WE NEED MORE GUNS..

[Dontaskme]

All I'm saying Skepdick and Henry is if other civilised countries around the globe manage fine to live without arming themselves to the teeth with their own personal lethal weapons, then why can't the USA?

Is the USA a third world country or something? Hasn't the USA evolved to the (calibre) pardon the pun, of all the other unarmed countries who have successfully managed to reach through mutual intelligent human cooperation.. ?

[Skepdick]

All I'm saying Skepdick and Henry is if other civilised countries around the globe manage fine to live without arming themselves to the teeth with their own personal lethal weapons, then why can't the USA?

Is the USA a third world country or something? Hasn't the USA evolved to the (calibre) pardon the pun, of all the other unarmed countries who have successfully managed to reach through mutual intelligent human cooperation.. ?

You can't possibly live in a civilised country if you are so concerned about the guns your civilised neighbour owns.

And you most definitely don't live in a civilised society if you wouldn't trust your civil fellow citizens with a gun.

You should have that hoplophobia checked out.

[Dontaskme]

All I'm saying Skepdick and Henry is if other civilised countries around the globe manage fine to live without arming themselves to the teeth with their own personal lethal weapons, then why can't the USA?

Is the USA a third world country or something? Hasn't the USA evolved to the (calibre) pardon the pun, of all the other unarmed countries who have successfully managed to reach through mutual intelligent human cooperation.. ?

You can't possibly live in a civilised country if you are so concerned about the guns your civilised neighbour owns.

And you most definitely don't live in a civilised society if you wouldn't trust your civil fellow citizens with a gun.

You should have that hoplophobia checked out.

Ok fine, have your guns then, if that makes you feel more protected from the other humans who you have no control over, as to what their actions will do. If that's the world you like to live your best life in, then fine, love your guns, love your life.

[Skepdick]

Ok fine, have your guns then, if that makes you feel more protected from the other humans who you have no control over, as to what their actions will do. If that's the world you like to live your best life in, then fine, love your guns, love your life.

What would I have done without your blessing?

[Dontaskme]

Ok fine, have your guns then, if that makes you feel more protected from the other humans who you have no control over, as to what their actions will do. If that's the world you like to live your best life in, then fine, love your guns, love your life.

What would I have done without your blessing?

You would have carried on living your best life, the same as it ever was, and nothing would have changed, because you like it just the way it is, if you didn't like it just the way it is, then you would change it.

And I will carry on living my life unchanged as an armless harmless person.

[Dontaskme]

You should have that hoplophobia checked out.

And you should have checked out your own irrational fear of losing control of what other human beings decide to do to you without your personal permission and lack of control of ever being able to stop them violating your own will to live your best life by ruining it with their erratic behavior that may result in putting a bullet in your brain.

You Skepdick have an irratioinal fear of having no control over what other people may or may not do to violate your will to live your best life.

A car we generally use to get us from A to B... we do not use a car as a lethal weapon with the intent to kill people.
A knife we generally use to cut our vegetables...we do not use knives as a lethal weapon with the intent to kill people.

So what use is a gun if there is no intent on harming someone? why assume I have a fear of guns and yet not fear cars or knives which my kitchen has plenty?

I suppose guns could be useful for blowing locks off of doors so as to get into a property for a potential robbing spree.

What a stressful way to live though.

[Skepdick]

You should have that hoplophobia checked out.

And you should have checked out your own irrational fear of losing control of what other human beings decide to do to you without your personal permission and lack of control of ever being able to stop them violating your own will to live your best life by ruining it with their erratic behavior that may result in putting a bullet in your brain.

You Skepdick have an irratioinal fear of having no control over what other people may or may not do to violate your will to live your best life.

A car we generally use to get us from A to B... we do not use a car as a lethal weapon with the intent to kill people.
A knife we generally use to cut our vegetables...we do not use knives as a lethal weapon with the intent to kill people.

So what use is a gun if there is no intent on harming someone? why assume I have a fear of guns and yet not fear cars or knives which my kitchen has plenty?

I suppose guns could be useful for blowing locks off of doors so as to get into a property for a potential robbing spree.

What a stressful way to live though.

