promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:48 pm
Oh and useless old haute bourgeois carol got enough money to keep her whole family from having to work for at least three generations.
Trump had multiple opportunities to not lose 90 million dollars to Carroll. He could for instance have chosen not to rape her, that would save him some cash.
But he's a billionaire, so the legal system would usually be weighted in his favour, so he could have saved some money on this case by paying good lawyers and following their advice. He would have got away with the rape entirely if he'd done that, at the cost of a few hundred grand in fees for a decent lawyer.
It's kind of gross to blame the rape victim for the rapist losing money.
Wizard22 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:41 pm
If I were in Trump's shoes with his legal troubles, I'd call up Flash Dpants' relatives with the longest, crookedest, schlong nose.
Patricia McCarthy wrote:Exactly what would the ideologically biased prosecutors in each of the absurd lawfare trials of President Trump be looking for?
That is an easy question. They would be looking for Trump-haters, people who watch MSNBC and The View, for example; people easily led and relatively ignorant of American history and current events beyond leftist talking points. They would know nothing about the fact that Trump led the U.S. to energy independence that made our gas prices low, and brought in huge profits to workers' 401(k)s because we had enough oil and gas to sell to other nations. They would not know that Trump brought peace to the Middle East. They would most likely buy into the climate change hoax. They would be persons who leaped to be vaccinated with the wholly experimental mRNA jab that has caused thousands of deaths (perhaps more), especially of young people. They would be people who wanted to jail the vaccine-hesitant. In short, they would be people who are easily manipulated by the media and, easier still, by clever and deceitful lawyers intent on destroying Trump. They would be sheep.
Jury consultants are sneaky. They will hire people to follow jurors to see if they have bumper stickers on their cars. They research each of the prospective jurors to determine their marital status, their kids, their jobs, what magazines they may subscribe to, and whether they have financial problems or a criminal record. They will discover their voting record. There is nothing they cannot learn about each potential juror. They are self-proclaimed experts in body language and will know who wants to be on a high-profile jury. It is a nasty business, but somehow it is legal. So again, there is no “jury of one’s peers” in the American justice system today. We can all be sure that the jurors selected to sit in judgment of Trump were carefully chosen for all the wrong reasons.
Each of the prosecutors in these lawsuits against Trump will have likely sought out the angriest, unhappiest, most ideologically rigid people. They may be educated but would be, like most academics are, on the far left and certain of their own superiority. They would not be critical thinkers; academics are no longer critical thinkers. Prosecutors would look for people who already believe the defendant is guilty or who they believe they can manipulate. They would excuse potential jurors who seem to actually think for themselves, people who might pick up on the bias of the judge or who have been revealed to be even remotely conservative.
The judges in each of the lawsuits against Trump are outrageously biased against him and have no problem denying his basic Constitutional rights. That would and should enrage jurors who are able to think for themselves but, so far, each jury has fallen hook, line, and sinker for the prosecutors’ and presiding judges’ patently obvious bias. Have these judges’ decisions been bought and paid for? Quite possible. The behavior of each of them, as well as the prosecutors, has been horrific. Each of them has denied justice in the most flagrant ways.
promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:38 pmAlso, Alina got a decent paycheck despite the loss and got to dress up and play lawyer...
... as convincingly as Clarence Darrow, although Darrow never faced such travesty of law (a travesty brilliantly pointed out by Trump's mesmerizing lawyer), at the time Darrow was practicing in the history of the world.
Losing a battle to corruption highlights the corruption.
Folks will vote for Trump just to see justice done ... because a lot of folks have been screwed by corruption of the system just as Trump is being screwed ... wouldn't you agree?
Wizard22 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:37 pm
Trump's just going to pardon himself from all charges and lawsuits when he starts his third-term Presidency....
USA! USA! USA! USA!
You must mean 2nd term, because more than that is prohibited by Amendment 22 of the United States Constitution. If you adhere to the law of the land, then you must admit that Trump is campaigning for his 2nd term. And by so doing, you must understand that the 2020 Presidential election was not stolen.
"a lot of folks have been screwed by corruption of the system just as Trump is being screwed ... wouldn't you agree?"
Not hardly. The majority of those who will vote for Trump, which are bible thumpin working class, would benefit more if they voted democrat. The minority, big business owners and the like, do better to vote for trump.
Even tho the majority still get fucked by the democrats (who are pro-capitalism), they don't get fucked as hard. It's the lesser of two evils.
Passion, intelligence, beauty, strength, fired-up ... for real entertaining.
Holy shit Walker, your endorsement really is the kiss of death.
You do realize that because you think such an accomplished, strong woman needs the endorsement of any random man, then you are a misogynist. Couldn’t be simpler.
Will you atone for your blatant anti-wokeness to appease PC, or will the choiceless path be to yet again rationalize your way out of the obvious?
promethean75 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:31 pm
"a lot of folks have been screwed by corruption of the system just as Trump is being screwed ... wouldn't you agree?"
Not hardly. The majority of those who will vote for Trump, which are bible thumpin working class, would benefit more if they voted democrat. The minority, big business owners and the like, do better to vote for trump.
Even tho the majority still get fucked by the democrats (who are pro-capitalism), they don't get fucked as hard. It's the lesser of two evils.
No. You're wrong. It is, as I said.
Folks will vote for Trump just to see justice done ... because a lot of folks have been screwed by corruption of the system just as Trump is being screwed.
Even the decent folks you describe have been screwed.
"He could for instance have chosen not to rape her"
I doubt Don T has ever raped anyone. Not even below deck at one of those yacht parties when he was drunk on scotch. He's too much of a p*ssy to rape someone.
What prolly happened was he forced himself on carroll, she wiggled out of it, and then exaggerated what happened so she could sue em.
promethean75 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:19 pm
"He could for instance have chosen not to rape her"
I doubt Don T has ever raped anyone. Not even below deck at one of those yacht parties when he was drunk on scotch. He's too much of a p*ssy to rape someone.
What prolly happened was he forced himself on carroll, she wiggled out of it, and then exaggerated what happened so she could sue em.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not sticking up for the guy. I say sue the shit out of em just for fun. But that doesn't mean I'm on carroll's side either. How she can keep a straight face while suing for 83 million becuz she felt... *cough*... 'defamed'. That's so ridiculous I'm almost insulted.
I can tell u something about what it's like to be 'defamed'. No, like really. Ever read The Scarlett Letter? Multiply that by a hunerd.
promethean75 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:19 pm
"He could for instance have chosen not to rape her"
I doubt Don T has ever raped anyone. Not even below deck at one of those yacht parties when he was drunk on scotch. He's too much of a p*ssy to rape someone.
What prolly happened was he forced himself on carroll, she wiggled out of it, and then exaggerated what happened so she could sue em.
Sometimes it's fairly evident that you think like a sex offender.
