Harbal wrote: ↑Mon Apr 10, 2023 1:27 pmWhy would anyone care what this Evola character thinks, unless he were incapable of doing his own thinking? You don't seem to have a single view not borrowed from some obscure writer.
It’s not a bad question really. Why would anyone become interested in either Guénon or Evola?
My first essay at an answer would be along the lines of when someone — a given person — realizes that they ‘stand among ruins’. If I had to somewhat ruthlessly present an individual or individuals in a ruined state (who yet invest in it, and justify it), choosing you or Gary as exemplars would not be unproductive. (However, we are all in similar boats and it is a question of degree).
Let us suppose that one did honestly understand that one was in a ruined state. What then? How would one, how could one, rebuild oneself? According to what value and ideal?
But in your case, Harbal, similar to Gary: you will go to your grave exactly as you are! You have no Higher Ideal.
It’s that simple really.
How did this come about?!?
There, there is also a valid question.
So here I would insert some poignant quotes.
“Nothing is more evident than that modern capitalism is just as subversive as Marxism. The materialistic view of life on which both systems are based is identical; both of their ideals are qualitatively identical, including the premises connected to a world the centre of which is constituted of technology, science, production, "productivity," and "consumption." And as long as we only talk about economic classes, profit, salaries, and production, and as long as we believe that real human progress is determined by a particular system of distribution of wealth and goods, and that, generally speaking, human progress is measured by the degree of wealth or indigence—then we are not even close to what is essential...”
“Contrary to what the bourgeois and liberal polemics claim, the warrior idea may not be reduced to materialism, nor is it synonymous with the exaltation of the brutal use of strength and destructive violence. Rather, the calm, conscious, and planned development of the inner being and a code of ethics; love of distance; hierarchy; order; the faculty of subordinating the emotional and individualistic element of one’s self to higher goals and principles, especially in the name of honor and duty – these are the elements of the warrior idea, and they act as the foundations of a specific “style” that has largely been lost.”
“The occult war is a battle that is waged imperceptibly by the forces of global subversion, with means and in circumstances ignored by current historiography. The notion of occult war belongs to a three-dimensional view of history: this viewdoes not regard as essential the two superficial dimensions of time and space (which include causes, facts, and visible leaders) but rather emphasizes the dimension of depth, or the "subterranean" dimension in which forces and influences often act in a decisive manner, and which, more often not than not, cannot be reduced to what is merely human, whether at an individual or a collective level”