smoking law abuse

Tell us a little about yourself.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by Arising_uk »

John wrote:You do know he's almost certainly a bot?
I agree and I think it's what I'm beginning to think of as 'trojan bots', i.e. they are leaders for the actual spam yet to come.

Although I will apologise if proved wrong.
duszek
Posts: 2342
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:27 pm
Location: Thin Air

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by duszek »

Mr. Arising

If this tax-man you mention were not just a "pen-pusher" but also a doctor he would know how difficult it is to say what causes what in a human body. There are multiple reasons too.
The human body is still a big enigma for modern medicine, even if they pretend otherwise.
User avatar
John
Posts: 738
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:05 pm
Location: Near Glasgow, Scotland

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by John »

Arising_uk wrote:
John wrote:You do know he's almost certainly a bot?
I agree and I think it's what I'm beginning to think of as 'trojan bots', i.e. they are leaders for the actual spam yet to come.

Although I will apologise if proved wrong.
As I was catching up with xkcd earlier I also thought today's was somewhat apt:

Image
xkcd wrote:And what about all the people who won't be able to join the community because they're terrible at making helpful and constructive co-- ... oh.
User avatar
Kayla
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:31 am

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by Kayla »

smoking is so gross it makes me gag if people get drunk the alcohol doesnt get into people around them banning it seems like a good idea smoking i mean last year we went to texas and we went to this restaurant with a smoking section and the smoke was drifting to the non smoking section i nearly barfed i could not stay there
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by chaz wyman »

Richard Baron wrote:
duszek wrote:The pensions crisis is not resolved by smoking-related diseases. These diseases are not lethal, they make you a cripple to be cared for by the community.
I think that smoking does shorten life expectancy, and that if you impose a reasonable tax on tobacco, you can easily cover the healthcare costs.
duszek wrote:To solve the pensions crisis we have to consider pensions as a nice supplement to a normal salary. Everyone should work until they die, keep himself in good shape by walking long distances every day in free nature, praying and fasting.

:D
http://www.the-tma.org.uk/tma-publicati ... m-tobacco/

The fact are that smoking raises £10 billion, which is around 10% of the entire health budget.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/backg ... /86599.stm

The health costs of smoking related disease is estimated at around £1.5 billion.

Case closed?
User avatar
Kayla
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:31 am

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by Kayla »

smoking is addictive behavior and if you take one form of addiction from an addict they will find another so if you ban smoking they will take up gambling or drinking more or whatever that will generate tax revenue i dont care people gambling and drinking dont give me dry heaves even smokers who are not smoking at the very moment still smell totally disgusting
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by chaz wyman »

Kayla wrote:smoking is addictive behavior and if you take one form of addiction from an addict they will find another so if you ban smoking they will take up gambling or drinking more or whatever that will generate tax revenue i dont care people gambling and drinking dont give me dry heaves even smokers who are not smoking at the very moment still smell totally disgusting
That is a common misconception.
Addiction of different substances hits different people in different ways.
This misconception has been used as a paradoxical and unfair excuse to ban drugs.
Cannabis leads to Coke , coke leads to Heroine - you've heard the story. So why don't they also ban smoking and drink.
Does not drink lead to other drugs, and does not smoking lead to cannabis?

PS it's s good thing to hear a young person so anti-smoking.
When I was a kid both my parents and grandmother smoked. i did not even know that it had a smell - except a faintly nice aroma which I associated with people sitting down calmly.
No wonder I started smoking as soon as I was able - at age 11!
As the addictive nature of the drug dug in, it became apparent from the News that the dangers of smoking were now being accepted. I've not smoked now for 8 years - but i think deep down I am still addicted.
I've done every other drug under the sun and have only ever been addicted to tobacco.
Last edited by chaz wyman on Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
John
Posts: 738
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:05 pm
Location: Near Glasgow, Scotland

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by John »

Kayla wrote:smoking is addictive behavior and if you take one form of addiction from an addict they will find another so if you ban smoking they will take up gambling or drinking more or whatever that will generate tax revenue i dont care people gambling and drinking dont give me dry heaves even smokers who are not smoking at the very moment still smell totally disgusting
What evidence do you have that people with an addiction will just get addicted to something else if they beat their addiction? If you're suggesting that giving up smoking will lead to gambling or alcoholism I think you'd better be able to back it up by evidence or else someone like me will say you're talking rubbish.
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by artisticsolution »

Actually, a friend of mine just got her doctorate in psychology and her thesis happened to be on this exact thing. She was telling me that the research shows that most addictive personalities do trade one addiction for another. But she was talking mostly about people who have gastric bypass or lap band surgeries for compulsive overeating so I don't know if applies to other addictions. The next time I see her I will ask her where I can find the statistics.
User avatar
Kayla
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:31 am

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by Kayla »

why do you think people who quit smoking gain weight

eating is an addiction too
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by chaz wyman »

artisticsolution wrote:Actually, a friend of mine just got her doctorate in psychology and her thesis happened to be on this exact thing. She was telling me that the research shows that most addictive personalities do trade one addiction for another. But she was talking mostly about people who have gastric bypass or lap band surgeries for compulsive overeating so I don't know if applies to other addictions. The next time I see her I will ask her where I can find the statistics.
Should the existence of addicts be allowed to prevent others from enjoying drugs?
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by artisticsolution »

I don't understand the question.
User avatar
John
Posts: 738
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:05 pm
Location: Near Glasgow, Scotland

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by John »

Kayla wrote:why do you think people who quit smoking gain weight

eating is an addiction too
Smoking suppresses hunger?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by chaz wyman »

artisticsolution wrote:I don't understand the question.
Addiction is the main reason why they make drugs illegal.
For most people addiction is no problem, so why should I suffer from a prohibition on, say, cannabis, and Cokaine, to help those that might get addicted?
There is an added problem too - that alcohol and tobacco are addictive but they are not made illegal. These cause more social problems than cannabis ever could. So why have a prohibition on cannabis and not on alcohol or tobacco?
In fact what right does a government has to make anything that I might use to harm myself illegal - when it arbitrarily falls short of doing the same with cars, guns, bow and arrow, and many other lethal substances?
Is it not true that the law against drugs is more about stopping people having fun?
Typist
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:12 am

Re: smoking law abuse

Post by Typist »

I believe I have heard some reference to banning smoking in homes in some news report, but can not quote the source, and may misremember. If true, I would have to agree that's a step too far.

However....

I remain absolutely amazed at how we tolerate the tobacco companies.

First, let me say I'm not a big fan of corporate conspiracy theories, as they usually seem to be grounded in purely partisan and emotional agendas.

That said, I must admit, the tobacco companies do seem to almost perfectly represent every hysterical negative assumption about big corporations.

They have deliberately engineered a highly addictive and destructive product, and lied about it at every opportunity for decades.

Their business model of selling addictive destructive products is responsible for a very high number of deaths, at a rate which seems to dwarf all other legal and illegal substances.

What I find remarkable is that we live in a culture that is close to hysterical regarding health and conspiracy theories. If 5 people die from some brand of aspirin, it leads the news and a Congressional investigation is launched. Pointing the accusing morally superior finger at others is a leading national sport.

And yet, the tobacco companies escape any real sustained focus decade after decade. It's truly remarkable how successful their PR departments are.

Because I've accused a number of forum members of being baby fascists, I feel compelled to admit my own fascists weaknesses. If I had the power, I would find it a real struggle to not immediately line all the tobacco company executives up against the firing squad wall.
Post Reply