A FSK-Conditioned Fact as a Composite State-of-Affairs

[Veritas Aequitas]

I had complained Peter Holmes [PH] always 'strawman' my points with reference to 'what is fact' i.e. objective moral facts.

The problem is when I mentioned 'fact' it is always a FSK-Conditioned Fact [a composite state-of-affairs], but PH are so blinded he always interpret my 'fact' as his independent fact-in-itself.

Here is my explanation why PH always fall back to his ideological Fact-in-itself, i.e. a feature of reality that is independent of the individual's opinion, beliefs and judgment.

A subject is a kind of a priori FSK state of affairs, an object [thing] is another type of a priori FSK state of affairs.

A FSK-Conditioned Fact is a State-of-Affairs of realization that encompasses the 'subject' and the 'object' together, entangled, enacted and embodied.

As such, a FSK-Conditioned Fact is a composite state-of-affairs comprising both state of affairs of object entangled with state of affairs of subject which culminated in a state of realization of its reality.

It is only upon this realization of the composite FSK-Conditioned Fact that the subject knows via its intellect plus Concepts [in a Schema] the FSK-Conditioned Fact and therefrom describes it.

As I had stated before, the FSK-Conditioned Fact relates to three phases,
1. Entanglement, enactment, embodiment & realization
2. Knowing
3. Describing

So the difference between my FSK-Conditioned Fact is,
PH's fact as state of affairs [feature of reality, that is the case] is merely confined to the state of affairs of the object or external things,

on the other hand, my FSK-Conditioned Fact state-of-affair comprised both the state of affair of the subject plus the state of affair of the object in entanglement with each other as one composite state of affair.

A FSK-Conditioned Fact is a composite state-of-affairs comprising both state of affairs of an object entangled and enacted with state of affairs of a subject which culminated in a state of realization of its reality and subsequently known by a knower.

[Flannel Jesus]

How do you pronounce FSK? Do you say each letter independently, eff ess kay? Or is it pronounced like "Fisk"?

[Veritas Aequitas]

How do you pronounce FSK? Do you say each letter independently, eff ess kay? Or is it pronounced like "Fisk"?

It is an abbreviation for my Framework and System of Knowledge [FSK].
Verbally it is F - S - K, eff ess kay.
If need to pronounce it, "FiSK" sounds good.

[Flannel Jesus]

I asked because I assumed it was eff ESS Kay, each letter spelled out, but then you said "a FSK" multiple times up there, instead of "an FSK", so I started thinking, "does he say Fisk?"