Christianity

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

seeds
Posts: 2880
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:31 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by seeds »

Lacewing wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 2:58 am
Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 2:36 am rather than "threaten" people with Hell, or "scare" them, isn't it better to offer people hope of eternal life? And if one, like a Christian, actually believes in that, wouldn't it be an act of singular cruelty and unkindness not to mention it?
So, you're being 'kind' by spreading toxic nonsense because of what you believe. :lol:
Wow! There is such an amazingly large (and stinking) gorilla hidden in Mr. Con's statement.

I have raised this issue before,...

...in that the profound irony implicit in Mr. Con's assertion is that by telling someone about Christianity's offer of eternal life under the strict condition that one accepts Jesus as one's personal savior, if they reject the offer for whatever reason,...

(born and indoctrinated into a different religion, for example, or lived and died as a member of some remote jungle tribe who some Christian missionary tried to convert [before they ate him] as another example)

...they are now condemned to the "singular cruelty and unkindness" of experiencing an eternity of torture in Hell.

And the Irony is that if they were simply never made aware of Christianity in the first place, then any "reasonable" God would not punish them for not performing some mandatory Christian ritual that they knew nothing about.

No, any "reasonable" God would do precisely what Mr. Con once suggested in this one lucid and rational statement he made to me years ago...
"God may deal with them in many gracious ways...ways we do not presently know or understand. That is their story, not ours. What we know is that He is loving; and so I trust He will do what is right in all cases."
Again, the irony is, that if not accepting Jesus as one's personal savior is one's ticket to eternal torture, then Mr. Con needs to stop telling people about Christianity in order to stop putting them in such horrifying jeopardy.

In other words, contrary to what Mr. Con said in the quote at the top of this post, it is an act of singular cruelty and unkindness to make people aware of Christianity's offer of salvation.

And that's because, as some Christians like to point out, you no longer have the excuse of not knowing about it. In which case, if you reject it, it was "your choice" to burn in Hell for eternity.

Ridiculous!!!
_______
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by Harbal »

Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:02 pm People, once they've experienced life, want more of it. And they want better. And if I think they can have it, why wouldn't I tell them they can, and tell them as well how I think they can?
I can only give you my opinion why you shouldn't. You don't know it is true. No matter how much you might believe it is, you don't know. Also, when you tell them how they can get the thing you describe as better, you would be trying to influence the way they live their lives, and I think that is a moral responsibility that you do not have the right to take upon yourself. I don't believe in God, and do not believe in a devine authority, so I obviously couldn't accept that as justification.
But if something is sad, then it is certainly good incentive to want something better, some alternative. Nihilistic resignation is a very poor option. And in any case, if the Nihilist were right, why not even delude yourself? If it makes a person happy, even if one were to become idiotically happy, why would the Nihilist speak against that option? For him, nothing matters anyway...not even truth.
You're at it again, with "nihilist". :( I can only speak with any authority about myself: I don't believe in God, I don't believe in an afterlife, I don't think that life has any meaning, and yet none of that makes me sad. Neither does it make me think that nothing matters, because a great many things matter to me, and the truth is one of the things that matters most to me. I am sure that I am not unique in my attitude; there must be plenty like me.
It implies that, for some reason, people just can't or don't want to live without these things, even though their personal beliefs may assure them they're all bunk! :shock: That's a startling fact, and needs some explanation: why would we, mere chance products of an indifferent universe, come to have a desperate longing for things that have absolutely no reality behind them? In fact, from what sort of inducement would such an urge even first emerge?
I don't know; I am not an authority on human psychology, except to say that it can be very weird in all sorts of ways.
It sounds quite weird and maladaptive, if one thinks about it from, say, a Materialist or Evolutionary theory of things. Why would materials or chance and time induce people to want so passionately and universally things that have no prospect of fulfillment, and no reality in existence at all? :shock:
Perhaps natural selection anticipated that you might find those characteristics useful for making an argument in favour of God putting them there. :roll:
A hammer can be used for doing things like, say, opening a tin of beans. But it works very badly at that. When a hammer becomes an elegant tool is when one is, say, a cooper making a barrel, or an iron worker shaping iron. Then, the hammer really sings. It's an instrument that has found its right use, its right place, and is doing what it was designed to do.

