Why knowing 'Yourself' will never make sense.

[Dontaskme]

I'm not telling anyone anything, I'm simply leaving a message for the reader...it's up to the reader to resonate or not.
There is only one reader by the way....reading information that arises as many authors of the information being read.

Anyways, thanks for nothing...bye.

I wrote for readers also. Why are you thanking me for nothing? Or are both our contributions nothing?

I cannot answer your questions for you, only you can do that, you are the only author of your own knowledge.

I'm just an echo of you.

[Dontaskme]

LOL ONCE AGAIN. It is NOT 'the label' that is known as a 'human being'. 'The label' 'human being' is put on, or placed upon, the 'thing', (which is known as 'human being'. That 'thing' is the 'human body' with 'a being' inside it.

I've absolutely no idea what you are trying to say....sorry, that makes no sense to me here.



.

Okay. But it REALLY is VERY OBVIOUS what I am saying here.

You asked me, "why is the label that is known as a 'human being' also known as a 'thing' that can put a label on itself...can things do that?"

Firstly, I NEVER EVER said 'the label' is known as a 'human being'. This is just SO ABSURD that it is absolutely RIDICULOUS.

'you', human beings, are literally known by 'the label' 'human being'.

EACH and EVERY 'label' is known as 'a label', and NOT the other way around as you, LAUGHABLY, proposed here.

Secondly, EVERY 'thing' is also known as 'a thing'.

Thirdly, ONLY the 'thing' known as 'human being' can put 'labels' on ANY and EVERY 'thing', including 'itself'. So, some 'things' can do that. And, they are 'you', human beings, ONLY.

I know...because I is known.

And that which is known....knows no thing, nothing, zilch, zero.

Do you want me to keep repeating this to you, again and again and again.

[Iwannaplato]

I cannot answer your questions for you, only you can do that, you are the only author of your own knowledge.

I'm just an echo of you.

I love it. You presume to tell the answers and give knowledge and rule out what people say as being possible, but when asked a question you cannot do that.

And you're no echoing me. Unless your idea of echoing means I am echoing you.

[Age]

But, it could also be said that EVERY thing is, literally, a 'thing'.

A Thing is known.

And that which is KNOWN....KNOWS NO THING.

There might be some truth in this, that is; UNTIL the 'thing' that KNOWS 'things' becomes KNOWN.

What 'you' are CLAIMING here is that 'you', human beings, which ARE KNOWN, does NOT KNOW ANY thing. Which is ACTUALLY True, at the VERY DEEPEST level of 'things'.

But, who and what thee one and only True Self is EXACTLY, is once KNOWN, which has ALREADY HAPPENED by the way "dontaskme", it is ACTUALLY thee ONLY Thing that CAN, and DOES, KNOW 'things'. So, absolutely refuting what you say and claim here.

And is why knowing 'Yourself' will never make sense.

Do you want me to repeat this to you again and again and again?

LOL you can repeat it as many times as you like. But this will NEVER make it True, Right, NOR Correct.

Oh, and by the way, I will repeat I AGREE with 'you' that 'you' could NEVER KNOW "yourself" BECAUSE "yourself" is an oxymoron or contradiction in and of itself.

[Age]

I KNOW, and the REASON WHY I do it is to 'draw out' the Truly CURIOS and Truly INTELLIGENT ones.

I CERTAINLY have NO 'need' to back up and support my claims beforehand. I KNOW they are irrefutably True, so that is ALL I 'need' here.

You are only drawing out the intelligence of your own self...and no one elses self.

There is NO "other".

There are, however, the 'selfs', which are also known as and by the word 'you', human beings.

And, you are right about 'drawing out' thee one and only INTELLIGENCE, which exists alongside thee one and only True Self. It is 'this' 'Self' 'drawing out' thy Self, from WITHIN 'you', human beings.

Getting past 'you', human beings, is just the issue here. Thus the reason for LEARNING how to communicate with 'you', human beings, BETTER.

Of course there is no need to back up your own claim, you are the only author of any claim you make. No one else makes what is only your claim that is true for you.

Stop inventing another you... that you feel you need to draw out.. you already know what's true, and so does everybody else ...so no need for you to invent others to draw out.

EACH and EVERY 'you' use the 'you' word 'you' are creating an "other".

'I' am just 'drawing out' thee One and ONLY from WITHIN 'you', human beings.

If you there know...then others will know too...there is no need to inform others what they already know...


.

'WILL KNOW' is correct.

But 'they' and 'you' do NOT ALREADY, consciously, KNOW.

This KNOWLEDGE is ALREADY KNOWN, deep within, but for most of 'you' it is STILL unconsciously KNOWN KNOWLEDGE, which is just in the process of being REVEALED, or in other words just coming-to-light.

[Dontaskme]

I cannot answer your questions for you, only you can do that, you are the only author of your own knowledge.

