No Humans = no FSK-ed Reality

[Veritas Aequitas]

Here at 54:37
https://youtu.be/ISdBAf-ysI0?t=3268
Professor Jim Al-Khalili stated,
"In some strange sense, it really does suggest the moon doesn't exists when we are not looking. It truly defies common sense."

To repeat my question for VA, ........
What evidence do you have for the astonishingly unscientific claim that no humans = no reality?

I have already explained to you many times.

There are two senses of reality in contention, i.e.

• 1. FSK-ed reality [evolutionary embedded in all humans]
  
  2. P-realist reality independent of the existence of humans.

I have demonstrated your version of reality in 2 is illusory.

PH's Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39992

PH's What is Fact [independent] is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39577

My FSK-ed reality is most realistic.
FSK-ed implied it CANNOT be independent of the existence of humans*.
Therefore if there are no humans, there is no FSK-ed reality.

*other than Peter Holmes, "independent of the existence of humans" is generally accepted without doubt as simply "mind-independent"

[Veritas Aequitas]

Notes: to KIV

[FlashDangerpants]

Finally we get reality-proper

[Harbal]

To repeat my question for VA, ........

What evidence do you have for the astonishingly unscientific claim that no humans = no reality?

I have already explained to you many times.

There are two senses of reality in contention, i.e.

• 1. FSK-ed reality [evolutionary embedded in all humans]
  
  2. P-realist reality independent of the existence of humans.

I have demonstrated your version of reality in 2 is illusory.

PH's Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39992

PH's What is Fact [independent] is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39577

My FSK-ed reality is most realistic.
FSK-ed implied it CANNOT be independent of the existence of humans*.
Therefore if there are no humans, there is no FSK-ed reality.

*other than Peter Holmes, "independent of the existence of humans" is generally accepted without doubt as simply "mind-independent"

I am still unable to work out whether you are bad at philosophy, or just bad at explaining yourself. Probably a bit of both.