And I wonder if human beings aren't very much like that. When they find their right use, they start to sing. There's nothing so wonderful as watching a high-calibre athlete float through a defense and score effortlessly, or a talented musician take those high notes to soaring heights, or watching a skilled negotiator navigate a tough negotiation into a solution that results in everybody slapping each other on the back and shaking hands...these things are elegant and beautiful.

And I think that the reason so many people are unhappy is maybe that they've never found their right use. They've never felt what it is to be in the moment and say, "I was born to be here; this is what I do, and what I was made for." That's an astonishing and delightful thing, if you have ever had such a moment. And what if many, many more such moments were possible; and not just moments, but an ongoing feeling of being exactly at the right place, at the right time, and being perfectly swimming in one's element? How could that sort of thing be anything less than delightful?

So maybe we do have a stake -- a real stake -- in seeing God's design purposes in us fulfilled. Maybe when He wins, we win.
What a stirring speech, IC, I feel positively guilty for not being moved by it. :(
IC wrote:
Harbal wrote:And many people do fill their lives with purpose, or seem to. If God can grant purpose, then purposes must be capable of being granted, in which case why can't we grant them to ourselves?
Well, because we're not God. We are not our own designer, and cannot make ourselves into what we were not designed to be, without causing ourselves suffering as a result. And we don't have control of our own situation, so we find that even the errant purposes we design for ourselves are uncommonly hard to achieve. So we end up frustrated and bitter, because life hasn't delivered to us what we demanded of it...it wouldn't let us "grant ourselves" what we thought we wanted.
Well, as you know, I don't believe in God, so I think the things that you look to God for, we should really be looking to ourselves for. Things like purpose and morality, etc. I know you have given me numerous argument as to why that view is untenable, yet I still hold it as firmly as ever.
However, sharing of well-considered insights, I find quite pleasing. And the sharing of good news is a wonderful thing to do.
Okay, but just be mindful of making promises that are beyond your power to keep. :wink:
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Harbal wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:31 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:02 pm People, once they've experienced life, want more of it. And they want better. And if I think they can have it, why wouldn't I tell them they can, and tell them as well how I think they can?
I can only give you my opinion why you shouldn't. You don't know it is true. No matter how much you might believe it is, you don't know.
It depends on what you mean by "know." As I said, there's not one thing in the empirical world that we human beings "know" in an absolute sense. As Descartes argued, it's even possible to doubt the existence of your own body.

So what we need, if we're reasonable folks, is a threshold of certainty that his high but not absolute. Because absolute knowledge belongs only to God. So we might ask, what would "high enough" knowledge look like to you?
Also, when you tell them how they can get the thing you describe as better, you would be trying to influence the way they live their lives,
Of course. Don't you also want the world to be better?
But if something is sad, then it is certainly good incentive to want something better, some alternative. Nihilistic resignation is a very poor option. And in any case, if the Nihilist were right, why not even delude yourself? If it makes a person happy, even if one were to become idiotically happy, why would the Nihilist speak against that option? For him, nothing matters anyway...not even truth.
You're at it again, with "nihilist".
"At it"? I wasn't accusing you, at all. Please don't misunderstand that: I was just saying that there's limits on how cynical anybody can reasonably be. And the extreme is untenable and unliveable. So we have to be circumspect about how far we want to go down that road.

Criticism is good; cynicism is tragic.
...a great many things matter to me, and the truth is one of the things that matters most to me. I am sure that I am not unique in my attitude; there must be plenty like me.
I'm sure. But that was my question: how come we do that, if ultimately, nothing really DOES matter (since all things end in heat-death anyway), and why do we prefer truth when cheerful illusions are not, in an empirical sense, "worse" than truths, and in a sociological sense may well even seem far better to us?

But we do want truth. And we do all want meaning. And we want things to matter. Why do we want things we also sometimes tell ourselves, by our basic ideology, that surely we cannot have?
It implies that, for some reason, people just can't or don't want to live without these things, even though their personal beliefs may assure them they're all bunk! :shock: That's a startling fact, and needs some explanation: why would we, mere chance products of an indifferent universe, come to have a desperate longing for things that have absolutely no reality behind them? In fact, from what sort of inducement would such an urge even first emerge?
I don't know; I am not an authority on human psychology, except to say that it can be very weird in all sorts of ways.
That's for certain. But it all has to come from somewhere or something, so we could use an explanation, if one's available.

It's a great question: how could all of this have gotten started?
A hammer can be used for doing things like, say, opening a tin of beans. But it works very badly at that. When a hammer becomes an elegant tool is when one is, say, a cooper making a barrel, or an iron worker shaping iron. Then, the hammer really sings. It's an instrument that has found its right use, its right place, and is doing what it was designed to do.

