Can one say that 1 and 2 are true? I would say no.1. What exist as most real is verifiable by the scientific FSR-FSK.
2. God and soul are not dealt within the ambit of the credible FSK-FSK.
3. Therefore, it is impossible for God and soul to exists as real.
The problem is they're full of unclear words and phrases.
What is "most real"? How is it different from plain "real"?
What is a "credible FSK"?
What does "ambit" man in this case? It's defined as scope, extent or bounds. So does it mean that God and soul are out of bounds of this "credible FSK" and therefore this FSK can say nothing about God and soul? If yes, then the FSK can't be used to draw conclusions about God and soul. Or does it mean something else?
"Verifiable" seems to be confused with observable or detectable. One needs to observe or detect something before one can do any verification. Have God and soul been observed? Perhaps not yet. Do instruments exist which can detect God and soul? Perhaps not yet.
Which means that God and soul may exist but we simply don't know because of the limitations of our senses and the scientific FSK.