Why knowing 'Yourself' will never make sense.

[Dontaskme]

What are you looking for here? The name of the first human being, or something else?

No, I'm looking for the FIRST human being - if you know you are born, it is because you have been birthed by a human body.

But what I am looking for it how did the FIRST human body come into existence?

Is this too difficult for you to answer?

[Walker]

Is this too difficult for you to answer?

To understand the following, it may help to listen along.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2SJozORyL4

It’s not that you disrespect words but rather, you grow weary of their mundane use without going further into the mundane to the discover the supramundane, aka, transcending the boredom of the known.

For example: the beauty way appears to emptiness as a path as natural as water’s flow, and that is when that voice you hear goes silent. It happens every day unnoticed because you’re not telling yourself Hey, lookee there! Because if you did that, the voice would again be yapping to you and aiding in your struggle to recapture what you didn’t even realize was there (silence).

What does this mean? It means that no thought opens the door to siddhis. Fortunately, equanimity makes that both tolerable and utterly superfluous to other than what is.

Knowing yourself always makes perfect sense once you discover The Unified Field Theory of Awareness that yokes what’s inside the noggin, to what’s outside the noggin, while accounting for what gets left in the albumen for recycling. When you know yourself, Glasshopper*, then this makes perfect sense because of the fact that the totality of each and every understanding is the synthesis of transmission and reception, no matter what percentage either T&R contributes to the whole of whatever is understood.

This natural dynamic is the mostest likely reason why Garfunkel and Simon the Elder were moved by energy to energetically compose The Sounds of Silence, which is of course a paradox to which all but the most gone can attest, seeing as how silence contains all the sounds.

I know, I know, so many questions such as, what is he trying to say? Well, you should know by now where that road leads, neo-Neo. For you, is leads to the rage of frustration and the need to dismiss.

So, what would be the new road for one so tied to the mundane that warbling attempts to find sense results in only incomprehension of not only the big whys but also the nooks and cranny whys, leading to nonsense in the transmission and the reception?

- Answer #1: The new road is to emulate Life by means of finding the answers in the existing content, rather than demand more information. In Life the answers are always right there in front of you. This is what the folks in the Netflix Series Alone, learn.

- Answer#2: return to the basics only once to reach the Emerald City, Dorothy.

* theme of the thread

[Dontaskme]

It’s not that you disrespect words but rather, you grow weary of their mundane use without going further into the mundane to the discover the supramundane, aka, transcending the boredom of the known.

I hate words, that's why animals are luckier than humans. Humans are animals with a mushy story to sell to others, that's all, it's all rather obnoxious of them to ram their story down someone elses throat, who doesn't give a crap about stories, I mean how disrespectful is that.

And that's all I have say on this matter. So shove your mush up your own tush, and stop boring me with transcendental crapola mush, just because you are so bored of it to the point that you need to get other people to bare some of the boredom for you.

The problem with preachy prickles like you is that you are in denial that life is one boring pointless, meaningless, dumb stupid, painful unecessary activity from start to finish, and that's why you invented me to play with, even though I have no interest in playing your dumb boring stupid ideas about transcendental life stories with you.


.

[Walker]

I just feel so ... dismissed.

[Dontaskme]

Transcending the boredom of the known.

WOOOOOOOW!

What an amazing idea...lets all transcend the boredom of the known...so that we can know new things to be bored with. Sounds like a right boring idea to me. But whatever Walker, whatever gets you through the aching void, hopium and copium are ususally very good distractions that will help you to avoid the void.

Me, I love the void, I love being bored out of my mind into that transcendental realm of pure nothingness, it's all I know.

[Age]

Which will make PERFECT SENSE when what the actual difference is between 'self' and 'Self' becomes KNOWN

Which Self makes known a perfect sense to itself? is it the small s or the big S ?

If you had been reading and following my words in this forum, and were even just somewhat curious, then you would ALREADY KNOW that it is the big S Self.

If the small s is the self that makes known a perfect sense - does that mean the big S doesn't get to know how to make perfect sense?

Or if the big S is the self that makes known a perfect sense - does that mean the small s doesn't get to know how to make perfect sense?

The small s self only 'thinks'. Whereas, the big S Self 'knows'.

Are we supposed to be obliged to make sense of this perfect senseless sense making activity, or can we just throw it all down the loo where it belongs?

'you', human beings, are absolutely FREE to do absolutely ANY thing of your choosing.

[Dontaskme]

'you', human beings, are absolutely FREE to do absolutely ANY thing of your choosing.

I know, and that's what I am doing....it's not like I have any other choice but to do what I am doing. I could try and live in a reality where I do not do what I am doing, but that would be a bit silly, since I can only do what I am doing, I can never do what I am not doing, otherwise I wouldn't be doing what I am doing, I'd be doing what I am not doing, so I'll just do what I'm doing instead of not doing what I am doing.....or something along those lines.

[Age]

What are you looking for here? The name of the first human being, or something else?

No, I'm looking for the FIRST human being - if you know you are born, it is because you have been birthed by a human body.

1. How far BACK are you looking?

The first human being came about AFTER 'you', human beings, came up with the label and name 'human being' and placed it onto that species, which 'you' ARE. So, whenever 'you' DECIDE 'that species' came into Existence, then that is WHEN the FIRST human being evolved into being.

