What do you mean?

[Atla]

Okay, but I will not ask you, 'What do you mean, here, exactly?', as I have no interest at all really now.

Also, what we have here is ANOTHER example of one with a PREEXISTING view, and PRESUMPTION, which has affected the way they look AT and are SEEING 'things' here.

Everyone does including you and it couldn't be otherwise, that's the dumbest thing you said so far.

So, saying some 'thing', which you are ONCE AGAIN making A PRESUMPTION about, and which you THINK you AGREE WITH, to you, is the dumbest thing I have said, so far, right?

Have you tried not having any memories, preconceptions about anything ever, and becoming 100% catatonic or having 100% random behaviour because of that? Idiot

[Age]

Everyone does including you and it couldn't be otherwise, that's the dumbest thing you said so far.

So, saying some 'thing', which you are ONCE AGAIN making A PRESUMPTION about, and which you THINK you AGREE WITH, to you, is the dumbest thing I have said, so far, right?

Have you tried not having any memories, preconceptions about anything ever, and becoming 100% catatonic or having 100% random behaviour because of that? Idiot

NO.

BUT I CAN and DO, VERY EASILY and VERY SIMPLY, NOT make JUDGMENTS and have Assumptions based on Past Experiences, a LOT of the 'time' here. Which is, obviously, NOT what 'you' do here, "atla".

[Age]

Everyone does including you and it couldn't be otherwise, that's the dumbest thing you said so far.

So, saying some 'thing', which you are ONCE AGAIN making A PRESUMPTION about, and which you THINK you AGREE WITH, to you, is the dumbest thing I have said, so far, right?

Have you tried not having any memories, preconceptions about anything ever, and becoming 100% catatonic or having 100% random behaviour because of that? Idiot

Are 'you' ABLE to just ANSWER a CLARIFYING QUESTION posed, and ASKED TO 'you' "atla", WITHOUT DEFLECTING or DETRACTING in one or another way, like 'you' have done here, AGAIN?

[Atla]

So, saying some 'thing', which you are ONCE AGAIN making A PRESUMPTION about, and which you THINK you AGREE WITH, to you, is the dumbest thing I have said, so far, right?

Have you tried not having any memories, preconceptions about anything ever, and becoming 100% catatonic or having 100% random behaviour because of that? Idiot

Are 'you' ABLE to just ANSWER a CLARIFYING QUESTION posed, and ASKED TO 'you' "atla", WITHOUT DEFLECTING or DETRACTING in one or another way, like 'you' have done here, AGAIN?

Yes, when your clarifying questions are relevant and don't imply that you're insane, I may.

[Age]

Have you tried not having any memories, preconceptions about anything ever, and becoming 100% catatonic or having 100% random behaviour because of that? Idiot

Are 'you' ABLE to just ANSWER a CLARIFYING QUESTION posed, and ASKED TO 'you' "atla", WITHOUT DEFLECTING or DETRACTING in one or another way, like 'you' have done here, AGAIN?

Yes, when your clarifying questions are relevant and don't imply that you're insane, I may.

So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?

Also, 'relevance', or not, is very subjective, and thus very relative, to 'the observer'. So, what this 'means' is that what 'you', "atla" may find irrelevant or not relevant here 'we' and/or 'I' could.

Furthermore, I AM SURE that 'you' are ACTUALLY ABLE TO just ANSWER CLARIFYING QUESTIONS under OTHER circumstances, although 'you' may well BELIEVE otherwise.

[Atla]

Yes, when your clarifying questions are relevant and don't imply that you're insane, I may.

So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?

No. See, for example a saner person wouldn't ask
"So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?"

The above question is indicative that you have little to no idea about how people form views about others. Why would I just focus on your questions and ignore everything else?

[Age]

Yes, when your clarifying questions are relevant and don't imply that you're insane, I may.

So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?

No. See, for example a saner person wouldn't ask
"So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?"

The above question is indicative that you have little to no idea about how people form views about others.

LOL

ONCE AGAIN, 'you' have INFERRED some 'thing' based, SOLELY, ON ASKED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS ALONE.


Why would I just focus on your questions and ignore everything else?

Are you even AWARE that you SAID and WROTE previously here, 'when your clarifying questions don't imply that you're insane'?

If no, then 'you' DID.

Now, from these words OF 'YOURS' it could be INFERRED that 'you' BASE the sanity, it insanity, if "another" ON 'clarifying questions, and this is BECAUSE 'you' NEVER STIPULATED ANY thing ELSE BUT ON the 'clarifying questions' ALONE.

Also, 'you' have absolutely NO idea NOR clue what MY WORDS ACTUAL MEAN NOR ACTUALLY 'indicate' UNTIL 'you' SEEK OUT and OBTAIN ACTUALLY CLARITY. As ' CONTINUALLY PROVE True here. 'you' INFER 'things' FROM what I SAY and WRITE. And, what I ACTUALLY MEAN IS STILL UNKNOWN TO 'you' "atla".

[Atla]

So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?

No. See, for example a saner person wouldn't ask
"So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?"

The above question is indicative that you have little to no idea about how people form views about others.

LOL

ONCE AGAIN, 'you' have INFERRED some 'thing' based, SOLELY, ON ASKED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS ALONE.


Why would I just focus on your questions and ignore everything else?

Are you even AWARE that you SAID and WROTE previously here, 'when your clarifying questions don't imply that you're insane'?

If no, then 'you' DID.

Now, from these words OF 'YOURS' it could be INFERRED that 'you' BASE the sanity, it insanity, if "another" ON 'clarifying questions, and this is BECAUSE 'you' NEVER STIPULATED ANY thing ELSE BUT ON the 'clarifying questions' ALONE.

