Gambling

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
RWStanding
Posts: 401
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:23 pm

Gambling

Post by RWStanding »

Society
If we live in a responsible society, and not a free for all. The only question about gambling is whether it is good for society.
If not it should be largely removed.
It is for Society to decide and not an authoritarian government.
But then we appear to be living in a kleptocracy and not a democracy
Extending this to other questions.
We appear to have a society and population answering the ambitions of either commerce, or of the state.
The alternative to those is commerce answering the essential needs of society and natural environment as a holistic concept.
Impenitent
Posts: 5779
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Gambling

Post by Impenitent »

promise free everything for everyone and gamble on your continued existence when it isn't delivered...

-Imp
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Gambling

Post by Iwannaplato »

RWStanding wrote: Thu Apr 27, 2023 8:20 pm Society
If we live in a responsible society, and not a free for all. The only question about gambling is whether it is good for society.
If not it should be largely removed.
It is for Society to decide and not an authoritarian government.
But then we appear to be living in a kleptocracy and not a democracy
Extending this to other questions.
We appear to have a society and population answering the ambitions of either commerce, or of the state.
The alternative to those is commerce answering the essential needs of society and natural environment as a holistic concept.
I want to add a twist on the question. If we look only at gambling, when deciding if allowing gambling is good or bad for society, our focus may well be too narrow. Perhaps gambling has a net negative effect, if we look at direct effects of it. But it may be positive that we are allowed to make what for some is a poor choice. And I'd add, I think it is very hard to evaluate the effects of things, and then also at the more subtle level, the effects of allowing things or not.

And then also, if we try to eliminate gambling, we won't. We will create more criminals. This might be a net gain or not.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1435
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: Gambling

Post by Agent Smith »

If the apple must go, afortiori, the peach must be cut geometrically. Can the doctor figure out how to treat the infection without causing a fatal adverse side effect?
Last edited by Agent Smith on Tue May 02, 2023 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Gambling

Post by Harbal »

RWStanding wrote: Thu Apr 27, 2023 8:20 pm
If we live in a responsible society, and not a free for all. The only question about gambling is whether it is good for society.
I don't see any harm in gambling.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS8isi32WjE
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1435
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: Gambling

Post by Agent Smith »

It's obvious to me at least that when there are enough oranges, we get a lemon! Right :?: :mrgreen:
alan1000
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: Gambling

Post by alan1000 »

Would I be right in assuming that "RWStanding" is short for "right-wing standing"? In which case it's obvious how we deal with the kleptocracy/authoritarian government - MORE GUNS!
Post Reply