Killing in the Name of Religion

[Veritas Aequitas]

Note the recent killing to 2 Swedes in Sweden.
This is done in the name of the religion as a contractual duty of being a contracted believer who has signed a contract with God; the terms of the contract is in the holy text.

ISIS Member Shoots Dead Two Swedes In Brussels, Shares Video With ‘Fighter Of Allah’ Message
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YokQAnV-32Y

Therein the video;

• The killer declared;
  "We live and die for the sake of our religion."
  The attacker claimed to be a member of Islamic State and a "fighter for Allah."
  "Thank God for Islam. I am a jihadi for God's cause with ISIS"
  "Thank God. I will meet my God and my Prophet a happy meeting"
  "Love it or hate it, we live and die for the sale of our religion."
  "Your brother just avenged Islam. I killed 3 Swedes"
  
  He said, the Swedish nationality of the victims was the motivation behind the attack.
  The attacker added that he carried out the attack as "revenge in the name of Muslims"

The grounds and root causes for the above heinous crimes is because;

To be a Muslim proper one MUST enter into a Contract with God before one qualified to be a Muslim.
The contractual term a Muslim must comply with are all in the Quran where he must comply to the best of his abilities. [a handicap or sick Muslim cannot go to war but contribute within his abilities]
There are commands within the constitution [Quran] and contractual terms of a Muslim where he is commanded to kill non-believers in the name of the religion upon the slightest threat to the religion, e.g. being a non-believer, and the like.

As such a Muslim can kill non-believers [upon the slightest threat -fasadin 5:33] in the name of Islam and as permitted within the contractual terms he had contracted [signed, covenanted] as a Muslim officially.

According the terms of the contract, a Muslim will be awarded 10 folds compare to ordinary Muslims if he kills non-believers and more folds if he is martyred.

As such the above murder of the 2 Swedes non-believer is in full compliant with his terms of contract as a good Muslim and as such he will be well rewarded ["happy meeting"] as per the term of contract.

The above news of "2 Swedes" is likely be something fleeing to most of non-Muslims because they are already numbed by the hundreds of thousands of non-believers killed in the name of religion by good compliant Muslims.

The reality is there had been 41,110 deadly fatal attacks [>100,000 dead victims] since 911 on non-believers by good contracted Muslims.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Non-Muslims must wake up and do something about the above potential threat given all the >1.5 billion Muslims are contracted to comply with the terms of their contract which contain evil elements.
The frightening thing is even if [very possible] 10% of Muslim [like >10%] are so compliant, we have 150 millions of 'very good' compliant Muslims [like the attacker above and others in the past] around the world.

Who believe the above is not true? If yes, why?

Discuss?? Views??

[Veritas Aequitas]

Notes: KIV

[Age]

Note the recent killing to 2 Swedes in Sweden.
This is done in the name of the religion as a contractual duty of being a contracted believer who has signed a contract with God; the terms of the contract is in the holy text.

ISIS Member Shoots Dead Two Swedes In Brussels, Shares Video With ‘Fighter Of Allah’ Message
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YokQAnV-32Y

Therein the video;

• The killer declared;
  "We live and die for the sake of our religion."
  The attacker claimed to be a member of Islamic State and a "fighter for Allah."
  "Thank God for Islam. I am a jihadi for God's cause with ISIS"
  "Thank God. I will meet my God and my Prophet a happy meeting"
  "Love it or hate it, we live and die for the sale of our religion."
  "Your brother just avenged Islam. I killed 3 Swedes"
  
  He said, the Swedish nationality of the victims was the motivation behind the attack.
  The attacker added that he carried out the attack as "revenge in the name of Muslims"

The grounds and root causes for the above heinous crimes is because;

To be a Muslim proper one MUST enter into a Contract with God before one qualified to be a Muslim.
The contractual term a Muslim must comply with are all in the Quran where he must comply to the best of his abilities. [a handicap or sick Muslim cannot go to war but contribute within his abilities]
There are commands within the constitution [Quran] and contractual terms of a Muslim where he is commanded to kill non-believers in the name of the religion upon the slightest threat to the religion, e.g. being a non-believer, and the like.

As such a Muslim can kill non-believers [upon the slightest threat -fasadin 5:33] in the name of Islam and as permitted within the contractual terms he had contracted [signed, covenanted] as a Muslim officially.

According the terms of the contract, a Muslim will be awarded 10 folds compare to ordinary Muslims if he kills non-believers and more folds if he is martyred.

As such the above murder of the 2 Swedes non-believer is in full compliant with his terms of contract as a good Muslim and as such he will be well rewarded ["happy meeting"] as per the term of contract.

The above news of "2 Swedes" is likely be something fleeing to most of non-Muslims because they are already numbed by the hundreds of thousands of non-believers killed in the name of religion by good compliant Muslims.

