Beyond Postmodernity

[Wizard22]

Quote the full context Sculptor. I said "essentially zero", not zero.

[mickthinks]

Which of these was you matching the standard of quoting the full context you want to set for others, Wizzy?

This?

There are countless articles and sources on Bill Gates' open admission about his Eugenics/Depopulation projects, along with case studies on essentially zero Covid fatalities among children, teenagers, and young adults.

No there is not.

or this?

{...}

along with case studies on essentially zero Covid fatalities among children, teenagers, and young adults.

No there is not.

Your dishonesty is on display for all to see.

[mickthinks]

I said "essentially zero", not zero.

You said

There was literally no danger at all to children.

Find a good English dictionary and check and compare "literally" and "... at all" with what you now find yourself trying to claim you were saying about the level of risk to children.

Your dishonesty is on display for all to see.

[Sculptor]

Quote the full context Sculptor. I said "essentially zero", not zero.

I suggest you fuck off and find out what essentially means

[Wizard22]

Mick and Sculptor, I doubt you actually know the statistical death rates of Covid-19 across the United States or Western Civilization. Turns out, I do. The All-Death-Mortality rate of Covid-19 was 0.5% which means 5 per 1000. Most of these 5 were above Age 50, all of them were above Age 30. Young people literally had no threat of Covid-19 aside from a regular fever or flu season. This is a problem, because there were countless, multiple threats by Western governments against young adults, teenagers, and children, topped off with Biden's threat of a "Winter of severe illness and death of the unvaccinated". This was a complete lie.

You, micky, and you, dumby, both bought into these lies, by western governmental authorites, because you two do not think for yourselves. You're not Independent minded. You cannot Doubt what you are told by your masters.


On top of these lies, they at first claimed that the Covid-19 vaccines were Preventative. They were not.

Then they claimed that Covid-19 would "stop the spread". It did not.

[Wizard22]

Let's reattach these points to the OP.

This absolute blind-faith you hypothetical "Free Thinkers" have in Western authorities...is a big problem. Your responses, reactions, and defenses essentially prove that this problem. You cannot critically think for yourselves, or hold oppositional arguments in your heads. Here's the difference between myself and you. I can be wrong. I can hold views that I don't believe in. I can empathize with my opposition. Neither of you, can. And that essentially means that Philosophy is not the area for you. You belong in politics, or religion. You belong in areas where ideas are rigid, no leeway for change or understanding.

[FlashDangerpants]

Here's the difference between myself and you. I can be wrong.

To cover for the silliness of your (il)literacy thread you pretended to have read Berkeley's Treatise. When asked about it, you cited a mangled version of Locke's causal theory of perception. In the days since you have repeatedly doubled down on the lie even though it would have been only a short term embarassment to admit the lie as soon as you realised it wasn't going to pay off.

You wouldn't put yourself through all that shit if you weren't brutally beholden to the sin of pride. You are clearly incapable of admitting error, and the blatant way you double down suggests that you might not have the capacity to recognise that you have made one at all.

Sculptor and mcthinks have probably both read the treatise. The book is super short, you could have read it in a couple of hours if you skip the multiple prologues.

[Wizard22]

To cover for the silliness of your (il)literacy thread you pretended to have read Berkeley's Treatise. When asked about it, you cited a mangled version of Locke's causal theory of perception. In the days since you have repeatedly doubled down on the lie even though it would have been only a short term embarassment to admit the lie as soon as you realised it wasn't going to pay off.

You wouldn't put yourself through all that shit if you weren't brutally beholden to the sin of pride. You are clearly incapable of admitting error, and the blatant way you double down suggests that you might not have the capacity to recognise that you have made one at all.

Sculptor and mcthinks have probably both read the treatise. The book is super short, you could have read it in a couple of hours if you skip the multiple prologues.

I've had worthy philosophical challenges in my life.

But not from you. Maybe someday, if you actually take Philosophy seriously, could you "prove me wrong". I'll be waiting.

[FlashDangerpants]

Mick and Sculptor, I doubt you actually know the statistical death rates of Covid-19 across the United States or Western Civilization. Turns out, I do. The All-Death-Mortality rate of Covid-19 was 0.5% which means 5 per 1000.