It's not an assumption. You are fixated on guns.

It's jut a tool, dude. Like everything else humans use.

Just leave your best life and ignore the guns.

[commonsense]

Can you offer any evidence that neither will ever occur in the future?

Can you offer any evidence that either will ever occur in future?

Of course not, but it will be impossible to experience a mishap if HQ has no guns.

[Dontaskme]

You should have that hoplophobia checked out.

And you should have checked out your own irrational fear of losing control of what other human beings decide to do to you without your personal permission and lack of control of ever being able to stop them violating your own will to live your best life by ruining it with their erratic behavior that may result in putting a bullet in your brain.

You Skepdick have an irratioinal fear of having no control over what other people may or may not do to violate your will to live your best life.

A car we generally use to get us from A to B... we do not use a car as a lethal weapon with the intent to kill people.
A knife we generally use to cut our vegetables...we do not use knives as a lethal weapon with the intent to kill people.

So what use is a gun if there is no intent on harming someone? why assume I have a fear of guns and yet not fear cars or knives which my kitchen has plenty?

I suppose guns could be useful for blowing locks off of doors so as to get into a property for a potential robbing spree.

What a stressful way to live though.

It's not an assumption. You are fixated on guns.

It's jut a tool, dude. Like everything else humans use.

Just leave your best life and ignore the guns.

Yes and every mass killing spree in America was because some one went a bit wild with a potato peeler, I know.

[attofishpi]

You don't have the right to own an AR15 here, just as much as I don't have the right to rape your wife there.

It wouldn't make any difference if you did have the right. It seems she is so much in demand that your turn would never come round anyway.

Yes, apparently she is well known to all the cocks within seven blocks, her name is Gretel, she actually made a song some years ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWP_gNy7sRI

No wonder Skeppy is defending his right to own guns!

[Age]

Which part about living longer == being safer confused you so I can explain it to you?

Well, for one thing, I know we can all live longer by not killing each other, that's not too difficult to explain.

But then if we are to live as though we are a threat to each that we have to carry weapons of self-defence, then I guess none of us are as safe as we would like to believe, are we?

Again. Which part confused you.

I have no idea how safe; or unsafe I am.

'you' may well have absolutely NO idea here "skepdick", but I can and WILL inform 'you' that 'you' are LESS 'safe' in a society with MORE 'weapons' than 'you' are in a society with LESS 'weapons', and thus conversely 'you' are MORE 'safe' in a society with LESS 'weapons' than 'you' are in a society with MORE 'weapons'.

AND, if 'you' find ANY of 'this' CONFUSING, then just let us KNOW and we will endeavor to HELP 'you' UNDERSTAND BETTER here, okay?

If I can mitigate more risks than you can means I won’t exit life as early as you.

BUT it has ALREADY BEEN EXPLAINED to 'you' that you can NOT mitigate ALL so-called 'risks', which ACTUALLY MEANS that 'you' COULD so-called 'exit life' BEFORE the "others", OBVIOUSLY.

ALSO, if you think or BELIEVE that OBTAINING MORE weapons, thus CAUSING the PRODUCTION and CREATION of MORE weapons into a society, mitigates MORE 'risks' to 'your' earlier departure, then you are VERY SADLY MISTAKEN. As it is the INTRODUCTION of MORE WEAPONS into a society which CREATES a LESS 'safe' society for EVERY one, OBVIOUSLY.

If none of it makes a difference in your view go live life and skydive without a parachute

And, if NONE of the above makes a difference in your view, then GO OUT and OBTAIN MORE WEAPONS. OBVIOUSLY you STILL BELIEVE that MORE weapons IN a society makes, or makes you feel, 'safer', somehow.

[Age]

Again. Which part confused you.

I have no idea how safe; or unsafe I am.

If I can mitigate more risks than you can means I won’t exit life as early as you.

But the point is, why create the risk in the first place when you don't have to?

We didn’t. The risk (reality) was here when we arrived.

LOL
LOL
LOL

SO, to you, 'you', human beings, are NOT creating ANY 'risk' by INTRODUCING MORE and MORE weapons INTO society, right?