The reality is there had been 41,110 deadly fatal attacks [>100,000 dead victims] on non-believers by good contracted Muslims.

Non-Muslims must wake up and do something about the above potential threat given all the >1.5 billion Muslims are contracted to comply with the terms of their contract which contain evil elements.
The frightening thing is even if [very possible] 10% of Muslim [like >10%] are so compliant, we have 150 millions of 'very good' compliant Muslims [like the attacker above and others in the past] around the world.

Who believe the above is not true?

I KNOW the above is NOT True.

If yes, why?

BECAUSE of the Falsehoods of which 'you' have SPOKEN here.

Discuss?? Views??

'your' LIES and Falsehoods are CLEAR and OBVIOUS "veritas aequitas". But 'you' are TOO BLIND, TO SEE.

[Flannel Jesus]

• The killer declared;
  "We live and die for the sake of our religion."
  The attacker claimed to be a member of Islamic State and a "fighter for Allah."
  "Thank God for Islam. I am a jihadi for God's cause with ISIS"
  "Thank God. I will meet my God and my Prophet a happy meeting"
  "Love it or hate it, we live and die for the sale of our religion."
  "Your brother just avenged Islam. I killed 3 Swedes"
  
  He said, the Swedish nationality of the victims was the motivation behind the attack.
  The attacker added that he carried out the attack as "revenge in the name of Muslims"

Revenge for what exactly?

[Veritas Aequitas]

• The killer declared;
  "We live and die for the sake of our religion."
  The attacker claimed to be a member of Islamic State and a "fighter for Allah."
  "Thank God for Islam. I am a jihadi for God's cause with ISIS"
  "Thank God. I will meet my God and my Prophet a happy meeting"
  "Love it or hate it, we live and die for the sale of our religion."
  "Your brother just avenged Islam. I killed 3 Swedes"
  
  He said, the Swedish nationality of the victims was the motivation behind the attack.
  The attacker added that he carried out the attack as "revenge in the name of Muslims"

Revenge for what exactly?

That is the seriousness of the issue with Islam.
Islam [5:33] permit believers to kill non-believers based on the slightest threat, where even non-believing itself is a threat to them, thus non-believers deserved to be killed in accordance to 5:33.

At present, that attacker as a good Muslim would have 'perceived' Muslims and the religion has been wronged by non-believers, e.g. Israelites occupying their land, killing innocent Muslims and doing other wrongs which qualify as a threat within 5:33.

This attacker believed he is avenging what is wronged on Muslim by killing non-believers [Swedes or any others] as permitted under 5:33 in the belief that he will be greatly rewarded as promised in his contract [mithaaq].

All the above evil is based on fantasies grounded on an illusory God and thus this sort of nonsense of a fantasy-covenant must be stopped.

What is most frightening is, if there are only 10%* of such 'good' compliant Muslims, that would be 150 million of them all around the world. Note it took only around 20++ to do a 911 .
* the reality is it is likely to be >10% perhaps 25% and 50% [750 millions] most likely to turn malignant.
This is why the continuous tsunami of evil waves had never stopped since the religion first emerged and that will continue into the future.

The problem is the majority of non-believers are SO ignorant of the real truths of the religion and grant that any critique of the religion is Islamophobia.
Islamophobia, the irrational fear of the religion, is nonsense re Islam, the real fears and apprehensions toward the religion are really real and warranted as long as it exists.

[promethean75]

Some of those that work forces
Are the same that burn crosses

Uh!

Killing in the name of!

[Veritas Aequitas]

Except TROP [the religion of peace] as the only one [? discuss], there is no religion [the main ones] in their 'Constitution' that permit and condone as a law, the killing of other humans based on the slightest threat or opposition to the religion.
For example in Christianity, the overriding doctrinal maxim from the Gospels [it constitution] is 'love all, even enemies' thus implied no killing of humans.
Buddhism main moral maxim is be compassionate to all human beings and other living entities, thus no killings of humans.

Other than believers of TROP, any one who claimed to kill in the name of their religion is a non-starter because there is nowhere in their religion's Constitution [laws] that permit them [as a law] to kill non-believers upon the slightest threat or any threat at all.

Some will refer to verses from some texts on the fringe [Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism] to counter the above. These are on the fringes and not to regarded as laws that must be complied by believers.
There are terrible evil acts in the OT but they are supposed to be stories and not as laws that is enforceable upon believers of Judaism. This point is heavily disputed.

Views on the above?

[Walker]

I never heard of a Christian hollering "Praise Jesus!" while cutting off someone's head, burning babies alive, or shooting up a room. If that ever happened it was an anomoly and not SOP.