Show your data

And don't forget, as per your literacy thread where you have shown you will not consider any 2nd hand source including such things as professors...

You've shown that you have a bad-habit of using 2nd hand sources, instead of 1st hand.

Please be sure to maintain your own standards while you share the raw data and any calculation tools you used to process it.

[Wizard22]

Mick and Sculptor, I doubt you actually know the statistical death rates of Covid-19 across the United States or Western Civilization. Turns out, I do. The All-Death-Mortality rate of Covid-19 was 0.5% which means 5 per 1000.

Show your data

And don't forget, as per your literacy thread where you have shown you will not consider any 2nd hand source including such things as professors...

You've shown that you have a bad-habit of using 2nd hand sources, instead of 1st hand.

Please be sure to maintain your own standards while you share the raw data and any calculation tools you used to process it.

No.

Tell this forum what you believe the mortality rate was of Covid-19 first.

[FlashDangerpants]

And the vaccines did *NOT* stop nor prevent transmission. So it's more lies.

This empirical claim stands in need of justification, as per your own requirements, this should take the form of first hand data not 2nd hand interpretation. Please furnish.

[Wizard22]

And the vaccines did *NOT* stop nor prevent transmission. So it's more lies.

This empirical claim stands in need of justification, as per your own requirements, this should take the form of first hand data not 2nd hand interpretation. Please furnish.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articl ... ting-covid

The COVID-19 vaccine does not stop a person from contracting SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. However, it can strengthen immunity against the virus and help prevent serious illness, hospitalization, and death. It also helps reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

And it "helps reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 turned out to be false, because there was/is no empirical data nor verification of the claim. This is proved by the contaminated Control Groups during phase 2 trials. Once mixed, the only difference between data is All-death-morality and injury rates between those who are completely unvaccinated, versus those who have different injections and boosters of vaccines.

[FlashDangerpants]

And the vaccines did *NOT* stop nor prevent transmission. So it's more lies.

This empirical claim stands in need of justification, as per your own requirements, this should take the form of first hand data not 2nd hand interpretation. Please furnish.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articl ... ting-covid

The COVID-19 vaccine does not stop a person from contracting SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. However, it can strengthen immunity against the virus and help prevent serious illness, hospitalization, and death. It also helps reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

And it "helps reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 turned out to be false, because there was/is no empirical data nor verification of the claim. This is proved by the contaminated Control Groups during phase 2 trials. Once mixed, the only difference between data is All-death-morality and injury rates between those who are completely unvaccinated, versus those who have different injections and boosters of vaccines.

As a man who considers himself extremely wise once said....

And AGAIN you use a second-hand source! Hahaha!

You just can't learn a lesson, can you??

To avoid hypocrisy, you have to provide both the raw data and the tools you used to analyse it, including whichever algorithms you crafted for the purpose.

[Wizard22]

As a man who considers himself extremely wise once said....

And AGAIN you use a second-hand source! Hahaha!

You just can't learn a lesson, can you??

To avoid hypocrisy, you have to provide both the raw data and the tools you used to analyse it, including whichever algorithms you crafted for the purpose.

You asked for a source. You received one. It proved you're a Dope. So now you have nothing but more Illiteracy, Dopey.

[mickthinks]

Mick and Sculptor, I doubt you actually know the statistical death rates of Covid-19 across the United States or Western Civilization ...

Wizzy, the topic of the Covid-19 pandemic, the politics, the science, the misunderstandings; it's vast. There is a lot to talk about, for sure. Right now you want to talk about death rates and whether I know them. But earlier you wanted to talk about "them" overstating the risk to young children and misleading everyone. Everyone knows why you're trying to bait and switch like this.

It's because you are dishonest.

Mick: You are the only one here who thinks this is news
Wizzy: Sculptor already admitted otherwise.

Yeah, we dealt with that days ago. Sculptor posted a denial of something from which you have invalidly inferred an admission of something else. This might have been an innocent mistake last Sunday but now its repetition is a deliberate falsehood.

Your dishonesty is on display for all to see.