Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Apr 15, 2023 4:21 am
Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:32 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 10:54 pm
If any view of what morality is is
true, then it has to be
useful to people in making various moral decisions. Some of these are personal, but some are also familial, social, institutional, national, judicial, policy-producing, and so on. I'm just wondering how your view of morality serves such cases; and if it doesn't, then should we not ask, is it an adequate view of morality?
My view of morality influences my conduct, and that is all I am entitled to require of it.
Fair enough for you, of course. But not useful to anybody else, apparently.
It seems obvious that a person's morality is mainly conditioned by the culture he is born and raised in, so others don't have to rely on me to give them their moral values, they acquire them from their cultural environment.
Your approach doesn't offer any wisdom for deciding policy, or shaping a social ethos, or managing the laws of a nation, or structuring a penal code, or managing the ethics of a technology, or preserving rights, or any of the other essential social functions morality is supposed to serve.
I don't have an approach.
I assume, therefore, that you also can't recommend it to anyone. There is, apparently, no particular reason to do so. It doesn't offer anybody any moral guidance. It just says, "X is what Harbal uses to shape his conduct, but there's no special reason you should use X at all."
Okay, if you are going to assume that about me, I will also assume it about you.