And I wonder if human beings aren't very much like that. When they find their right use, they start to sing. There's nothing so wonderful as watching a high-calibre athlete float through a defense and score effortlessly, or a talented musician take those high notes to soaring heights, or watching a skilled negotiator navigate a tough negotiation into a solution that results in everybody slapping each other on the back and shaking hands...these things are elegant and beautiful.

And I think that the reason so many people are unhappy is maybe that they've never found their right use. They've never felt what it is to be in the moment and say, "I was born to be here; this is what I do, and what I was made for." That's an astonishing and delightful thing, if you have ever had such a moment. And what if many, many more such moments were possible; and not just moments, but an ongoing feeling of being exactly at the right place, at the right time, and being perfectly swimming in one's element? How could that sort of thing be anything less than delightful?

So maybe we do have a stake -- a real stake -- in seeing God's design purposes in us fulfilled. Maybe when He wins, we win.
What a stirring speech, IC, I feel positively guilty for not being moved by it. :(
:D I was just illustrating.

I hope you have had moments in life like that. Hopefully, many. And if you have, you know they're the absolute best.
Well, as you know, I don't believe in God,...

Yep.
...so I think the things that you look to God for, we should really be looking to ourselves for.

The problem is that we, ourselves, are not adequate to that. I can't even grant myself life, in the first place. I can't guarantee my health. I can't forestall my death. I can't even arrange my circumstances, for the most part: I can't arrange my height, weight, basic aptitudes, basic propensities, the place of my birth and the culture into which I arrived, I can't control any of what other people do...

For somebody to whom I might look for things like meaning, truth and morality, I'm wholly an inadequate candidate. I simply don't have control of things anywhere near to the degree I need to in order to secure those things to myself.
I know you have given me numerous argument as to why that view is untenable, yet I still hold it as firmly as ever.
Okay, fair enough.
However, sharing of well-considered insights, I find quite pleasing. And the sharing of good news is a wonderful thing to do.
Okay, but just be mindful of making promises that are beyond your power to keep. :wink:
I don't. I don't promise anything from myself. But then, I don't believe the answers come from me. You might know that from my moniker. :wink:
Gary Childress
Posts: 11747
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Christianity

Post by Gary Childress »

Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:04 pm
However, sharing of well-considered insights, I find quite pleasing. And the sharing of good news is a wonderful thing to do.
Okay, but just be mindful of making promises that are beyond your power to keep. :wink:
I don't. I don't promise anything from myself. But then, I don't believe the answers come from me. You might know that from my moniker. :wink:
What "good news"? Jesus died about two thousand years ago. That and a little over 2,000 will pay for my yearly car insurance. Never mind the price of the gas. Now what?
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:32 pm What "good news"?
How about this?

You're not alone.
Life is hard, but it's not the end of everything. There's hope.
God doesn't hate you.
God wants you to know Him, and with that,...
There are better things ahead.

What wouldn't be "good" about that?
Jesus died almost two thousand years ago.
He had to be born at some time, didn't He?

And whenever he was, the people on one side or the other would naturally wonder what it meant for them. So it's a natural question to ask.

It doesn't imply there's not an answer, though.
Gary Childress
Posts: 11747
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Christianity

Post by Gary Childress »

Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:45 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:32 pm What "good news"?
How about this?

You're not alone.
Life is hard, but it's not the end of everything. There's hope.
God doesn't hate you.
God wants you to know Him, and with that,...
There are better things ahead.

What wouldn't be "good" about that?
All of those things may be equally true without a God or with an indifferent God. So what's the "good news"? What does the Christian God bring to the table that makes him or her worthy of worship--wrath and thunderbolts?
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:07 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:45 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:32 pm What "good news"?
How about this?

You're not alone.
Life is hard, but it's not the end of everything. There's hope.
God doesn't hate you.
God wants you to know Him, and with that,...
There are better things ahead.

What wouldn't be "good" about that?
All of those things may be equally true without a God
Not a chance.

If there's no God, then you're on your own. There's no plan or purpose to things, nothing and nobody to "know," and no prospect of an "ahead." Then what "hope" is there?
What does the Christian God bring to the table that makes him or her worthy of worship
Well, being the Supreme Being, the only true God and the original Source of life, light, truth, health, happiness and everything good would be a pretty good claim to that. If you know anybody who has a better claim, or one even comparable, then tell me about that.

