Wow! Our experiences had some similar elements except that mine didn't involve any sexual acts or Franzia Red... oh, and mine was real, while yours is just another one of your many demented distortions because that's what always serves you.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 3:39 pmYou're right, of course.
It like that night recently when I stood naked atop the center stone of a stone circle as two naked broads danced around within the circle and eight naked broads stood atop tall stone pillars. Mist enveloped us, and one of the gals started playing my flute (if you catch my drift...) and another one exclaimed this is the best fucking thing I've ever experienced! It was beautiful and other-worldly, and made possible by a chilled box of Franzia Red.
Christianity
Re: Christianity
Re: Christianity
But WHY say, 'sorry', when you WILL do 'it' AGAIN?attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 12:43 pmAlexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 11:00 am I dreamed I was a Roomba in what I took to be God’s extremely bourgeois mansion. As I algorithmed my way around behind every door was an enormous hen with half its scalp pecked off. It was horrible, people, horrible!![]()
I must again apologise Jacobi for my antics in another thread (and seeds if you r reading..maybe even Lacewing) I've come to real eyes that I turn into a gradual arsehole with the application of beer. Watching the womens world cup - and my God those girls would run circles around me on the pitch - the skill level is up there with the men, just a different tempo - or something - but ya consumed booze, and then this morning checked the forum and saw what a dickhead I had turned into....so sorry everyone just call me attotwat!
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
You're right, of course.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:01 pmWow! Our experiences had some similar elements except that mine *didn't involve any sexual acts or **Franzia Red... oh, and mine was real, while yours is just another one of your many demented distortions because that's what always serves you.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 3:39 pmYou're right, of course.
It like that night recently when I stood naked atop the center stone of a stone circle as two naked broads danced around within the circle and eight naked broads stood atop tall stone pillars. Mist enveloped us, and one of the gals started playing my flute (if you catch my drift...) and another one exclaimed this is the best fucking thing I've ever experienced! It was beautiful and other-worldly, and made possible by a chilled box of Franzia Red.
It was your whorish experience, not mine.
*sure, of course not...
**no, it was someone's brew of hard cider
Re: Christianity
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2023 4:07 pmHarry, you believe the chicken is capable of suffering, exhibits suffering, and has a mind of sorts.
I believe the chicken is not capable of suffering, does not exhibit suffering, and is only a mindless meat machine.
Coming from the one that anthropomorphizes 'God', Itself, SO MUCH and to the VERY POINT of calling and labeling God, Itself, 'a person', what 'you' are SAYING and CLAIMING here "henry quirk" could be EXTREMELY HYPOCRITICAL.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2023 4:07 pm Do you believe the unborn human body is capable of suffering? Does 'it' exhibit suffering? Is 'it' more than a 'mindless meat machine'?
You, and others, believe you see the chicken suffering (it acts in ways you say indicate it suffers).
I believe you, and others, misinterpret the chicken's actions. I don't believe you, and others, are assessing accurately.
You would have me agree God built the chicken to mimic suffering.
I will not becuz the chicken is not mimicking suffering; you, and others, are anthropomorphizing it. It's reactions are canned. it does not, cannot, respond. There's no one behind its fowl lil eyes.
You, and others, see what you want to; you are not seein' what's actually there. You overlay personhood on that which is not a person.
Also, I have NOT seen ANY one so-called 'overlaying personhood' on 'that' which is NOT a person.
But, ONLY the Truly BLIND, mentally, could NOT SEE that animals, like chickens, can SUFFER.
Re: Christianity
you HAVE SAID and CLAIMED that you WOULD KILL your OWN family members IF they just 'touched your toothpick', expecting 'you', "henry quirk", to HELP absolutely ANY one, if 'they were on fire', as you say, would be EXTREMELY UNEXPECTED.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 2:08 pm*Of folks I wouldn't waste the contents of my bladder on if they were on fire...**it's like Green Stamps or Marlboro Bucks: fill a book and you trade 'em in for cool shit like toasters and transistor radios.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 1:49 pm*A full set of what? **And for what purpose would this set be needed or wanted to "have"?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 1:39 pm Let's see here: I got the gamma, the slut, the three psycho-cripples, and the well-spoken man of leisure arrayed against my chicken-abusin', neanderthal self.
If I can get the fractured, the vacuous, the dick-waggler, and NZ's finest to pipe in I'll have me a full set.
Re: Christianity
Why are some men so ignorant as to unjustly paint women as whores for any innocently free behavior outside of dumbass patriarchal double-standard conventions?
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
It was from some of the examples provided here by "henry quirk" thinks and writes that this is WHY, in the days when this was being written, they were SEEN as some of the DARKEST DAYS throughout human history.
If "henry quirk's" OWN words were NOT here in 'print' for ALL to LOOK AT and SEE, some people would NOT believe that some people could have ACTUALLY been that BLIND and STUPID to think and view 'things' 'that way'.
Last edited by Age on Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
YES you HAVE.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:31 pmNo, Smeagol. Never said it.
You, though, that's another matter.
AND, it IS here for ALL or ANY to LOOK AT, and SEE.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
citation: let's have itAge wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:34 pmYES you HAVE.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:31 pmNo, Smeagol. Never said it.
You, though, that's another matter.
AND, it IS here for ALL or ANY to LOOK AT, and SEE.
Re: Christianity
WHY is 'this' the ONLY 'thing' you CHALLENGE and/or QUESTION me OVER, and ABOUT?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:35 pmcitation: let's have itAge wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:34 pmYES you HAVE.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:31 pm
No, Smeagol. Never said it.
You, though, that's another matter.
AND, it IS here for ALL or ANY to LOOK AT, and SEE.
WHY do you NOT QUESTION NOR CHALLENGE me OVER my CLAIM that animals, like chickens, ACTUALLY DO HAVE 'feelings'?
Or, QUESTION or CHALLENGE me OVER how you ACTUALLY DO anthropomorphize and personalize 'things' "yourself" like, LAUGHABLY, God, Itself?
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
So, no citation, Smeagol?Age wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:36 pmWHY is 'this' the ONLY 'thing' you CHALLENGE and/or QUESTION me OVER, and ABOUT?
WHY do you NOT QUESTION NOR CHALLENGE me OVER my CLAIM that animals, like chickens, ACTUALLY DO HAVE 'feelings'?
Or, QUESTION or CHALLENGE me OVER how you ACTUALLY DO anthropomorphize and personalize 'things' "yourself" like, LAUGHABLY, God, Itself?
Of course not.
There ain't nuthin' to cite.
You. Are. Dismissed.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11753
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Christianity
I was just trying to find out if he thinks war is "glorious" also. Can't trust everyone on the Internet.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 3:39 pmOf sheer lunatics. What kinda question is that Gary?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 1:49 pm A full set of what? And for what purpose would this set be needed or wanted to "have"?