The 'risk' (the so-called 'reality') that a human being WILL BE KILLED by a 'weapon' was ALREADY here, when human beings arrived, correct?

'you' REALLY DO SAY and CLAIM some of the MOST WEIRDEST and STUPIDEST of 'things' here "skepdick". But, as I SAID here earlier, what WILL be SEEN here are some examples of 'confirmation bias' AT WORK, and WHEN Truly ABSURD and WEIRD BELIEFS are 'TRYING TO' be "justified" or "rationalized' what IS SHOWN and PROVED True is that just about ANY 'thing' will be SAID and CLAIM. NO matter how WEIRD or STUPID the SAYING or CLAIM may well be.

As SEEN and PROVED IRREFUTABLY True here ONCE AGAIN, by "skepdick".

LOL 'we' human beings did NOT create the 'risk' ('reality') of being killed by guns BECAUSE that 'risk' ('reality') 'was here' 'when we arrived'. Could 'this' get ANY MORE STUPID and WEIRD?

Now, if you want to CLAIM that I AM MISTAKING or MISUNDERSTAND ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing' here "skepdick", then PLEASE FEEL ABSOLUTELY FEEL FREE to SHOW WHERE AND PROVIDE the ACTUAL TRUTH here.

[Age]

Again. Which part confused you.

I have no idea how safe; or unsafe I am.

If I can mitigate more risks than you can means I won’t exit life as early as you.

You, we, all of us cannot control how or when it is time for any of us to die by the natural force that is not of man's intervention or doing.

However, you, we, all of us, can exercise perfect control over whether or not we kill each other using the very machines and very useful commodities, including all the lethal weapons which we have cleverly crafted with our bare hands. But life for humanity, seems to be mainly, all about the money, in that, how much money can we make, we must strive only to make a profit, and is why money is much more important than people ever will be.

That's the life we are living, we are living to make money, and for nothing else. We could live like all the other animals in nature and have nothing to do with money at all. Animals who do not live for and about money.

Up to here EVERY thing 'you' SAID and CLAIMED "dontaskme" is True and Right, in regards to the days when this is being written, and of which NO one could REFUTE.

But no human being has ever thought about that sort of life have they, rather, they invented money as a way to live a more civilised life than an animal would, which is the most ironic statement ever made, so it turns out.

Here I would just say and mention that ALL 'children' ACTUALLY BEGINS living the life of EVERY other animal, that is; ONLY WANTING what IS NEEDED in Life.

And that it is ONLY adults WHO WANT to live with what is NOT NEEDED, namely 'money' here, which HAS BEEN and IS ACTUALLY PRODUCING and CREATING the DEMISE of humanity, human beings, and even 'the world' that ALL animals NEED to LIVE and THRIVE IN and WITH.

[Age]

Again. Which part confused you.

I have no idea how safe; or unsafe I am.

If I can mitigate more risks than you can means I won’t exit life as early as you.

You, we, all of us cannot control how or when it is time for any of us to die by the natural force that is not of man's intervention or doing.

So you don’t control when you die when you skydive with a parachute?

Ok…

How MANY MORE TIMES are 'you' going to ADD IN 'unrealistic and NEVER even IMPLIED scenarios and situations', and then 'TRY TO' 'argue' from 'your' OWN INTRODUCED FALLACY here "skepdick"?

If and when one's position can NOT STAND on its OWN, like with YOUR position here "skepdick", then that IS a SURE SIGN to RID "one's" 'self' of SUCH position.

[Age]

My shotgun is my property, yes?

Do you want to classify my shotgun as sumthin' other than property? If so, explain your thinkin'.

Other than for the purpose of insuring it, I see no reason to classify it as anything other than a gun.

My gun, yes? My car, yes? My house, yes?

LOL
LOL
LOL

If only you KNEW. IF ONLY 'you' KNEW "henry quirk".

If only we has a generic placeholder for things that belong to me, or you, or anyone.

Possessions? Belongings? I guess those are unnecessary too? Perhaps my and mine ought to go as well?

-----

'you' REALLY DO have a GREAT DEAL to LEARN and UNDERSTAND here "henry quirk".

With Common there is the specter of guilty till proven innocent.

With Harbal it's the specter of Newspeak.