But if you mean, "What has He done for me," then you could maybe see John 3:16. That's also a pretty darn good claim to at least our respect and gratitude, if you don't like the word "worship."
Gary Childress
Posts: 11747
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Christianity

Post by Gary Childress »

Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:19 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:07 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:45 pm
How about this?

You're not alone.
Life is hard, but it's not the end of everything. There's hope.
God doesn't hate you.
God wants you to know Him, and with that,...
There are better things ahead.

What wouldn't be "good" about that?
All of those things may be equally true without a God
Not a chance.

If there's no God, then you're on your own. There's no plan or purpose to things, nothing and nobody to "know," and no prospect of an "ahead."
Why do you say that? Let's not even suppose a possibility of order arising on it's own, which very well could be the case with what little we understand about reality and universes. But what if God created everything at the start bur really doesn't give a shit how we have sex or with whom? What if God is completely indifferent to what happens to us once we were created? Which of those things above would necessarily be different under such a God?


What does the Christian God bring to the table that makes him or her worthy of worship
Well, being the Supreme Being, the only true God and the original Source of life, light, truth, health, happiness and everything good would be a pretty good claim to that. If you know anybody who has a better claim, or one even comparable, then tell me about that.

But if you mean, "What has He done for me," then you could maybe see John 3:16. That's also a pretty darn good claim to at least our respect and gratitude, if you don't like the word "worship."
Yeah, if I reach a point where I can't afford to pay my insurance, I'll be sure let them know Jesus died for their sins. I'm sure that'll help matters. Obviously it worked for all the homeless people on the streets.
Gary Childress
Posts: 11747
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Christianity

Post by Gary Childress »

Don't get me wrong. I'd be tickled pink if there were an all loving god presiding over the world, I just don't see any evidence of it.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:34 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:19 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:07 pm

All of those things may be equally true without a God
Not a chance.

If there's no God, then you're on your own. There's no plan or purpose to things, nothing and nobody to "know," and no prospect of an "ahead."
Why do you say that?
It's inevitable.
What if God is completely indifferent to what happens to us once we were created?
Then his existence would be real, but for us, no longer particularly relevant. And we'd be in exactly the same situation as the above, but this time with God's back turned to us.
Yeah, if I reach a point where I can't afford to pay my insurance, I'll be sure let them know Jesus died for their sins. I'm sure that'll help matters. Obviously it worked for all the homeless people on the streets.
I'm not sure what the point is there, Gary. Sorry...I'm not seeing it.

Maybe you want to clarify?
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Walker »

Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:19 pm If there's no God, then you're on your own. There's no plan or purpose to things, nothing and nobody to "know," and no prospect of an "ahead." Then what "hope" is there?
Dattaswami said much the same thing, although I couldn't tell you where. He framed it in terms of morality, as you have done, although I couldn't tell you where that was, either. I just remember it.

No God, no basis for morality.

A conceptual ideal can be a basis for morality, but then again, a conceptual ideal must also have a basis.

If ordering religions into Venn diagrams, there's going to be some overlap.
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by Harbal »

Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:43 pm Don't get me wrong. I'd be tickled pink if there were an all loving god presiding over the world, I just don't see any evidence of it.
What difference does it make, Gary? God exists or he doesn't, but knowing which is the case isn't going to change how the world is.
Gary Childress
Posts: 11747
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Christianity

Post by Gary Childress »

Harbal wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 10:51 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:43 pm Don't get me wrong. I'd be tickled pink if there were an all loving god presiding over the world, I just don't see any evidence of it.
What difference does it make, Gary? God exists or he doesn't, but knowing which is the case isn't going to change how the world is.
The difference would be that if there was a loving god then there wouldn't be great suffering in the world like there has been and is now. However, since there is great suffering in the world I posed it as a hypothetical, not as actuality.
Gary Childress
Posts: 11747
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Christianity

Post by Gary Childress »

Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 10:05 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:34 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:19 pm
Not a chance.

If there's no God, then you're on your own. There's no plan or purpose to things, nothing and nobody to "know," and no prospect of an "ahead."
Why do you say that?
It's inevitable.
I'm not seeing any inevitability.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Gary Childress wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 11:03 pm The difference would be that if there was a loving god then there wouldn't be great suffering in the world like there has been and is now.
Why do you think that, Gary? Help me understand why you think that follows.
Post Reply