WE NEED MORE GUNS..

[Skepdick]

Ah, so do 'you' think or BELIEVE that 'philosophy' is ASKING STUPID QUESTIONS, "skepdick"?

Do you believe that I believe that philosophy is asking stupid questions, Age?

SO, what 'we' have here now is one who is SHOWING and PROVING, IRREFUTABLY, just how Truly INCAPABLE 'it' IS of just being able to back up and support 'its' OWN VIEWS, CLAIMS, and BELIEFS, in ABSOLUTELY ANY way AT ALL.

OK. If that's what you are showing and proving to us then I believe you.

[Age]

What is working, exactly? You are simply annoying people, nothing more.

You are not the first to behave like that, and you won't be the last; you are merely one in a succession of harmless nuisances.

Isn't that the hallmark of a good Philosophy? And if I am succeeding at annoying those whose job is to annoy people that sounds like it's working.

Who watches the watchers?
Who critiques the critics?
Who rebels against the rebels?
Who analyses the analysts?
Who annoys the annoyers?

Thee One and ONLY 'I'.

'I' AM the ONLY One DOING 'these'.

Which, by the way "skepdick", is CERTAINLY NOT 'a policeman'.

[Age]

Do you believe that I believe that philosophy is asking stupid questions, Age?

SO, what 'we' have here now is one who is SHOWING and PROVING, IRREFUTABLY, just how Truly INCAPABLE 'it' IS of just being able to back up and support 'its' OWN VIEWS, CLAIMS, and BELIEFS, in ABSOLUTELY ANY way AT ALL.

OK. If that's what you are showing and proving to us then I believe you.

The ABSOLUTE LACK OF 'maturity' here IS BLINDING.

[Skepdick]

Which, by the way "skepdick", is CERTAINLY NOT 'a policeman'.

So we can add another liar to the list.

[Skepdick]

The ABSOLUTE LACK OF 'maturity' here IS BLINDING.

Lack of maturity is still infinitely better than the level of immaturity displayed by Age.

There's no argument that would convince you that you are wrong about firearm ownreship, so the only valid argument is "Go fuck yourself"

[Dontaskme]

Which, by the way "skepdick", is CERTAINLY NOT 'a policeman'.

On the internet,no one knows your a dog.

Here is Skepdick on/off duty.

[Dontaskme]

And here is Skepdick's kid...a chip off the old block.

[Harbal]

What is working, exactly? You are simply annoying people, nothing more.

You are not the first to behave like that, and you won't be the last; you are merely one in a succession of harmless nuisances.

Isn't that the hallmark of a good Philosophy? And if I am succeeding at annoying those whose job is to annoy people that sounds like it's working.

Who watches the watchers?
Who critiques the critics?
Who rebels against the rebels?
Who analyses the analysts?
Who annoys the annoyers?

I wouldn't call getting on people's nerves any kind of philosophy, let alone good philosophy. If you get a perverse kick simply out of annoying people, then I suppose that's reason enough to do it, but you are kidding yourself to think you are achieving anything beyond that. Besides, it seems to me that you are having a rougher ride than those you are targeting.

[Harbal]

Which, by the way "skepdick", is CERTAINLY NOT 'a policeman'.

So we can add another liar to the list.

You seem to be pretty much on your own, so I don't know what the "we" refers to.

[Harbal]

Which, by the way "skepdick", is CERTAINLY NOT 'a policeman'.

I think the number coming to that conclusion is steadily growing.

[Skepdick]

I wouldn't call getting on people's nerves any kind of philosophy, let alone good philosophy. If you get a perverse kick simply out of annoying people, then I suppose that's reason enough to do it, but you are kidding yourself to think you are achieving anything beyond that. Besides, it seems to me that you are having a rougher ride than those you are targeting.

Draw me a difference between philosophy and "good" philosophy already.

[Skepdick]

Which, by the way "skepdick", is CERTAINLY NOT 'a policeman'.

I think the number coming to that conclusion is steadily growing.

Indeed. The bandwagon of liars is steadily growing.

How much more evidence does one need that philosophy leads one away from truth?

[Harbal]

I wouldn't call getting on people's nerves any kind of philosophy, let alone good philosophy. If you get a perverse kick simply out of annoying people, then I suppose that's reason enough to do it, but you are kidding yourself to think you are achieving anything beyond that. Besides, it seems to me that you are having a rougher ride than those you are targeting.

Draw me a difference between philosophy and "good" philosophy already.

I would, but I'm worried that you might feel threatened at the sight of my pencil, and shoot me.

You are the one who used the term "good philosophy", so you draw the difference.

[Dontaskme]

OK. If that's what you are showing and proving to us then I believe you.

PNF rules.

Establish an open and respectful communication.

Be transparent in order to build trust.

Reframe failure and mistakes as opportunities for learning and growth.

[Skepdick]

I would, but I'm worried that you might feel threatened at the sight of my pencil, and shoot me.

I am most threatened by your ignorance and you are still alive.