Give him your address so he can post you a bible.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:29 pmOkay, but while we're waiting for the evolutionists, how about you produce the details of how God did it?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:07 pm
If I'm right, I'm right. If I'm wrong, then Evolutionists should be able to produce the number and sorts of transitional human fossils their theory would make us expect.
That they can't, means...what?
Christianity
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
- iambiguous
- Posts: 11317
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:23 pm
Re: Christianity
"GenesisHarbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:29 pmOkay, but while we're waiting for the evolutionists, how about you produce the details of how God did it?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:07 pm
If I'm right, I'm right. If I'm wrong, then Evolutionists should be able to produce the number and sorts of transitional human fossils their theory would make us expect.
That they can't, means...what?
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."
And so on.
As for the details of how He did it? Two words: "mysterious ways".
More to the point, IC will argue that God must have created Earth because it says so in the Bible. And that must be true because the Bible is the word of God.
Unless, of course, you can persuade him to post the most definitive proof that the Christian God does in fact reside in Heaven from one of his videos. Beyond a leap of faith in other words.
YouTube and God, right?
Re: Christianity
I already have a copy, fishy. Not the King James, the Dawkins version.
Re: Christianity
I think God really said, "Let there be evolution".iambiguous wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:55 pm
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."[/size][/b]
And there was evolution. And God saw that it was good, eventually, as it took rather longer than he anticipated.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
Re: Christianity
And evolution is just biology, so he probably knows more about the subject than an evangelist.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
Absolutely. But he really is wanker that would spend his time ONLY with retard US evangelists (because they are so easy to prove as idiots thus ALL Christians must be so fucking stoopid)
Why didn't he confront physicists that are theist? Mmm, I wonder Y?
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27608
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Christianity
Are we "waiting"? Then we should at least "wait" long enough for them to fashion an answer to the problem, should we not? It would seem to me unfair not to grant them any space to reply, and then to persist as if they had failed to do that which they merely lacked opportunity and time to do.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:29 pmOkay, but while we're waiting for the evolutionists, how about you produce the details of how God did it?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:07 pm
If I'm right, I'm right. If I'm wrong, then Evolutionists should be able to produce the number and sorts of transitional human fossils their theory would make us expect.
That they can't, means...what?
So I'm fine with continuing...so long as they have the time they need, as well. And if they think they DO have an answer, perhaps they can offer it.
Re: Christianity
Well I'm not.
Re: Christianity
I don't know, fishy, but I'm not here to represent or defend Dawkins.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:22 pmAbsolutely. But he really is wanker that would spend his time ONLY with retard US evangelists (because they are so easy to prove as idiots thus ALL Christians must be so fucking stoopid)
Why didn't he confront physicists that are theist? Mmm, I wonder Y?![]()
- Alexis Jacobi
- Posts: 8301
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am
Re: Christianity
If you are not doing that -- what are you doing?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:17 pmI wasn't doing that.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 8:53 pm You know that there are problems in evolutionary theory. But that is not a sufficient base on which to rebuild a Christian creationist mythology that matches your Genesis picture.
Immanuel, there certainly was a 'creation' but I think the entire question is how it is explained. You know enough of science to know how physicists describe it. There was some sort of event and everything that we see around us took form. From what? What is the *stuff* from which it is all made? Does anyone have an idea? I am not convinced they do. So their explanation (let's say through mathematical terms and formulas and hypotheses) are 'descriptions' of something that in my own view is unfathomable. How can existence exist? Is it even possible to refer to a time before?
I believe that what you wish to assert, and I cannot but agree with you, is that this cannot be a random event and it presupposes something that brought all things into existence. You are attracted to or comfortable with the view that the Hebrew god shazammed it in some way similar to the creation story. But here is the thing: you never do offer any sort of picture of how the creation took place. Where it gets strange is that you make a reference to extremely complex ecological-symbiotic relationships that are hard to explain in evolutionary lingo, and you know that I cannot fathom how the archerfish became such a wonderful spitter without there being some intermediate half-spitting form. We see extreme adaptability and forms of it so worked out that it is impossible to imagine how they could have evolved through random trial and error. You point out that there are gaps --but you do not ever offer a coherent image of how god created all of this. You seem to imply that god created it and made it in such a way that it looks like everything evolved from primitive forms to complex forms. But why? Why would god do this?
I think that the real miracle is not seen because language and story obscures it. The real unbelievable fact is that all of this does exist. And there is no alternative to that existence. And even in the Christian picture the afterworld of Heaven cannot ever cease to exist unless the crator-god decides to bring even that to an end through annihilation. And then what comes next?
AJ: The ‘purpose’ of life, moral and spiritual questions, these can be discerned as instilled within the creation itself (in conscious beings) without resorting to mythical fabulations.
What you hope to achieve is that people here will agree and say *by a god* *by a creator* *by a divine intelligence* who also rules and watches over the creation in a way similar to the Christian story.Immanuel "Instilled"? By what?
But there is a point where explanation simply fails. I am not a classic atheist but I can see no way that it is possible to *explain creation*.
I'd like to hear your version.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
Well it's obvious. They would have presented him with counter arguments that would leave him without any grounds to stand on. Sure, I doubt they'd convince him to have any faith beyond his faith in there being no God, but he could never walk away and write a smug arrogant book about how deluded THEY are.Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:51 pmI don't know, fishy, but I'm not here to represent or defend Dawkins.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:22 pmAbsolutely. But he really is wanker that would spend his time ONLY with retard US evangelists (because they are so easy to prove as idiots thus ALL Christians must be so fucking stoopid)
Why didn't he confront physicists that are theist? Mmm, I wonder Y?![]()
- iambiguous
- Posts: 11317
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:23 pm
Re: Christianity
Sure, given the gap between what you and I and others here think about all of this and all that there is to be known about the existence of existence itself, lots and lots of things are possible. On the other hand, given that nature itself [including us] is nothing short of a grim, gruesome, ghastly bloodbath...a slaughterhouse...what does that tell us about God's idea of evolution?Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:04 pmI think God really said, "Let there be evolution".iambiguous wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:55 pm
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."[/size][/b]
And there was evolution. And God saw that it was good, eventually, as it took rather longer than he anticipated.![]()
In fact, the only way the faithful here can reconcile it with a "loving, just and merciful God" is in embracing Harold Kushner's narrative or in just accepting His mysterious ways.
Then when the evolutionists point out there is nothing in the Bible about the dinosaurs [on the Ark for example], the creationists claim that God planted fake dinosaur bones in the Earth in order to test our faith.
There's practically nothing the flocks of sheep won't believe in order to keep oblivion at bay. Though, admittedly, I'd believe it too if I could.
- iambiguous
- Posts: 11317
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:23 pm
Re: Christianity
Yo, AJ!
I'm not in your penalty box, am I?
I'm not in your penalty box, am I?
Re: Christianity
Dawkins is a main stream scientist who, I believe, has specialised in evolution, and what he has to say on the subject carries weight. As for his anti-religion campaigning, that is something else. He's just evangelising from the other side of the road, and I find him a bit irritating in that respect. Why people have to stand on soap boxes to try and convince each other of the existence, or non-existance, of God is beyond me.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 01, 2023 11:02 pm Well it's obvious. They would have presented him with counter arguments that would leave him without any grounds to stand on. Sure, I doubt they'd convince him to have any faith beyond his faith in there being no God, but he could never walk away and write a smug arrogant book about how deluded THEY are.
![]()
I have a fondness for truth, so I look to science, rather than religion, to satisfy my curiosity. You know I don't believe in God, but I don't actually care whether he exists or not, and I don't really understand why people make such a big deal about it.