Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
Although we human beings might often think of ourselves as being a certain, consistent mindset/personality...
BUT ONLY SOME of 'you', human beings, might often think such a 'thing'.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
it seems that we actually have varying versions of ourselves that can be brought forth and utilized for different purposes as needed.
BUT although 'you', individually, might perceive or visualize that there are varying versions of "yourselves", there, OBVIOUSLY, IS One True AND Right 'version', ONLY.
And, WHEN 'you' ALSO UNCOVER 'this version', then 'you' WILL ALSO DISCOVER WHY ALL of 'those varying versions' existed, PREVIOUSLY.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
Depending on the circumstances we are in at any given moment, we can 'shift' to fill and play many 'roles' in life: lover, fighter, worker, parent, child, friend, etc.
Which ARE ALL 'delusional' 'versions' ONLY, as "dontaskme" KEEPS POINTING OUT and CLAIMING.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
In recognizing this adaptive and flexible capability, I think it points to the likelihood of even more untapped 'shifting' capability.
BUT, 'shifting' INTO 'differing acts' or 'playing' 'differing roles' IS just MORE 'acting', on the stage of 'Life', as some have previously mentioned.
Also, WHY even 'shift' into DIFFERENT 'acting roles' WHEN just being thee True Self IS FAR MORE EASIER, and SIMPLER?
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
In contrast to claiming some distinct rigid version of ourselves: '
this is who I am'... '
this is what I do'... 'this is
ME', we might instead allow the versions of ourselves to arise that do things better and have more fun than the rigid versions.

After all, how did we become convinced that we were to be so narrowly defined?
BY HOLDING BELIEFS, and, PRESUMING SOME 'versions' are even true.
One example of CLAIMING some distinct rigid version of "oneself" is INSISTING that 'there is NO one truth'. While HAVING and HOLDING this VERY RIGID BELIEF 'one' IS HOLDING and CLAIMING A VERY RIGID 'version' OF "themself"
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
Here's my own personal example. I lived alone in the woods for many years. Although I had lots of friends and threw lots of parties, I truly treasured my 'hermit' time, and not seeing anyone for weeks! At the same time, I desired a uniquely compatible partner to share and witness that wonderful life with me. Someone to play with in our hermit sanctuary. Naturally I had certain ideas about what that partner and reality would look like and feel like. What I hadn't considered was my own shift. I couldn't actually fathom it.
'I was who I was.'
Then, after so many years, I met a 'compatible soul'. It could have ended so easily... amidst all the wariness and unfamiliar territory and expectations.
But a suggestion arose in my mind:
ONCE AGAIN, 'you', human beings, do NOT have 'your mind/s'.
But, PLEASE, do NOT let this IRREFUTABLE Truth get in THE WAY of the VERY RIGID OF "yourself" that 'you' HAVE "lacewing".
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
Be the version of yourself
that has a successful relationship.
LOL
LOL
LOL
So, ONCE AGAIN, SWAPPED OUT one 'acting role' VERSION of "oneself" FOR ANOTHER 'acting role', which just SEEMS and APPEARS to be better, ONLY.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
I think
that somehow shifted me into greater possibility with the right circumstance. I did not sacrifice or lose my authenticity in any way...
But HOW do 'you', 'the ever-changing actor, and, 'role player', DISCERN, Accurately, between what IS 'your authenticity' and what IS NOT?
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
in fact, his extraordinary acceptance and love has enabled me to expand and express myself
even more.
AND, what IS 'it', EXACTLY, which is, SUPPOSEDLY, 'expanding' and 'expressing' here?
OBVIOUSLY, the term and phrase "myself" IS an OXYMORON.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
None of this was possible, though, until I shifted my idea (my version) I was set on for myself.
How fixed are we?
Some, like 'you', "lacewing", are EXTREMELY RIGIDLY FIXED. Just like ALL of 'you', adult human beings, ARE, and WERE, back, in the days when this is being written.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
We might not even realize how 'fixed' we become in our view of a certain version of ourselves...
AND 'you', "lacewing", here ARE A PRIME example, and A LIVING PROOF, OF 'this'.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
and our view of what's possible or what must be...
Well 'you' have been PROVING, IRREFUTABLY, just HOW UNAWARE 'you' ARE of just HOW FIXED and RIGID some of 'your' views REALLY ARE.
Or, maybe 'you' ARE AWARE and have ALREADY REALIZED but just do NOT WANT BECOME MORE FLEXIBLE, and OPEN.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
and that fixation perpetuates a certain reality.
AGAIN, OF WHICH 'you' have been CLEARLY SHOWING here.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
Like computer software, we can allow 'upgrades' (with expanded features)... it doesn't change '
who/what we are'... and yes, there will be software 'bugs' to contend with

...but old software programs are not effective or compatible with the ever-evolving operating system of our reality.
HOW ABOUT INSTEAD OF CONTINUALLY 'updating', or 'changing' TO DIFFERENT 'versions' or DIFFERENT 'roles', 'you' JUST BE 'who' AND 'what' 'you' REALLY ARE, ONLY.
Oh, that is right, 'you' have NOT YET LEARNED and UNDERSTOOD 'who' AND 'what' 'you' Truly ARE YET. SO, WHAT ABOUT JUST BECOMING Truly OPEN, AGAIN, and JUST REMAINING Truly OPEN ALWAYS?
SEE, IF, and WHEN, 'one' DOES, then there is absolutely NOTHING TO 'update' NOR 'change'. AS 'you' WOULD BE CONSTANTLY-CHANGING, AND FLOWING, as One, WITH thee Universe AND the ACTUAL Truth OF 'things', themselves.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
Nor are our old programs capable of keeping up with our own broadening visions.
WHY do 'you' IMAGINE 'you' have STILL NOT YET BEEN ABLE TO SEE that ABSOLUTELY CRYSTAL CLEAR and OBVIOUS Fact that by JUST BECOMING and REMAINING OPEN, ALWAYS, MEANS that 'you' ARE IN and AT the BROADEST OF 'versions' POSSIBLE, AND FOREVER MORE I WILL ADD?
Could the REASON WHY 'you' HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO SEE and UNDERSTAND 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact and Truth, YET, BE BECAUSE of 'your', current, FIXED and RIGID views and BELIEFS?
Could 'they' have BEEN HOLDING 'you' BACK, and PREVENTING and STOPPING 'you' FROM SEEING the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth OF 'things' here, PREVIOUSLY?
Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm
And pretty much nobody wants to sit down at an old clunky computer anymore, so we need to demonstrate/offer more of our capability if we want someone's interaction.
So, WHY ARE 'you', "lacewing", ACTING, and PLAYING the ROLE, of the VERY 'old clunky computer' here, STILL?