Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2023 10:24 pm
I mean, seriously, what is it about this forum?
It's a capricious place isn't it? I get how all the psychos arrivce here, they all think they are geniuses and that this sort of forum is where they can make their mark.
But we don't exactly give them all equal treatment and perhaps that is unfair. Why does VA get so much attention every day? Skepdick can nomally drag one person per day into his mad hatter universe in a little red square. And intermittently Age finds someone who isn't bored of him yet. None of those guys has really done anything new in years, the most progress comes from Age dropping the "clarifying questions" thing or VA moving from saying 'a thousand times' to 'a million times' when describing his own repetition.
When there's a new nutter, like Constantine was, or that GrandWizard22 fella, obviously they can take centre stage for a fairly long time if their psychiatric condition is amusing enough. That makes sense.
But Advocate, Eggnog7, Roydop.... these guys have been putting a shift and they aren't getting repaid for their effort any more. They've intiated plenty of quite insane threads, they spam as well as any other nutter, but they just don't get the same love. Handjob7 had to invent his own imaginary Spanish friend a while ago to ahve anyone to talk to at all.
I just think it's very sad. Has anyone seen the West Wing? We should have a PN big block of cheese day where we celebrate the forgotten madmen of Philosphy Now.
Isn't it strange how you always leave your name off the list of idiots?
You keep insisting philosophical discourse is a language game, then you keep getting upset when people employ every trick from game theory to fuck with the system. Maybe your social norms are the problem?
Play stupid games - win stupid prizes.
I find it quite perplexing that Flash never mentions me in the wackjob list. I mean, I have the paperwork to prove it courtesy of the delusional psychiatric profession that thinks anyone that states they are getting their arse kicked by God IS the one that is delusional!
Maybe Flash comprehends me. Maybe he remains agnostic about what I have to say..ya, is this guy mad or worth_Y of listening to..mmm, I wonder.
attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2023 10:53 pm
I find it quite perplexing that Flash never mentions me in the wackjob list.
You hold emeritus status.
OK <-- a human laying down. (KO (a human being born))
So.
The weather?
Whether today is a good day for a walk or wot eva, one must look to the weather (just another random "coincidence" in homophonics and logic?).
But certainly, one from the UK that has viewed Ancasta can never look at the UK weather on BBC again without the thought of my rather simple art:
(ps: I know because 'sane' people tell me)
[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=673059 time=1697292415 user_id=11800]
[quote=Iwannaplato post_id=672946 time=1697232286 user_id=3619]
I mean, seriously, what is it about this forum?
[/quote]
It's a capricious place isn't it? I get how all the psychos arrivce here, they all think they are geniuses and that this sort of forum is where they can make their mark.
But we don't exactly give them all equal treatment and perhaps that is unfair. Why does VA get so much attention every day? Skepdick can nomally drag one person per day into his mad hatter universe in a little red square. And intermittently Age finds someone who isn't bored of him yet. None of those guys has really done anything new in years, the most progress comes from Age dropping the "clarifying questions" thing or VA moving from saying 'a thousand times' to 'a million times' when describing his own repetition.
When there's a new nutter, like Constantine was, or that GrandWizard22 fella, obviously they can take centre stage for a fairly long time if their psychiatric condition is amusing enough. That makes sense.
But Advocate, Eggnog7, Roydop.... these guys have been putting a shift and they aren't getting repaid for their effort any more. They've intiated plenty of quite insane threads, they spam as well as any other nutter, but they just don't get the same love. Handjob7 had to invent his own imaginary Spanish friend a while ago to ahve anyone to talk to at all.
I just think it's very sad. Has anyone seen the West Wing? We should have a PN big block of cheese day where we celebrate the forgotten madmen of Philosphy Now.
[/quote]
The True Madmen are those who blather on about everything except the logical train of thought in the OPs.
attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2023 12:14 pm
But certainly, one from the UK that has viewed Ancasta can never look at the UK weather on BBC again without the thought of my rather simple art:
(ps: I know because 'sane' people tell me)
Ancasta
Hmmm, various anatomical questions present themselves...
Did her tits fall off?
Why does she have T-Rex arms growin out of her hips?
Is she in a hidden wheelchair?
What happened to the Orkney's? Have you given them away to Denmark?
Can somebody buy that woman a hairbrush please.
Is Ireland a baby that she's throwing into the ocean?
Did she drop the baby because her arms are not attached to her shoulders?
Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2023 1:36 pm
The True Madmen are those who blather on about everything except the logical train of thought in the OPs.
I’m beginning to think that all amateur philosophers have a mild case of psychiatric illness. Not to be confused with real philosophers.
Amateur philosophers who can fool themselves they are the first to answer the great and perplexing questions that have stymied some of the greatest minds in history are invariably a bit mad at the very least.
[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=673209 time=1697376291 user_id=11800]
[quote=Advocate post_id=673205 time=1697373406 user_id=15238]
The True Madmen are those who blather on about everything except the logical train of thought in the OPs.
[/quote]
You wrote that OP because you are a narcissist and you think you are the greatest person ever to have lived. It's stupid. Nobody cares about it.
[/quote]
Here's a breakdown of the areas i in which i can answer everything coherently;
•Ontology = the most basic understanding of our place in the universe
•Mereology = how parts and wholes relate, Universal Taxonomy
•Meta-philosophy = how philosophy should be divided and understood in relation to all knowledge
•Metaphysics = all of the deepest "what is the nature of x" questions, also a general term for everything on this list
•Proto-physics = the metaphysics of physical things, metaphors for time, space, energy, matter, etc.
•Meta-epistemology = the metaphysics of knowledge, truth, certainty, etc.
slightly less certain, but probably still best;
•Meta-ethics = the metaphysics of right and wrong, how to understand what we want, and how to get it
Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2023 6:37 pm
Here's a breakdown of the areas i in which i can answer everything coherently;
•Ontology = the most basic understanding of our place in the universe
•Mereology = how parts and wholes relate, Universal Taxonomy
•Meta-philosophy = how philosophy should be divided and understood in relation to all knowledge
•Metaphysics = all of the deepest "what is the nature of x" questions, also a general term for everything on this list
•Proto-physics = the metaphysics of physical things, metaphors for time, space, energy, matter, etc.
•Meta-epistemology = the metaphysics of knowledge, truth, certainty, etc.
slightly less certain, but probably still best;
•Meta-ethics = the metaphysics of right and wrong, how to understand what we want, and how to get it
Is there any portion of philosophy where you are not the greatest of all time?
[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=673255 time=1697391685 user_id=11800]
[quote=Advocate post_id=673252 time=1697391471 user_id=15238]
Here's a breakdown of the areas i in which i can answer everything coherently;
•Ontology = the most basic understanding of our place in the universe
•Mereology = how parts and wholes relate, Universal Taxonomy
•Meta-philosophy = how philosophy should be divided and understood in relation to all knowledge
•Metaphysics = all of the deepest "what is the nature of x" questions, also a general term for everything on this list
•Proto-physics = the metaphysics of physical things, metaphors for time, space, energy, matter, etc.
•Meta-epistemology = the metaphysics of knowledge, truth, certainty, etc.
slightly less certain, but probably still best;
•Meta-ethics = the metaphysics of right and wrong, how to understand what we want, and how to get it
[/quote]
Is there any portion of philosophy where you are not the greatest of all time?
[/quote]
