Philosophy
Re: Philosophy
How many millenniums do you want to wait for an apple tree to produce grapes, or watermelons, or ham sandwiches?
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Philosophy
So says your truth. But his truth says you are wrong.Belinda wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:29 amYes but the culture of Pol Pot was wrong.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:00 amPol Pot's moral principles were true for him, but several observers found them lacking.
The word "true" is being used in a way that does not exclude false here, making the whole sentiment worthless.
That's what happens when you are so profligate with the T word.
Re: Philosophy
Genetic engineering does quite a lot to change hereditary possibilities. I bet an apple tree can be made to produce grapes!
As for ham sandwiches , vegetable has been genetically engineered to combine with animal to produce a chimera.
Re: Philosophy
It's deep fact of nature (or God take; your pick) that cultures of belief are often opposed to one another. If there were a God, the only way back to Him would be via conflict and resolution of conflict, as that is the way of the world.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:48 amSo says your truth. But his truth says you are wrong.Belinda wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:29 amYes but the culture of Pol Pot was wrong.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:00 am
Pol Pot's moral principles were true for him, but several observers found them lacking.
The word "true" is being used in a way that does not exclude false here, making the whole sentiment worthless.
That's what happens when you are so profligate with the T word.
Anthropologists and good diplomats try to get inside cultures that they did not take in with their mother's milk. And there are strategies that can assist. But in the end the subjective stance is the only stance of which we are capable. Sooner or later there must be an ultimatum if we are to act.
Re: Philosophy
So you basically just contradicted yourself?
You said that you believe that Nature can change, but you're not willing to wait to see this supposed "change".
Re: Philosophy
And that sounds "Unnatural". So it doesn't address the point. Its "Nature" still isn't changing, even if you tried to change its genetics.
Re: Philosophy
It is a contradiction, because your actions do not match your supposed belief.
And I doubt that you actually believe Nature changes. It's such a ludicrous idea, that I don't believe even Belinda believes what she's saying.
And I doubt that you actually believe Nature changes. It's such a ludicrous idea, that I don't believe even Belinda believes what she's saying.
Re: Philosophy
But what men do is natural. What is man if he is not natural?
You have to get to grips with the ethical conundrum of genetic engineering as it is upon us. Some chimeras are forbidden, not because they are not "natural" but because they are cruel.
Last edited by Belinda on Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Philosophy
If Man intercedes, then it still doesn't change the Nature of the thing.
The Apple tree still produces apples, despite the Chimera that was made in its image.
It is a dysfunctional copy, a mimicry, of the original thing. Hence it is unnatural.
The Apple tree still produces apples, despite the Chimera that was made in its image.
It is a dysfunctional copy, a mimicry, of the original thing. Hence it is unnatural.
Re: Philosophy
Please see my post above.
Re: Philosophy
I already read and understood it the first time.
You implied that intervening upon a 'Natural' thing, would mean that it's still natural, despite merely Mimicking the original thing.
A copy is not an original. I disagree with your premise.
You implied that intervening upon a 'Natural' thing, would mean that it's still natural, despite merely Mimicking the original thing.
A copy is not an original. I disagree with your premise.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Philosophy
Why do you keep waffling about "truths" when you are clearly a subjectivist?Belinda wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:59 amIt's deep fact of nature (or God take; your pick) that cultures of belief are often opposed to one another. If there were a God, the only way back to Him would be via conflict and resolution of conflict, as that is the way of the world.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:48 amSo says your truth. But his truth says you are wrong.
That's what happens when you are so profligate with the T word.
Anthropologists and good diplomats try to get inside cultures that they did not take in with their mother's milk. And there are strategies that can assist. But in the end the subjective stance is the only stance of which we are capable. Sooner or later there must be an ultimatum if we are to act.
Is it just for an excuse to sneak God into yet another non-religious conversation?
Re: Philosophy
I did not use the word surviving.
I was asked what was the meaning of life and defined it by it's opposite.
What meaning we may chose to place upon it is up to us and cannot be answered for another.