoken by everyone, all over the boards.. coz he needs to replace the tripe he usually speaks, with rational thoughts ideas and ideals.. coz he sure ain’t got no sane ones of his own.![]()
"[A]nimating the storm into an enemy attacker helps the boatswain resist it, for in resisting the storm he does more than save his life. He defends right. He attacks the attacker and shows the storm he merits better than a drowning. In animating the storm, the boatswain arms himself with an artifice the exact opposite of Prospero's, which his would negate. The boatswain's artifice presents nature as having a will; Prospero's artifice presents his will as nature—he uses nature to obscure his will. In a sense, the boatswain in attributing a will to the storm blows Prospero's cover. Prospero wants to hide behind nature, because if his will is seen, those he would reform would resist him as vehemently as the boatswain now resists the storm. Reformation requires indirection. It is why reform is so hard to come by". (Kenneth M. DeLuca, "On the Problem of The Tempest: The Problem of Political Philosophy".)promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:15 pmWhat needs to be done - and this is one of the most difficult tasks in psychotherapy - is, somebody has to lead ecmandu out of his delusional neurosis but make it appear to ecmandu as if he's done it himself. He can't be forced becuz that grants control to his therapist, and that's precisely what we don't want a person with a raging inferiority complex to feel; not in control.
The trick is to talk him out of his bullshit while making him think he's the one who came up with the reasons why he's now rethinking the whole thing. Coerce is the word, but in an undetectable way. If he feels manipulated even the tiniest bit, his defensive measures will go back up and he'll demand again that we thank him for not sending us all to hell. Then we gotta start all over.