Mysticism vs. Mathematics

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Impenitent
Posts: 5774
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Mysticism vs. Mathematics

Post by Impenitent »

3 is a magic number

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FI2tTNjrUI

"Three is a magic number.
Yes it is, it's a magic number.
Somewhere in the ancient, mystic trinity
You get three as a magic number.
The past and the present and the future,
Faith and hope and charity,
The heart and the brain and the body
Give you three.
That's a magic number.

It takes three legs to make a tri-pod or to make a table stand.
It takes three wheels to make a ve-hicle called a tricycle.
Every triangle has three corners,
Every triangle has three sides,
No more, no less.
You don't have to guess.
When it's three you can see it's a magic number.

A man and a woman had a little baby.
Yes, they did.
They had three in the family.
That's a magic number.

3, 6, 9... 12, 15, 18... 21, 24, 27... 30.
3, 6, 9... 12, 15, 18... 21, 24, 27... 30.

Three time ten is... >> 30
Three times nine is... >> 27
Three times eight is... >> 24
Three times seven is... >> 21
Three times six is 18, three times five is 15
Three times four is twelve
And three times three is nine and three times two is six.
And three times one is three of course.

3, 6, 9.
12, 15, 18.
21, 24, 27... 30.

Three times ten is... 30
Three times nine is 27
Three times eight is... 24
Three times seven is... 21
Three times six is 18, three times five is 15,
Three times four is twelve
And three times three is nine and three times two is six.
And three times one...

That's a magic number.

A man and a woman had a little baby.
Yes, they did.
They had three in the family.
That's a magic number."

great way to learn multiplication ...

-Imp
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Mysticism vs. Mathematics

Post by Walker »

12000 may not be magical, but such symmetry only happens once.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: Mysticism vs. Mathematics

Post by Skepdick »

wtf wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 8:56 pm Integers are real numbers.
So... this is not true.

Liebnitz's rule states "For any x and y, if x is identiical to y, then x and y have all the same properties.
Formally: ∀x∀y(x=y → ∀F(Fx= Fy))

But the integer 3 doesn't have the same properties as the real number 3. SUCC(3:ℕ) != SUCC(3:ℝ) is a trivial counter-example to 3:ℕ = 3:ℝ

The reason your interactions with me are always so "unpleasant" is because I always have to drill it into your head that just because you've studied Mathematics doesn't preclude you from being the indiot in the conversation.
Post Reply