The Illusory Dream Of Separation

[Dontaskme]

But ONLY I KNOW what the 'it' word WAS and IS referring to here. So, literally, ONLY 'I' KNOW what 'I' am 'talking about' here.

The I is known as a concept/as and through the word itself...and words know nothing.

[Dontaskme]

[Age]

But ONLY I KNOW what the 'it' word WAS and IS referring to here. So, literally, ONLY 'I' KNOW what 'I' am 'talking about' here.

The I is known as a concept/as and through the word itself...and words know nothing.

LOOK "dontaskme", you made the CLAIM that I do NOT know what I was talking about. I just PROVED that I was the ONLY one who KNEW what I was talking about there. I ALSO made the CLAIM that it was ACTUALLY 'you' who did NOT KNOW what I was talking about there. Your response here has just PROVED My CLAIM IRRFUTABLE.

That is ALL here.

[Dontaskme]

Love is just a thought, that does not exist except in this conception, the concept of the word, known but never seen, as illusions are real so too are they unreal.

Evil is Love. And Love is Evil

[Age]

If 'you' NOR 'I' exist, but ONLY the 'self' exists. THEN, WHO or WHAT is the 'self' if 'it' is NOT 'you' NOR 'I'?

[Age]

When 'you' can answer that question, properly AND correctly, then 'you' will be CLOSER to UNDERSTANDING, and thus BEING WISER.

[Dontaskme]

LOOK "dontaskme", you made the CLAIM that I do NOT know what I was talking about. I just PROVED that I was the ONLY one who KNEW what I was talking about there.

The word I is self-evident, no proof is required, proof is liar.

Only truth exits, it does not claim, does not blame, without fame, or shame. Now shut up.

[Dontaskme]

When 'you' can answer that question, properly AND correctly, then 'you' will be CLOSER to UNDERSTANDING, and thus BEING WISER.

The only wise being is no being.

[Dontaskme]

When 'you' can answer that question, properly AND correctly, then 'you' will be CLOSER to UNDERSTANDING, and thus BEING WISER.

The only wise being is no being.

Looking in the mirror may cause it to break, and mortally wound itself.

But on the other hand, if there is no image of me, then I do not exist, therefore, I can only exist as a BROKEN MESS.

[Age]

LOOK "dontaskme", you made the CLAIM that I do NOT know what I was talking about. I just PROVED that I was the ONLY one who KNEW what I was talking about there.

The word I is self-evident, no proof is required, proof is liar.

Besides 'it' NOT making sense, To WHO is; " 'proof' is liar ", and WHEN is; " 'proof' is liar " an ACTUAL 'thing'?

Also, how could 'I' be 'self-evident' when it is 'you' who STATES and CLAIMS that ' THERE IS NO 'I' "?

Only truth exits,

So, there are NO planets, suns, NOR galaxies, NOR even a Universe, correct?

it does not claim, does not blame, without fame, or shame.

Now shut up.

WHY?

[Dontaskme]

WHY?

Because the I already knows what it is not talking about.

[Age]

WHY?

Because the I already knows what it is not talking about.

Are you ABLE to PROVE this, or are you just going to CLAIM this?

[Dontaskme]

WHY?

Because the I already knows what it is not talking about.

Are you ABLE to PROVE this, or are you just going to CLAIM this?

Only I can know what I know as I model it. No one knows me like I do. Only I know I

I cannot know what I really am because then I would know there is nothing to know and nothing to know it.

The paradox is known as ''naive realism''

In social psychology, naïve realism is the human tendency to believe that we see the world around us objectively, and that people who disagree with us must be uninformed, irrational, or biased.

Most people are brainwashed and indoctrinated by a controlled narrative imposed upon them by society which often involves religion and most education institutions.

In reality, there is nothing to know, or learn, or do. Everything is already being lived, and it's all alone, all one.

.

[Dontaskme]

Also, how could 'I' be 'self-evident' when it is 'you' who STATES and CLAIMS that ' THERE IS NO 'I' "?

There is no I is self-evident in the very statement presented - There is no I - is a statement that does not require any additional proof, it's already written and read...There is no I

[Age]

Because the I already knows what it is not talking about.

Are you ABLE to PROVE this, or are you just going to CLAIM this?

Only I can know what I know as I model it. No one knows me like I do. Only I know I

'you' MISSED 'it', AGAIN.

I cannot know what I really am because then I would know there is nothing to know and nothing to know it.

But 'you' CLAIM there is NO 'I', YET 'you' ALSO, CONTRADICTORY, CLAIM there is an 'I'.

The paradox is known as ''naive realism''

In social psychology, naïve realism is the human tendency to believe that we see the world around us objectively, and that people who disagree with us must be uninformed, irrational, or biased.

WHY would 'you', adult human beings, do this?

Work this out, and then 'you' will STOP doing, and SO STOP TEACHING this behavior to those who do NOT do this.

Also, and by the way "dontaskme", are 'you' AWARE that EVERY time you STATE and WRITE, "The truth is ...", then that IS 'you' BELIEVING that 'you' SEE the 'world' around 'you' OBJECTIVELY, and that ANY one who SEES DIFFERENTLY or DISAGREES with 'you' IS, to 'you', UNIFORMED, IRRATIONAL, DELUDED, or BIASED.

Most people are brainwashed and indoctrinated by a controlled narrative imposed upon them by society which often involves religion and most education institutions.

But NOT 'you' hey "dontaskme"?

'you' SEE absolutely EVERY thing from a Truly OBJECTIVE, UNOBSTRUCTED, and ABSOLUTELY CRYSTAL CLEAR PERSPECTIVE, correct?

'you' have NOT been (Wrongly worded and misnomed) 'brainwashed" AT ALL, by ANY thing, correct?

In reality, there is nothing to know, or learn, or do. Everything is already being lived, and it's all alone, all one.

.

ONCE AGAIN, 'you' USE the "In reality, ..." to start YOUR VIEWS and CLAIMS, as though 'you', once again, SEE the 'world' around EVERY one Truly OBJECTIVELY, and if, and when, ANY one DISAGREES with 'you', then it is "them" who is UNIFORMED, IRRATIONAL, Wrong, et cetera, et cetera. Which, by the way, "in social pyschology" is known as 'naive realism'. Just for 'you' INFORMATION.