Philosophy

[Wizard22]

I do not need to or want to learn about Homosexuality. I've seen the videos. I've seen grown men lip-locking. It's repulsive to me. I believe it is repulsive to you, and most others too, but you "learned" early on to suppress and "tolerate" your disgust. Everybody knows the truth, the obvious, what homosexuality implies in the bedroom. No amount of "learning" is going to stop my gag-reflex, or yours. You can suppress it, sure. It doesn't mean that it vanishes, or worse...that it was never there in the first place.

When speaking common sense becomes a revolutionary act—then you know times are truly depressed.

The J-Media across the Western World keeps distracting people from the obvious. People bitch and moan, daily, on every television channel, liberal or conservative, about the symptoms, but never the disease. This is why History-Repeats. Because history is political. Religion is Yesterday's Politics, today. Most of the old battles are waged, because the wars are never truly won. So, yes, it's obvious to me why you and others would balk and cower at the idea of mass social sexual degeneracy being a problem, especially about how fondly your Boomer generation adulates the 1970s. What you and other boomers do not realize, however, is that sex is no something to be 'Proud' of, as-if liberals really stuck it to all those uptight Eastern American Evangelicals!! You didn't. You failed. Western Society has failed.

While everybody was busy chasing Hedonism, the Western power has receded, allowing Eastern Civilization—Russia, China, India, to catch up.

And now NATO is poising for another, major, Nuclear World War.


Why? Because you and other liberals are obsessed about butt-sex???

No, that's a mere distraction. And it's a distraction that could cost hundreds of millions of people around the world their lives.

[Sculptor]

Trans surgery is consensual.

So you admit that you support genital mutilation of teenagers and children.

Glad that we have that point down now.

Let me repeat, YOU are worse than Islam.

No Islam mutilates baby boys and girls without consent.

I do not support the genital mutilation of babies that has been practiced for thousands of years.

But when a young person is capable of making choices it is neither your business not mine what they chose to do with their body.
I am also very confident that not a single operation has been carried out without psychiatric and ethical oversight.
If you have evidence to the contrary for a reliable source then please cite.

SO cite or fuck off.
It's pointless trying to communicate with an idiotic little Trumper. So if you can't play by the rules fuck off

[Sculptor]

I do not need to or want to learn about Homosexuality. I've seen the videos. I've seen grown men lip-locking. It's repulsive to me.

You are in denial.
You are a closet queen.
Why not just admit it to yourself and be happy?

[Belinda]

I do not need to or want to learn about Homosexuality. I've seen the videos. I've seen grown men lip-locking. It's repulsive to me.

You are in denial.
You are a closet queen.
Why not just admit it to yourself and be happy?

Wizzard is unwilling to face evidence that sexual orientations among humankind are as various as they are. Everybody is 'homosexual' everybody is 'heterosexual' .

Worse, Wizzard will not look at his own shadow side.

[Wizard22]

Ah yes, the "be a faggot" argument.

Maybe you should two should question your own 'acceptance' of sodomy as an "equal" erotic action to insemination?

You both sound childless to me. What can be a more vacuous existence than childless Boomers?

[Wizard22]

When reading about Socrates and Greek Philosophy, I remember the stories of the Athenian transexuals/boys who would try to seduce Socrates and other old patricians and men of wisdom/prestige/power. Today we see a repetition of this story. Pro-homosexuals, like Belinda and Sculptor here, cannot see beyond a world of sex and sexuality. They never grew out of the 1970s, as is the case with most boomers, obsessed with Sex. The 'Boomer' generation is notorious for self-gratification and decadence, thinking nothing of their children, nothing of their genetic lineages, nothing of the distant future. If anything, these types can be said to be blind. They have no great vision, no great insight, and no great dreams of the future.

A wasted Generation. I implore Zoomers to reject all ideologies of the Boomers. They will leave nothing behind worth remembering. The destruction, anarchy, rioting, political hatred, animosity, fanaticism that USA witnessed in 2019 and 2020 will get much worse, as ideological, political, and cultural divides deepen and separate Western Civilization. But politics is mashed potatoes. Let's discuss Philosophy.

Generation-Z needs a superior, substantial ideology. Something very Conservative and disciplined. No more of this pro-faggotry bullshit that Belinda and Sculptor promote, because it's all their minds can obsess about.

[Wizard22]

Why am I against "Intellectuals"?

Because they're not that intellectual. It's hubris. The "intellectual" clout of the Liberal-Leftist-Democrats, and their ilk, is a ruse. It attempts to convey a sense of superiority of the rich, wealth, elitist liberal types, over rural conservatives and farmers. It disguises laziness and decadence as "hard work". It is blatantly Socialist and thievery. It's empty. It has no substance.

I mean, look at this conversation about homosexuality/transexuality. What 'future' is this, simplistic sexual hedonism?? Minds in the gutter. Think about having several children, and their children, and their children. Build an empire. That's worthy of thinking about. Build something that lasts and stands the test of time.

'Marketing', propaganda, teaching young boys to castrate themselves, young girls to slice their breasts off—that's not "intellectual".

Being intellectual is using your brain, push your reason and rationality to the limit. Embarrass and humiliate simple-minded cretins who spout propaganda. Show them their countless errors and rub their faces in it. These intellectuals are not so intelligent.


There's nothing intellectual about selling meth and weed to kids.

[Wizard22]

Intelligence is Creative.

Only the smartest minds ever given birth to Mankind could build the great Cathedrals of the past centuries.


Stupidity is Destructive.

All those below the truly 'intellectual', are resentful, hateful, and bitter. They cannot create, thus compelled to destroy, out of spite.


Use "Sculptor" as an example. He cannot create a great work of art. He cannot carve ideas out of words and letters. So he depends on bitterness, resent, and personal attacks as his 'substance'. He cannot build a Philosophy, so he must destroy.

