WE NEED MORE GUNS..

[Skepdick]

So it's simple. (and yes it would be stupid of you to provide the graph in an attempt to support your argument)

Such a graph would support no argument whatsoever. All it would tell you is the widespread adoption of a tool within a population

Show where the rates of murder halve where ownership of dangerous weapons increases. DUH!

Yes. DUH!

It's just latency, you see.

Why wait for 20 minutes for the police to show up when you are already at the crime scene?

Indeed since we are talking about guns, provide the graph that shows a reduction in murder rates where a populous has more access to weapons!!

Yeah sure.

Switzerland has higher "gun death" than UK.
Switzerland has lower murder rate than UK.

btw. Guns are > 90% for killing. So Y ban cars, maths, compootation which wern't created JUST for killing. (IDIOT).

POSIWID - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpo ... at_it_does

>90% of guns haven't killed anyone.

99.9999% of the time my guns launch projectiles at high velocity towards paper or steel targets.

[attofishpi]

R U some sort of random crap generator?

[Skepdick]

R U some sort of random crap generator?

Less random and less crappy than you perhaps.

[Harbal]

I can't quite get away from thinking that if people didn't have guns, they couldn't kill each other with them. I know, I'm just being silly.

[attofishpi]

I can't quite get away from thinking that if people didn't have guns, they couldn't kill each other with them. I know, I'm just being silly.

Ya Harbal, we all hear ya mate but I think I need to break it all down..real simple for this kunt.

[Skepdick]

I can't quite get away from thinking that if people didn't have guns, they couldn't kill each other with them. I know, I'm just being silly.

That's a pretty banal tautology.

Obviiously! If people didn't have X they couldn't kill each other with X.

For X in {rocks, swords, bows&arrows, clubs, poisons, fire, cars, piano wires, hammers }

And if you have no tools whatsoever you can always choke; or kick them to death.

It's not like the killing started when guns showed up.

[Dontaskme]

>90% of guns haven't killed anyone.

99.9999% of the time my guns launch projectiles at high velocity towards paper or steel targets.

What's the point in doing that?

Couldn't you just play pin the tail on the donkey?

[Skepdick]

>90% of guns haven't killed anyone.

99.9999% of the time my guns launch projectiles at high velocity towards paper or steel targets.

What's the point in doing that?

Couldn't you just play pin the tail on the donkey?

It's fun.

What's the point of fun, you ask? I don't think I can explain it to you.

[attofishpi]

Please explain in an extremely simple way Y more guns in society increases the murder rate rather than reduces it like I have suggested... (because I am a dipshit)

Ok Skeppy.

There is playground A and playground B. Both playgrounds are for 10 year old kids and they spend a year in their allotted play area.

Which out of playground A or B is likely to have more deaths?

Playground A has no guns. Playground B has every type of gun available to the kids within the playground.

Over the year Skeppy, indeed the years that these playground setups exist, which of A or B is going to have the most murders?

[Skepdick]

Ok Skeppy.

There is playground A and playground B. Both playgrounds are for 10 year old kids and they spend a year in their allotted play area.

Which out of playground A or B is likely to have more deaths?

Playground A has no guns. Playground B has every type of gun available to the kids within the playground.

Over the year Skeppy, indeed the years that these playground setups exist, which of A or B is going to have the most murders?

Your are supper confused about what it is that you are testing for.

Your scenario is testing for accidents, not murders.

10 year olds are not legally capable of committing murder - they lack criminal capacity.

[Harbal]

I can't quite get away from thinking that if people didn't have guns, they couldn't kill each other with them. I know, I'm just being silly.

That's a pretty banal tautology.

Obviiously! If people didn't have X they couldn't kill each other with X.

For X in {rocks, swords, bows&arrows, clubs, poisons, fire, cars, piano wires, hammers }

And if you have no tools whatsoever you can always choke; or kick them to death.

It's not like the killing started when guns showed up.

True, you could kill someone with almost anything, but it's much easier when the thing you are killing with is designed specifically for the job.

[Skepdick]

True, you could kill someone with almost anything, but it's much easier when the thing you are killing with is designed specifically for the job.

Of course! And that ease-of-use is an incredibly useful property for self-defence!

How difficult do you think it should be for my wife to defend herself from three men trying to rape her?

[Harbal]

>90% of guns haven't killed anyone.

99.9999% of the time my guns launch projectiles at high velocity towards paper or steel targets.

What's the point in doing that?

Couldn't you just play pin the tail on the donkey?

[attofishpi]

Ok Skeppy.

There is playground A and playground B. Both playgrounds are for 10 year old kids and they spend a year in their allotted play area.

Which out of playground A or B is likely to have more deaths?

Playground A has no guns. Playground B has every type of gun available to the kids within the playground.

Over the year Skeppy, indeed the years that these playground setups exist, which of A or B is going to have the most murders?

10 year olds are not legally capable of committing murder - they lack criminal capacity.

So make it a playground for 20 year olds dipshit.

[Skepdick]

Ok Skeppy.

There is playground A and playground B. Both playgrounds are for 10 year old kids and they spend a year in their allotted play area.

Which out of playground A or B is likely to have more deaths?

Playground A has no guns. Playground B has every type of gun available to the kids within the playground.

Over the year Skeppy, indeed the years that these playground setups exist, which of A or B is going to have the most murders?

10 year olds are not legally capable of committing murder - they lack criminal capacity.

So make it a playground for 20 year olds dipshit.

Sure, I expect less murder in the one with guns.

I also expect a bunch of the women in the playpen without guns to get gang-raped.

I expect far less gang-rape in the playpen where women are armed.