Also, 'you' have absolutely NO idea NOR clue what MY WORDS ACTUAL MEAN NOR ACTUALLY 'indicate' UNTIL 'you' SEEK OUT and OBTAIN ACTUALLY CLARITY. As ' CONTINUALLY PROVE True here. 'you' INFER 'things' FROM what I SAY and WRITE. And, what I ACTUALLY MEAN IS STILL UNKNOWN TO 'you' "atla".

No, as I just said, I didn't infer that 'thing' on that question alone.
See? You have to be genuinely retarded to not realize that.
The question is why do you WANT so much to be, stay retarded?

[Age]

No. See, for example a saner person wouldn't ask
"So, you make ASSUMPTIONS and/or INFER that "another" could be, or is, 'insane' based in just some questions ALONE, right?"

The above question is indicative that you have little to no idea about how people form views about others.

LOL

ONCE AGAIN, 'you' have INFERRED some 'thing' based, SOLELY, ON ASKED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS ALONE.


Why would I just focus on your questions and ignore everything else?

Are you even AWARE that you SAID and WROTE previously here, 'when your clarifying questions don't imply that you're insane'?

If no, then 'you' DID.

Now, from these words OF 'YOURS' it could be INFERRED that 'you' BASE the sanity, it insanity, if "another" ON 'clarifying questions, and this is BECAUSE 'you' NEVER STIPULATED ANY thing ELSE BUT ON the 'clarifying questions' ALONE.

Also, 'you' have absolutely NO idea NOR clue what MY WORDS ACTUAL MEAN NOR ACTUALLY 'indicate' UNTIL 'you' SEEK OUT and OBTAIN ACTUALLY CLARITY. As ' CONTINUALLY PROVE True here. 'you' INFER 'things' FROM what I SAY and WRITE. And, what I ACTUALLY MEAN IS STILL UNKNOWN TO 'you' "atla".

No, as I just said, I didn't infer that 'thing' on that question alone.

I KNOW. 'you' SAID 'this' AFTER I ASKED 'you' ANOTHER CLARIFYING QUESTION.

'your' PREVIOUSLY WORDS, however, as I POINTED and SHOWED could suggest otherwise.

See?

WHY SAY ONE WORD, and then put a question mark at the end?

You have to be genuinely retarded to not realize that.

One could just as SIMPLY and EASILY SAY that 'you', "atla", would have to be GENUINELY RETARDED to NOT REALIZE what IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING and GOING ON here.

'you' would ALSO HAVE TO BE GENUINELY RETARDED TO NOT REALIZE that what 'you' SAID and WROTE IS VERY CLEAR, BUT that one does NOT HAVE TO TAKE 'your' WORD ON 'face value'. Especially considering what 'your' PREVIOUS WORDS were POINTING TO, EXACTLY.

The question is why do you WANT so much to be, stay retarded?

Would you like to REPHRASE 'this question' of 'yours' here "atla"?

Also, and by the way, that 'you' BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that 'I' AM COMPLETELY RETARDED IS FULFILLING MY GOAL here.

Let us NOT forget that the meanings you give words define the accuracy, truthfulness, and correctness of the statements you use.

[Atla]

...

Well I guess it's time to conclude that this form of (partially willful?) insanity can't be helped either. One more form of evil in the world. Okay.

[Age]

...

Well I guess it's time to conclude that this form of (partially willful?) insanity can't be helped either. One more form of evil in the world. Okay.

What do 'you' mean by using the 'evil' word here "atla"?

[Age]

...

Well I guess it's time to conclude that this form of (partially willful?) insanity can't be helped either. One more form of evil in the world. Okay.

'you' are ABSOLUTELY FREE to 'conclude' absolutely ANY 'thing' 'you' like here "atla". But, 'concluding' 'things' based upon one's OWN ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS can be described as ANOTHER form of 'insanity'.

[Atla]

...

Well I guess it's time to conclude that this form of (partially willful?) insanity can't be helped either. One more form of evil in the world. Okay.

'you' are ABSOLUTELY FREE to 'conclude' absolutely ANY 'thing' 'you' like here "atla". But, 'concluding' 'things' based upon one's OWN ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS can be described as ANOTHER form of 'insanity'.

That's what the insane always say

[Age]

...

Well I guess it's time to conclude that this form of (partially willful?) insanity can't be helped either. One more form of evil in the world. Okay.

What happens if one ACHIEVES 'world peace' through and by SHOWING how SOME people CONCLUDE that one may well be 'partially willfully' APPEARING to be 'insane'?

Would the way that CREATED 'world peace', which NEVER actually 'hurt' NOR 'harmed' ANY one REALLY be one more 'form of evil' to 'you' "atla"?

In fact would doing absolutely ANY 'thing', which does NOT 'hurt' NOR 'harm' absolutely ANY one REALLY be 'one more form of evil' to 'you', "atla"?

Are 'you' SO DETERMINED to SHOW that 'you' ARE SANE, and 'your views' ARE TRUE and RIGHT, and that "another" IS INSANE, and 'their views', ARE RANDOM NONSENSE REALLY SO IMPORTANT to 'you', "atla"?

[Age]

Well I guess it's time to conclude that this form of (partially willful?) insanity can't be helped either. One more form of evil in the world. Okay.

'you' are ABSOLUTELY FREE to 'conclude' absolutely ANY 'thing' 'you' like here "atla". But, 'concluding' 'things' based upon one's OWN ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS can be described as ANOTHER form of 'insanity'.

That's what the insane always say

LOL

'Black and white thinking' in its EXTREME here.

LOL WHEN has ABSOLUTELY ANY one SAID what 'I' just WROTE and SAID above here, let alone the so-called 'insane' ALWAYS SAYING 'that'?