bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 10:41 am
Quadia are substances that are the subject of experience and causation. Quadia have properties so-called Qualia.
Ah, so you're taking the Trumpian approach, which is to double-down on horse crap statements in the hope that everyone else is just too dumb to notice.
Good grief, bahman, don't you even bother to Google the definition of a word in question before you defend your usage of it?
I don't know why I am bothering with this,...
(perhaps it's because we've argued over your erroneous interpretation and usage of the word "qualia" before)
...anyway, if you Google the word "Quadia," you'll find out that it is the name of an investment company, and that's pretty much it.
In an extended search there is absolutely no trace of the word "Quadia" being related to the word "qualia."
In fact, if you Google "qualia," you will come across a link titled:
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 3:26 pm
We know that a specific area of the brain is for thinking. We know this from several sources, one of them being that people with injury to that area of the brain cannot think.
These people, back then, although seemingly ABSOLUTELY INCAPABLE of just EXPLAINING what they ACTUALLY MEANT, in what they SAID, ALSO appear to be ABSOLUTELY INCOMPETENT in just COMPREHENSION and UNDERSTANDING.
I ASK, 'What do 'you' mean by, ... [whatever]? and then they point or link me to what "SOMEONE ELSE" means.
It literally, feels like FOREVER trying to get these people to just provide CLARITY for their OWN 'words' that they SAY, CLAIM, WRITE, or USE.
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 3:26 pm
So that is it plain and simple.
So, 'what' is 'it', EXACTLY?
What are 'you' 'thinking' 'you' have ACTUALLY explained here now, EXACTLY?
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 3:26 pm
ANd please tell us the truth if you know that the thing is the other way around instead of asking more questions.
'you' are the one CLAIMING 'you' KNOW the truth of 'things' here. So, I just ASK 'those' who ARE SO SURE OF "themselves" CLARIFYING QUESTIONS.
These people, back then, although seemingly ABSOLUTELY INCAPABLE of just EXPLAINING what they ACTUALLY MEANT, in what they SAID, ALSO appear to be ABSOLUTELY INCOMPETENT in just COMPREHENSION and UNDERSTANDING.
I ASK, 'What do 'you' mean by, ... [whatever]? and then they point or link me to what "SOMEONE ELSE" means.
It literally, feels like FOREVER trying to get these people to just provide CLARITY for their OWN 'words' that they SAY, CLAIM, WRITE, or USE.
These people, back then, although seemingly ABSOLUTELY INCAPABLE of just EXPLAINING what they ACTUALLY MEANT, in what they SAID, ALSO appear to be ABSOLUTELY INCOMPETENT in just COMPREHENSION and UNDERSTANDING.
I ASK, 'What do 'you' mean by, ... [whatever]? and then they point or link me to what "SOMEONE ELSE" means.
It literally, feels like FOREVER trying to get these people to just provide CLARITY for their OWN 'words' that they SAY, CLAIM, WRITE, or USE.
These people, back then, although seemingly ABSOLUTELY INCAPABLE of just EXPLAINING what they ACTUALLY MEANT, in what they SAID, ALSO appear to be ABSOLUTELY INCOMPETENT in just COMPREHENSION and UNDERSTANDING.
I ASK, 'What do 'you' mean by, ... [whatever]? and then they point or link me to what "SOMEONE ELSE" means.
It literally, feels like FOREVER trying to get these people to just provide CLARITY for their OWN 'words' that they SAY, CLAIM, WRITE, or USE.
And what are you basing 'this' ON, EXACTLY?
What does "this" refer to?
YOUR CLAIM that, I do NOT know the truth about 'sense of self'?
seeds wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 6:33 pm
Ah, so you're taking the Trumpian approach, which is to double-down on horse crap statements in the hope that everyone else is just too dumb to notice.
Good grief, bahman, don't you even bother to Google the definition of a word in question before you defend your usage of it?
I don't know why I am bothering with this,...
(perhaps it's because we've argued over your erroneous interpretation and usage of the word "qualia" before)
...anyway, if you Google the word "Quadia," you'll find out that it is the name of an investment company, and that's pretty much it.
In an extended search there is absolutely no trace of the word "Quadia" being related to the word "qualia."
In fact, if you Google "qualia," you will come across a link titled:
Again, bahman, you need to make the minimal effort required to verify whether your sources actually contain the information you are referencing them for.
Nowhere in the post offered-up by Skepdick is the word "Quadia."
bahman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 9:24 am
What does "this" refer to?
YOUR CLAIM that, I do NOT know the truth about 'sense of self'?
I don't know. You know, then tell us.
Thank you for Honesty about you NOT even knowing what you are basing your OWN CLAIM on here.
This is just ANOTHER prime example of the BELIEF-system at work, and at play.
These people, back then, BELIEVED 'things' the be true, but had absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER AT ALL to BASE some of those BELIEFS ON. As just CLEARLY SHOWN.
Again, bahman, you need to make the minimal effort required to verify whether your sources actually contain the information you are referencing them for.
Nowhere in the post offered-up by Skepdick is the word "Quadia."
What else ya got?
_______
I've never heard the word "Quadia" before either. I presumed bah man made a typo...?
Again, bahman, you need to make the minimal effort required to verify whether your sources actually contain the information you are referencing them for.
Nowhere in the post offered-up by Skepdick is the word "Quadia."
bahman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 3:10 pm
Strange, the link does not for me either. Anyway, here is the link to post of Skepdick: viewtopic.php?p=571448#p571448
Again, bahman, you need to make the minimal effort required to verify whether your sources actually contain the information you are referencing them for.
Nowhere in the post offered-up by Skepdick is the word "Quadia."
What else ya got?
_______
I've never heard the word "Quadia" before either. I presumed bah man made a typo...?
Yes, and that would be understandable and forgivable.
However, not only did he double-down on using the same typo twice, but he now has the gall to pretend that he never used the word "Quadia" and has replaced it with "quidia."
And seeing how I have no life and nothing else to do at the moment, I'm going to keep giving him a hard time about it.
I suspect that he's just messing with me as I am messing with him.
_______
bahman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 3:10 pm
Strange, the link does not for me either. Anyway, here is the link to post of Skepdick: viewtopic.php?p=571448#p571448
Again, bahman, you need to make the minimal effort required to verify whether your sources actually contain the information you are referencing them for.
Nowhere in the post offered-up by Skepdick is the word "Quadia."
What else ya got?
_______
It is there: quidia -- mental what-it-is-ness.
Have you completely lost your mind?
"quidia" is not the same word as "Quadia"!!!
Just admit that you made a typo (as was suggested by Wizzard22) and be done with this.
_______