I'm just an echo of you.

I love it. You presume to tell the answers and give knowledge and rule out what people say as being possible, but when asked a question you cannot do that.

And you're no echoing me. Unless your idea of echoing means I am echoing you.

There is no self that can know itself...this is the topic we are discussing. You can discuss this topic or not, I care not whether you do or don't.

Now, can a no self, ask a question....I don't think so. If you need to question that, then only you can know the answer, because only you are asking the question.

[Age]

ONLY the 'thing' known by the label 'human being' can label 'things'.

No, that's wrong...human being is a label KNOWN....not by the label itself....because labels that are known cannot know any thing.

'I' NEVER said what 'you' just said here. So, WHY do 'you' TWIST what 'I' say, around?

Do you want me to keep repeating this same conceptual mantra to you over and over again?

LOL, 'you' CAN. But 'you' are only repeating the SAME mantra to counter only what ONLY 'you' are saying and claiming here.

'you' are STILL MISSING and MISTAKING what 'I' have ACTUALLY SAID and CLAIMED.

[Age]

Why don't you just mind your own fucking business.

This has nothing to do with you. This is to do with me and Walker, it is both our feelings that are involved, so please stay out of what doesn't concern you personally.

You have no idea what is the history between Walker and I ...so just keep your busy body nose out...ok

So, in other words, 'you' REALLY have absolutely NO idea NOR clue as to why 'you' ALLOW other 'things' to HAVE and TAKE control OVER 'your' feelings.

This is between Walker and I ...you have no business in what is our business, so again, just stay out of what has nothing to do with you.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN, and PROVED True, here, 'you' are STILL ALLOWING 'things', including 'me' now to have control OVER 'your' feelings. AND, 'you' STILL do NOT KNOW WHY 'you' ALLOW this to happen.

[Dontaskme]

I KNOW, and the REASON WHY I do it is to 'draw out' the Truly CURIOS and Truly INTELLIGENT ones.

I CERTAINLY have NO 'need' to back up and support my claims beforehand. I KNOW they are irrefutably True, so that is ALL I 'need' here.

You are only drawing out the intelligence of your own self...and no one elses self.

There is NO "other".

There are, however, the 'selfs', which are also known as and by the word 'you', human beings.

And, you are right about 'drawing out' thee one and only INTELLIGENCE, which exists alongside thee one and only True Self. It is 'this' 'Self' 'drawing out' thy Self, from WITHIN 'you', human beings.

Getting past 'you', human beings, is just the issue here. Thus the reason for LEARNING how to communicate with 'you', human beings, BETTER.

Of course there is no need to back up your own claim, you are the only author of any claim you make. No one else makes what is only your claim that is true for you.

Stop inventing another you... that you feel you need to draw out.. you already know what's true, and so does everybody else ...so no need for you to invent others to draw out.

EACH and EVERY 'you' use the 'you' word 'you' are creating an "other".

'I' am just 'drawing out' thee One and ONLY from WITHIN 'you', human beings.

If you there know...then others will know too...there is no need to inform others what they already know...


.

'WILL KNOW' is correct.

But 'they' and 'you' do NOT ALREADY, consciously, KNOW.

This KNOWLEDGE is ALREADY KNOWN, deep within, but for most of 'you' it is STILL unconsciously KNOWN KNOWLEDGE, which is just in the process of being REVEALED, or in other words just coming-to-light.

There is no such state as an unconscious known knowledge... that can be known.

Keep trying though, you might just hit the spot..If I keep repeating this to you over and over and over again.

[Age]

If we mean some kind of 100% knowing oneself, well, that would be unlikely.

"oneself" is an oxymoron or contradiction in terms. BUT, to KNOW thy Self, and the self, 100% has ALREADY BEEN DONE.

Cool, who did it?

'I', or 'me', if you like.

This knowing, or learning, more happens individually, and collectively.

Agreed.

And has been happening continually hitherto, so there is NO reason to think or assume that it would stop continuing until KNOWING 100% is reached, correct?

I don't rule it out.

Cool.

[Dontaskme]

So, in other words, 'you' REALLY have absolutely NO idea NOR clue as to why 'you' ALLOW other 'things' to HAVE and TAKE control OVER 'your' feelings.

This is between Walker and I ...you have no business in what is our business, so again, just stay out of what has nothing to do with you.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN, and PROVED True, here, 'you' are STILL ALLOWING 'things', including 'me' now to have control OVER 'your' feelings. AND, 'you' STILL do NOT KNOW WHY 'you' ALLOW this to happen.

None of your business.

And that you continue to make it your business when it's not... makes you a disrepectful person.

Again, this is between Walker and I..not you...so run along, like the respectful person you are.

[Age]

I've absolutely no idea what you are trying to say....sorry, that makes no sense to me here.



.

