Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 4:10 pm
I'm not interested in viewing any links you post...
I understand. You want to preserve your fantasies and beliefs that buttress your self-concept. To continue that preservation, here's a link concerning your so-called reliable source that you definitely want to ignore. However, anyone with a nose for truth will be interested.
(How is she going to shuck and jive her way around this revelation of her information source corruption? With an accusation and insult, of course.)
Why do you think I'm stuck on the N.Y. Times? Simply because I've referenced stories they've published a couple of times? Get over it. I've referenced many other sources that are known for so much more balance than your absurd entrenched sources. Your source above, the NY Post, is (as always) right-leaning. Unlike you, I don't cling to any of them.
What is it that you think is so misunderstood about Trump's deranged tactics and behavior? Why do you foolishly support such a man? Can't you fathom anything better than that? Why do you lap up all the extremist grossness of your one-sided sources and then spew it all around like you have no control? For fuck sake... take a step back and stop buying into all of it. You know better. Why are you doing this?
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 4:17 pm
Then obviously your purpose here is merely to denigrate, rather than discuss.
What a stupid conclusion. But that's typical for you, right?
LIke I said ...
I gave you a good reason why I don't value your sources. The rest of my commentary is for fun. What is it that you imagine that you are doing here... while you denigrate all things liberal, and support a man who absolutely thrives on denigration?
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 4:10 pm
I'm not interested in viewing any links you post...
I understand. You want to preserve your fantasies and beliefs that buttress your self-concept. To continue that preservation, here's a link concerning your so-called reliable source that you definitely want to ignore. However, anyone with a nose for truth will be interested.
(How is she going to shuck and jive her way around this revelation of her information source corruption? With an accusation and insult, of course.)
Why do you think I'm stuck on the N.Y. Times? Simply because I've referenced stories they've published a couple of times? Get over it. I've referenced many other sources that are known for so much more balance than your absurd entrenched sources. Your source above, the NY Post, is (as always) right-leaning. Unlike you, I don't cling to any of them.
What is it that you think is so misunderstood about Trump's deranged tactics and behavior? Why do you foolishly support such a man? Can't you fathom anything better than that? Why do you lap up all the extremist grossness of your one-sided sources and then spew it all around like you have no control? For fuck sake... take a step back and stop buying into all of it. You know better. Why are you doing this?
*
Lacewing wrote: ... her usual tactic of denigration cloaked as rhetorical questions asserting her flood of beliefs ...
Like I said, your primary purpose is denigration gussied up in Leftist rhetoric that is fashionable to your favourite biased sources.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 7:56 am
It's why I write here. It's my practice afforded by the conditions that define this existence here, to say just the way things are