2. 'you' claim, "if you know you are born, it is because you have been birthed by a human body", which means 'what', exactly?

What are 'you' wanting to say, and mean here?

Also, how 'you' define 'you' is different to how 'I' define 'you'.

But what I am looking for it how did the FIRST human body come into existence?

The SAME WAY each and EVERY species comes into being. That is just through an evolutionary process where ALL 'things' are created by two previous 'things' COME TOGETHER. This is, of course, besides the two 'things' of 'matter' and 'space', themselves.

Is this too difficult for you to answer?

I answered it now, like I did previously. So, the answer to this question is a resounding, NO. Understand?

[Age]

It’s not that you disrespect words but rather, you grow weary of their mundane use without going further into the mundane to the discover the supramundane, aka, transcending the boredom of the known.

I hate words, that's why animals are luckier than humans.

But 'you', human beings, ARE 'animals'.

Humans are animals with a mushy story to sell to others, that's all, it's all rather obnoxious of them to ram their story down someone elses throat, who doesn't give a crap about stories, I mean how disrespectful is that.

YET here 'you' are continually TELLING 'us' that YOUR STORY is the true, right, and correct one.

Also, it is the adults, of the species 'human', who TELL 'their stories'.

Children LISTEN, and LEARN, instead.

And that's all I have say on this matter. So shove your mush up your own tush, and stop boring me with transcendental crapola mush, just because you are so bored of it to the point that you need to get other people to bare some of the boredom for you.

WHY do you so quickly DISMISS the "other", and turn a 'deaf ear' on them, if they say ANY thing, which you imply is in opposition of you?

The problem with preachy prickles like you is that you are in denial that life is one boring pointless, meaningless, dumb stupid, painful unecessary activity from start to finish, and that's why you invented me to play with, even though I have no interest in playing your dumb boring stupid ideas about transcendental life stories with you.


.

Why do 'you' express 'your views' here, to those 'you' invented up to HEAR 'you'?

But when the "others" do NOT agree with 'you', and 'your' 'worldly views', why do you NOT like this?

[Age]

'you', human beings, are absolutely FREE to do absolutely ANY thing of your choosing.

I know, and that's what I am doing....it's not like I have any other choice but to do what I am doing.

WHY do you say this?

Do you NOT have ANY 'freedom' AT ALL?

And, WHY do you say you KNOW that you are absolutely FREE to do absolutely ANY thing, but then instantly also say that you, actually, have absolutely NO choice AT ALL?

Are you able to explain the discrepancies here?

if yes, then will you?

I could try and live in a reality where I do not do what I am doing, but that would be a bit silly, since I can only do what I am doing, I can never do what I am not doing, otherwise I wouldn't be doing what I am doing, I'd be doing what I am not doing, so I'll just do what I'm doing instead of not doing what I am doing.....or something along those lines.

Why do you, quite frequently, end up saying Truly absurd and idiotic things, as well as proposing that that was what was being inferred or implied?

[Dontaskme]

1. How far BACK are you looking?

The first human being came about AFTER 'you', human beings, came up with the label and name 'human being' and placed it onto that species, which 'you' ARE. So, whenever 'you' DECIDE 'that species' came into Existence, then that is WHEN the FIRST human being evolved into being.

Right, so you are saying the first human being came into existence when the label was labled as such. And a label is able to label itself?

Now all you have to do is figure out who or what labels the things that are conceptually known in life?

And if like you say, a human being which is a label labeling itself as such, then all you have said is that a label can label itself,...that's like saying the label on a can of tomato soup really knows that tomato soup is indeed inside the can?... it's like saying a body can just exist and give birth to itself without the need for another body to know it's been born.
But that's rather silly isn't it?

I answered it now, like I did previously. So, the answer to this question is a resounding, NO. Understand?

Obviously you didn't, can't and don't.

[Dontaskme]

Why do you, quite frequently, end up saying Truly absurd and idiotic things, as well as proposing that that was what was being inferred or implied?

Same reason why you say, or anyone else says Truly absurd and idiotic things.

[Dontaskme]

Why do 'you' express 'your views' here, to those 'you' invented up to HEAR 'you'?

Why not, what else is there to do here?

But when the "others" do NOT agree with 'you', and 'your' 'worldly views', why do you NOT like this?

I couldn't give a baboons red raw backside whether others agree with me or not... fool.

I couldn't give a flying mouldy green nose bogie that you assume I do not like this, whatever in the hell this this is supposed to be that I do not like.

[Dontaskme]

I just feel so ... dismissed.

Just walk away, I'm sure there is plenty of porn elsewhere you can be watching instead of boring me half to death with your emotional crapola meaningless stories.

[Dontaskme]

WHY do you so quickly DISMISS the "other", and turn a 'deaf ear' on them, if they say ANY thing, which you imply is in opposition of you?

I'm not dismissing any one. I'm simply replying to other peoples ideas with my own responses, it's not my fault if they feel dismissed by my responses. For all I know, my responses may contain something which is of great value to those who are reading, I don't know, I'm not a mind reader. I just post my ideas and that's all, I'm in no way forcing anyone to like them, or to even read them...if they do, then that's because they chose to do so. I have nothing to do with their own made up choices. It's not like I'm saying anything illegal here is it? if I am, then I'm sure the forum founder will have the good sense to censor me permanently.