Okay. But it REALLY is VERY OBVIOUS what I am saying here.

You asked me, "why is the label that is known as a 'human being' also known as a 'thing' that can put a label on itself...can things do that?"

Firstly, I NEVER EVER said 'the label' is known as a 'human being'. This is just SO ABSURD that it is absolutely RIDICULOUS.

'you', human beings, are literally known by 'the label' 'human being'.

EACH and EVERY 'label' is known as 'a label', and NOT the other way around as you, LAUGHABLY, proposed here.

Secondly, EVERY 'thing' is also known as 'a thing'.

Thirdly, ONLY the 'thing' known as 'human being' can put 'labels' on ANY and EVERY 'thing', including 'itself'. So, some 'things' can do that. And, they are 'you', human beings, ONLY.

I know...because I is known.

And that which is known....knows no thing, nothing, zilch, zero.

Do you want me to keep repeating this to you, again and again and again.

'you' CAN, But 'you' will STILL REMAIN Wrong AND Incorrect.

[Dontaskme]

Okay. But it REALLY is VERY OBVIOUS what I am saying here.

You asked me, "why is the label that is known as a 'human being' also known as a 'thing' that can put a label on itself...can things do that?"

Firstly, I NEVER EVER said 'the label' is known as a 'human being'. This is just SO ABSURD that it is absolutely RIDICULOUS.

'you', human beings, are literally known by 'the label' 'human being'.

EACH and EVERY 'label' is known as 'a label', and NOT the other way around as you, LAUGHABLY, proposed here.

Secondly, EVERY 'thing' is also known as 'a thing'.

Thirdly, ONLY the 'thing' known as 'human being' can put 'labels' on ANY and EVERY 'thing', including 'itself'. So, some 'things' can do that. And, they are 'you', human beings, ONLY.

I know...because I is known.

And that which is known....knows no thing, nothing, zilch, zero.

Do you want me to keep repeating this to you, again and again and again.

'you' CAN, But 'you' will STILL REMAIN Wrong AND Incorrect.

And CAN't...and Right, and Correct...lets not forget to include everything.

[Age]

I cannot answer your questions for you, only you can do that, you are the only author of your own knowledge.

I'm just an echo of you.

I love it. You presume to tell the answers and give knowledge and rule out what people say as being possible, but when asked a question you cannot do that.

And you're no echoing me. Unless your idea of echoing means I am echoing you.

There is no self that can know itself...this is the topic we are discussing. You can discuss this topic or not, I care not whether you do or don't.

But thee One and ONLY True Self CAN, and DOES KNOW, 'Its' or better worded 'thy' Self, and for your information this 'I' and Self is NOT the illusion-of-'selves', which 'you' talk about and mention here.

Now, can a no self, ask a question....I don't think so.

So, who or what is asking the question here, to 'you', "dontaskme"?

And yes, there are few ironies in that.

If you need to question that, then only you can know the answer, because only you are asking the question.

[Age]

You are only drawing out the intelligence of your own self...and no one elses self.

There is NO "other".

There are, however, the 'selfs', which are also known as and by the word 'you', human beings.

And, you are right about 'drawing out' thee one and only INTELLIGENCE, which exists alongside thee one and only True Self. It is 'this' 'Self' 'drawing out' thy Self, from WITHIN 'you', human beings.

Getting past 'you', human beings, is just the issue here. Thus the reason for LEARNING how to communicate with 'you', human beings, BETTER.

Of course there is no need to back up your own claim, you are the only author of any claim you make. No one else makes what is only your claim that is true for you.

Stop inventing another you... that you feel you need to draw out.. you already know what's true, and so does everybody else ...so no need for you to invent others to draw out.

EACH and EVERY 'you' use the 'you' word 'you' are creating an "other".

'I' am just 'drawing out' thee One and ONLY from WITHIN 'you', human beings.

If you there know...then others will know too...there is no need to inform others what they already know...


.

'WILL KNOW' is correct.

But 'they' and 'you' do NOT ALREADY, consciously, KNOW.

This KNOWLEDGE is ALREADY KNOWN, deep within, but for most of 'you' it is STILL unconsciously KNOWN KNOWLEDGE, which is just in the process of being REVEALED, or in other words just coming-to-light.

There is no such state as an unconscious known knowledge... that can be known.

So, what happens if, and when, 'you' come to KNOW that ACTUALLY all along 'you' have KNOWN what is actually Right and Wrong in Life, but just NOT consciously. What would you call and class this unconsciously KNOWN knowledge?

Keep trying though, you might just hit the spot..If I keep repeating this to you over and over and over again.

Here 'you' are AGAIN 'tying to' TELL "others" what the ACTUAL Truth IS, to "dontaskme". Which CONTRADICTORY, and AGAIN, 'you' ALSO CLAIM can NOT be KNOWN.