It will cost you your soul, Gary.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:55 pmHow much will it cost me to "sign up"?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:51 pmNow that is as good question! I go into that in the very first section of the email course.
Are you ready to sign up?
Christianity
Re: Christianity
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Christianity
Well, that's about the only thing I have left after I gave just about everything I have in vain to the woman I'm in love with. And, at this point, I might need it if there is an afterlife because I feel closer than ever to the point of finding the answer to whether or not there is one.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:59 pmIt will cost you your soul, Gary.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:55 pmHow much will it cost me to "sign up"?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:51 pm
Now that is as good question! I go into that in the very first section of the email course.
Are you ready to sign up?
¯\_(*_*)_/¯
Re: Christianity
Only a scam man, a con man, would ever think of making money out of what is ultimately free to discover at any moment, when the student is ready to let go of all the absurd falsity of their cultish conditioned indoctrinated education.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:51 pmNow that is as good question! I go into that in the very first section of the email course.
Are you ready to sign up?
Remember, no one, or thing ever read an instruction manual as to the how life was possible at all, prior to it being the experience, and yet here it is, the experience of life, in it's entire content,in a universe that is fully formed, with no idea how it was formed, and not an instruction manual in sight as to how this in-formation was possible, neither is there any hope of there ever being any chance of reproducing it exactly with your theory or idea.
There is no way you can tell yourself who or what you are except as a personal conceptual model, using an imagined conceptual overlay, a pretentious label, a poor subsitute of a model of your own making, one of many available to the human mind, and one that you yourself will be so sure of, you'll believe people will want to buy it. And yet, like many other false models, it will never resemble anything of any originality, in any way shape or form, ever...
Nothing is original. Steal from anywhere that resonates with inspiration or fuels your imagination and scam and con away to yourself and others until the cows come home, MOO...you are just many of the one, here today gone tomorrow, it's all you will be capable of achieving here, building sandcastles with sand that has always existed and was never your property to sell off in the first place.
.
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27622
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Christianity
Well, one can DO it, of course. But not and be right about that.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:34 amWhy not; what's to stop you?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 3:41 am Christianity isn't a flavouring. You can't sprinkle some of it over paganism, and call that paganism "Christianesque."![]()
Re: Christianity
Yeah like one can tell biblical stories, but not and be right about that. Also charging people money for it is another scam and a con.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:43 pmWell, one can DO it, of course. But not and be right about that.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:34 amWhy not; what's to stop you?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 3:41 am Christianity isn't a flavouring. You can't sprinkle some of it over paganism, and call that paganism "Christianesque."![]()
Obviously telling someone that poking a sharp pencil in one's eye is going to hurt is true, but everyone knows that, and one doesn't need to charge money for that advice, not that people are dumb enough to pay for that advice anyway.
Last edited by Dontaskme on Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Christianity
But the thing about all religion is the thought that they are right. You should know that better than anyone.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:43 pmWell, one can DO it, of course. But not and be right about that.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:34 amWhy not; what's to stop you?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 3:41 am Christianity isn't a flavouring. You can't sprinkle some of it over paganism, and call that paganism "Christianesque."![]()
- Alexis Jacobi
- Posts: 8301
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am
Re: Christianity
Man, the nutjobs are out in force today!
Re: Christianity
It's the nut job's job to crack the champion of all nutters from running the nut house.
- Alexis Jacobi
- Posts: 8301
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am
Re: Christianity
Oh, there it is again. Medics! Administrators! Moderators! Therapists! Gary's threatening suicide again. He's come to the end of his rope and the forum is not helping him much. What to do, what to do!
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Christianity
Where did I threaten suicide? Are you hallucinating?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:51 pm Oh, there it is again. Medics! Administrators! Moderators! Therapists! Gary's threatening suicide again. He's come to the end of his rope and the forum is not helping him much. What to do, what to do!
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27622
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Christianity
Correct.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 1:34 pmIf it is the case that one can only be a Christian by "accepting" Christ as one's "savior" then it also seems true to me that one either accepts Christ as their "savior" or one does not.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 3:41 amChristianity isn't a flavouring. You can't sprinkle some of it over paganism, and call that paganism "Christianesque." It's something one is, or simply is not, depending on whether one fits the Scriptural definition.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sat Jun 24, 2023 4:34 am Catholicism is certainly Christian-esque — because it is a syncretistic adaptation. Have you assimilated nothing of what I’ve written recently?
Then, Acts 4:12 -- "And there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among mankind by which we must be saved."However, what if one accepted more than one as their "savior"?
John 1:1-14. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him not even one thing came into being that has come into being. In Him was life, and the life was the Light of mankind. And the Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not grasp it....And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us; and we saw His glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth."To be clear, I find it difficult to believe that Christ was the creator of the universe.
That is very likely correct, Gary. Apart from the mercy that recognizes those in distress, the poor, the lowly, the widows and so forth as the equals of the rich, powerful and celebrated, we might live in a very survival-of-the-fittest world. And that is a legacy of Christianity, as a matter of historical record. That is also why, in places where Christianity has not been historically influential, infanticide, exploitation, and violence against the weak are common features of life. And it's why most educational institutions, medical missions, prison relief organizations, addiction programs, international aid programs, and other welfare agencies have, or have had at some time in their past, Christian values driving them forward. It's not accidental. There is a relationship....if it were not for Christ (among others), then what I believe to be evil would have a greater hold on the world, and someone who is weak, like me, would have likely perished or perhaps have been put to death at a very early age.
Call that "Christianesque," perhaps...the offshoots or halo-effect of days when Christianity was taken more seriously as an orientation point for social values. And one can also look at such agencies, and see what has progressively happened to them as that mandate has been removed. It's all very telling.
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27622
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Christianity
And what we know, from the basic laws of logic, such as Law of Non-Contradiction, is that they can't all be right. So we should be careful to examine such claims before accepting them, no?Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:47 pmBut the thing about all religion is the thought that they are right. You should know that better than anyone.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:43 pmWell, one can DO it, of course. But not and be right about that.
- Alexis Jacobi
- Posts: 8301
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am
Re: Christianity
OK, very well, but we need a soundtrack!
Come ye nutjobs from the farthest reaches of cyberspace! Come to a philosophy forum and barf it all up here!
Wait? What was the topic here?!? Christianity?
No! Let the mental cases have the floor, sane conversation is a bore!
Re: Christianity
If we turn to the basic laws of logic, we know that none of them are right, but religion is all about feeling you are right, isn't it?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:57 pmAnd what we know, from the basic laws of logic, such as Law of Non-Contradiction, is that they can't all be right.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:47 pmBut the thing about all religion is the thought that they are right. You should know that better than anyone.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:43 pm
Well, one can DO it, of course. But not and be right about that.
I have never come across any religious claim that warrants examination.So we should be careful to examine such claims before accepting them, no?
- Alexis Jacobi
- Posts: 8301
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am
Re: Christianity
And, at this point, I might need it if there is an afterlife because I feel closer than ever to the point of finding the answer to whether or not there is one.