And yet, Christians catch all the crap. That's because of the turn-the-other-cheek petard.

It's like, Hamas blows up a hospital, the media's information source is Hamas, and Hamas blames Israel so media outlets run with it, violating basic journalism. Then, when the lie becomes obvious those who want to believe the lie double down, and the protests against Israel increase at a much louder volume than protests over the unprovoked, coordinated, planned atrocities that started the mess. It's not so much the fog of war as it is the deliberate use of war to lie. It's the propaganda war armed with an eager, compliant media.

[promethean75]

Are the muslim jihadists any more ruthless than the christian god who sends u to hell for eternity if u do not become a Christian?

(didn't see that one comin didja?)

[Veritas Aequitas]

Are the muslim jihadists any more ruthless than the christian god who sends u to hell for eternity if u do not become a Christian?

(didn't see that one comin didja?)

You are not comparing light with light.
The Muslim jihadists are creating real hell on Earth in the name of their religion as commanded by their God.

The IDF is doing the same in North Gaza as a revenge but that is in the name of politics not religion per se.

The hell of Christianity and Islam are fictitious.
The proper comparison is;
which hell, the Christian [in the Gospels] or Islam [in the Quran] is graphically the worst?

Both the Christian and Islam are terrible places but I read the Islamic hell is more graphic, i.e.

• Allah came up with a brilliant way of intensifying pain. Skin has numerous pain sensitive nerves but when its burnt, those nerves are destroyed, so you actually feel less of a pain sensation..So Allah gives you brand new skin every few minutes just to inflict the ultimate agony..

• Q4:56 We will make the rejectors of Our revelations suffer in hell fire. As soon as the fire destroys their skins, We will give them new skins so that they may suffer more of the torment. God is Majestic and All-wise.

This why Muslims are so scared shit of going to hell that they will comply fully with God's command and be good Muslims to be sure of avoiding hell, to the extreme goodness of complying with 5:33.
ISIS and Hamas are strictly religious entity which will comply fully with God's commands.

[promethean75]

See my thinking is quite different than yours, Vintage Artichoke. The christianized empires, as opposed to islamic ones, were the quintessential hypocrits of the day. Their religious doctrine explicitly forbade violence - your boy J couldn't have made this clearer - and yet those smelly pale skinned bastards campaigned across the world destroying and subjugating everything in their path.

Muslims on the other hand are not commanded by their god to remain pacifists in the presence of an existential threat. So, they don't become hypocrits when they go to war... wars they don't start, btw.

When u assess and make comparisons between these religion's integrity, u need to consider the entire history of their activities. That Christians today are meek little wage slaves that are afraid of everything and do what they're told, is not a sign of nobility or grace.

These feeble little people don't fight becuz they choose not too, rather becuz they can't... they have no claws, and then they call themselves 'good' as if they could be otherwise... as if we have been spared their wrath.

Btw, the crusading christian army wuz not unlike jim jordan ya know. Both lost twice in a row and still wouldn't sit the fuck down and shut up.

[Immanuel Can]

Nobody kills "in the name of religion": they all kill in the name of a particular ideology, creed, social plan or "religion."

Nobody kills more than Marxists, of course. They're the grand killers of history. Nobody else comes within orders of magnitude of the Marxists. "Religions," as a combined total, are about 8% of the world's war casualties. 50% of those are from one "religion," namely Islam. The other 3.8% of world causalities are all other so-called "religions" combined...less than are killed in the name of geography, language, race, culture, territory, resources...and, of course, Atheism.

Meanwhile, there's a whole set of what we call "religions" that don't kill anyone. Their statistical combined total is zero deaths: the Quakers, the Mennonites, the Hassidim, the Anabaptists...and unless they are considered by us as not "religious," we can't say that "religion" kills people. We have to say that some "religions" do, perhaps, and others do not.

So which "religion" are we really asking about, here?

[promethean75]

"Nobody kills more than Marxists, of course"

Especially when they're state capitalist dictatorships that are branded as Marxists a hundred years later once enough history as been distorted and capitalism is able to start mass producing the kool aid u drink.

Wait we've done this before... what, five times now?

[Immanuel Can]

"Nobody kills more than Marxists, of course"

Especially when they're state capitalist dictatorships ...

You really think that Maoist China, or Soviet Russia, or Cambodia, or Venezuela, or North Korea...these are "capitalist" regimes, you would say? How amazing that you've discovered that they are so stupid, and you are so wise! They all thought they were Marxist regimes...and you've discovered they were capitalists.

I guess they should have applied to you for a certificate, before declaring themselves Marxist. Those poor billions of fools all got it wrong!

Lovely.

[promethean75]

That's exactly right... maybe even the greatest post you've ever made at this site. You're comin around, mannie. Let us rejoice.