[FlashDangerpants]

When reading about Socrates and Greek Philosophy, I remember the stories of the Athenian transexuals/boys who would try to seduce Socrates and other old patricians and men of wisdom/prestige/power.

Uh-huh, yup, that's the sort of sentence sane that people write.


And do you find little boys often try to seduce you as well?

[Belinda]

Why am I against "Intellectuals"?

Because they're not that intellectual. It's hubris. The "intellectual" clout of the Liberal-Leftist-Democrats, and their ilk, is a ruse. It attempts to convey a sense of superiority of the rich, wealth, elitist liberal types, over rural conservatives and farmers. It disguises laziness and decadence as "hard work". It is blatantly Socialist and thievery. It's empty. It has no substance.

I mean, look at this conversation about homosexuality/transexuality. What 'future' is this, simplistic sexual hedonism?? Minds in the gutter. Think about having several children, and their children, and their children. Build an empire. That's worthy of thinking about. Build something that lasts and stands the test of time.

'Marketing', propaganda, teaching young boys to castrate themselves, young girls to slice their breasts off—that's not "intellectual".

Being intellectual is using your brain, push your reason and rationality to the limit. Embarrass and humiliate simple-minded cretins who spout propaganda. Show them their countless errors and rub their faces in it. These intellectuals are not so intelligent.


There's nothing intellectual about selling meth and weed to kids.

If you were a reader you may learn to present some decent arguments instead of expressing feelings all the time.

[Sculptor]

I do not need to or want to learn about Homosexuality. I've seen the videos. I've seen grown men lip-locking. It's repulsive to me.

You are in denial.
You are a closet queen.
Why not just admit it to yourself and be happy?

Wizzard is unwilling to face evidence that sexual orientations among humankind are as various as they are. Everybody is 'homosexual' everybody is 'heterosexual' .

Worse, Wizzard will not look at his own shadow side.

I'm pretty horrified that such people can be walk the earth in the 21stC.
I was sure as a young man looking forwards that all this would have been understood by now.
How desperately disappointed I am by the human race.

[Sculptor]

Intelligence is Creative.

Only the smartest minds ever given birth to Mankind could build the great Cathedrals of the past centuries.


Stupidity is Destructive.

All those below the truly 'intellectual', are resentful, hateful, and bitter. They cannot create, thus compelled to destroy, out of spite.


Use "Sculptor" as an example. He cannot create a great work of art. He cannot carve ideas out of words and letters. So he depends on bitterness, resent, and personal attacks as his 'substance'. He cannot build a Philosophy, so he must destroy.

What a desperate little boy your are.

[Sculptor]

Ah yes, the "be a faggot" argument.

Maybe you should two should question your own 'acceptance' of sodomy as an "equal" erotic action to insemination?

You both sound childless to me. What can be a more vacuous existence than childless Boomers?

I've tried sodomy - I did not like it. It makes your penis smell and the lady in question did not think much of it either.
But you can post your own experience if you wish, but I'm not interested in you sexual activities.

[Walker]

Why was homosexuality, transexuality, genital mutilation, child sacrifice excessive during the Roman Empire before they descended into the Dark Ages?

It’s an interesting phenomenon that appears to be repeating. A society advances, human knowledge increases by always looking further, by breaking boundaries. The tendency is in humans and not in animals.

Eventually, the broken boundary becomes the status quo. The horizon moves farther away. Folks stagger about benumbed to the status quo until a spark finds something new to surprise, to shock, to penetrate the armour that has built up around folks that enables them to survive civilization.

And the horizon moves farther away as folks become accepting of this, and what was once shocking becomes commonplace. In this way, by increments, titillating French post cards for men from 19th century, transmuted into sexual intercourse instruction manuals for little children, in the 21st century government schools.

Because the interval between cause and effect does seem to be decreasing overall, don’t be surprised if a John Clease-like headmaster will be giving real live sexual instruction live on a desk, aided by his lovely wife who is a woman, to a class of attentive, adolescent boys … and it won’t be a movie.

If you don't accept this as normal, there are herd ways of making you comply. Ways more convincing that mere peer pressure. Political ways. Uh huh.

[Belinda]

Why was homosexuality, transexuality, genital mutilation, child sacrifice excessive during the Roman Empire before they descended into the Dark Ages?

It’s an interesting phenomenon that appears to be repeating. A society advances, human knowledge increases by always looking further, by breaking boundaries. The tendency is in humans and not in animals.

Eventually, the broken boundary becomes the status quo. The horizon moves farther away. Folks stagger about benumbed to the status quo until a spark finds something new to surprise, to shock, to penetrate the armour that has built up around folks that enables them to survive civilization.

And the horizon moves farther away as folks become accepting of this, and what was once shocking becomes commonplace. In this way, by increments, titillating French post cards for men from 19th century, transmuted into sexual intercourse instruction manuals for little children, in the 21st century government schools.

Because the interval between cause and effect does seem to be decreasing overall, don’t be surprised if a John Clease-like headmaster will be giving real live sexual instruction live on a desk, aided by his lovely wife who is a woman, to a class of attentive, adolescent boys … and it won’t be a movie.

If you don't accept this as normal, there are herd ways of making you comply. Ways more convincing that mere peer pressure. Political ways. Uh huh.

But what you describe would be voyerism which is a form of sexual relations. Voyerism is not right as a teaching method. I hope you can tell the difference between voyerism and pictures in books. To tell which pictures in books are suitable you need to be able to distinguish between sensational and explicit material.

When you are teaching you are careful not to have sexual relations with students. This is because the teacher must have the students' welfare in mind, and the power relation between student and teacher is biased towards the teacher.